Wednesday, March 4th 2026

NVIDIA Reportedly Preparing 9 GB GeForce RTX 5050 Variant with GDDR7

NVIDIA is reportedly planning a second RTX 5050 variant with 9 GB of memory instead of the standard 8 GB, according to leaker MEGAsizeGPU who has a decent track record on NVIDIA leaks. Unlike the existing RTX 5050, which uses 8 GB of 20 Gbps GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus for 320 GB/s of bandwidth, the new model is said to adopt 3 GB GDDR7 modules. The updated configuration would total 9 GB across a 96-bit memory bus. While the narrower bus reduces interface width, the move to 28 Gbps GDDR7 would raise total memory bandwidth to 336 GB/s, a roughly 5% increase, alongside a 12.5% boost in VRAM capacity. Core specifications are expected to remain unchanged. The card would continue to use the GB207 GPU, based on the Blackwell architecture, with 2560 CUDA cores and a 130 W TDP. No changes to clock speeds or core counts have been mentioned.

The report also claims NVIDIA is preparing adjustments higher up the stack. A revised GeForce RTX 5060 may transition to the larger GB205 die, currently used in the RTX 5070, in a cut-down configuration. That would reportedly reduce the GPU from 6144 CUDA cores and a 192-bit bus to 3840 cores and a 128-bit interface. Such a move would require board partners to adopt new PCBs compatible with GB205 and standard 8-pin power connectors. According to the leak, these changes are tied to supply constraints affecting lower-tier RTX 50-series GPUs, including the RTX 5050 and RTX 5060. The GeForce RTX 5060 12 GB, which appeared in earlier roadmaps, is now reportedly canceled.
Sources: Videocardz, MEGAsizeGPU
Add your own comment

126 Comments on NVIDIA Reportedly Preparing 9 GB GeForce RTX 5050 Variant with GDDR7

#1
RejZoR
Too weak to really run anything, given 9GB of VRAM so it looks better than RTX 5060 8GB when it runs out of VRAM. What the F is NVIDIA smoking these days?
Posted on Reply
#2
Tomgang
1 gb more. Why even brother. Still almost just as useless as 8 gb.

Rtx 5050 10 gb, rtx 5060 12 gb and RTX 5060 ti 16 gb. That i believe Would be a fitting amount of vram for exact tier of gpu.

But 9 gb. Meh....
Posted on Reply
#3
Krit
RejZoRWhat the F is NVIDIA smoking these days?
As always in last two generations they are milking those sheeps. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#4
Dragam1337
Tomgang1 gb more. Why even brother. Still almost just as useless as 8 gb.

Rtx 5050 10 gb, rtx 5060 12 gb and RTX 5060 ti 16 gb. That i believe Would be a fitting amount of vram for exact tier of gpu.

But 9 gb. Meh....
Why bother ? Cause they can reduce the bus = save money. That's all it's ever about.
Posted on Reply
#5
Youseethis
Why would they do this? Are the 3x 3gb gddr7 chips cheaper that 4x 2gb gddr6? Is the ga207 with only 96bit working, that common? Is salvaged 96bit ga207+9gb gddr7 cheaper than the current 5050?
Perhaps the pricing of this thing might be close to a 5060, but the current one is already close. So 290$ msrp?

It is bewildering.
Posted on Reply
#6
Lew Zealand
Almost all of those specs would be fine if they just changed one:

70W slot powered. That would make it a fine drop in gpu for an old office machine at $199-229.
Posted on Reply
#7
Krit
Lew Zealand70W slot powered. That would make it a fine drop in gpu for an old office machine at $199-229.
If a regular RTX 5050 is around 270€+ than this will be closer to 300€.
Posted on Reply
#8
Dragam1337
But what this does confirm is that nvidia doesn't lack gddr7 modules - they lack fab space at tsmc, due to booking it all for ai.
Posted on Reply
#9
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
YouseethisWhy would they do this? Are the 3x 3gb gddr7 chips cheaper that 4x 2gb gddr6?
Almost certainly. Draw less power too.
Posted on Reply
#10
dtoxic
What is this for? Candy Crush Saga with RTX On and DLSS???
Posted on Reply
#12
FR3D1
Ninja Cat
RejZoRToo weak to really run anything
No. She can play Pr0N (4K; right in the middle of it, instead of just watching!) smoothly.

With a friendly smile,
Fred.
Posted on Reply
#14
mrnagant
Lew ZealandAlmost all of those specs would be fine if they just changed one:

70W slot powered. That would make it a fine drop in gpu for an old office machine at $199-229.
This would be really nice. But that would require a 60W TDP decrease. You are asking for reduced CUDA cores and like half the clock speed.
Would be cool though if they launched the MX line on desktop to offer a card to keep within the power budget of PCIe.
YouseethisWhy would they do this? Are the 3x 3gb gddr7 chips cheaper that 4x 2gb gddr6? Is the ga207 with only 96bit working, that common? Is salvaged 96bit ga207+9gb gddr7 cheaper than the current 5050?
Perhaps the pricing of this thing might be close to a 5060, but the current one is already close. So 290$ msrp?

It is bewildering.
I wouldn't say it is bewildering.
3x GDDR7 chips might be cheaper. Maybe not.
PCB design costs should be cheaper.
Can charge more for a 5050 9GB model over a 5050 8GB model. Offsetting any potential price increases in parts. If part price is overall decrease, revenue per 5050 increases.
Memory shortages are wild, and having a card that has access to GDDR6 and GDDR7 memory can allow for an increase in availability of the 5050 series. Nvidia might need 5050 availabilities for OEMs.
Posted on Reply
#16
EsliteMoby
3X might be cheaper than 4X memory modules since it also cuts bandwidth down to 96 bit from 128 bit
Posted on Reply
#17
agent_x007
mrnagantThis would be really nice. But that would require a 60W TDP decrease. You are asking for reduced CUDA cores and like half the clock speed.
Would be cool though if they launched the MX line on desktop to offer a card to keep within the power budget of PCIe.


Managed to drop usual 5050 to ~82W whole card in non-power virus scenario :D (and still retaining boost clock)
Posted on Reply
#18
Fatloader
Idk why, but 9GB just seems weird. 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 all seem perfectly normal to me, but 9GB??? Maybe it's just because its an odd number in a usually even space.

Beyond that, why would anyone really buy a 9GB 5050? I doubt any games using more than 8GB VRAM are gonna be fine at 9GB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless it's cheaper, it won't be a useful product for most people.
Posted on Reply
#19
SoM6
e-waste fines for these people needs to be massive
Posted on Reply
#20
agent_x007
1) Because market doesn't talk enough about new NV products (hype is real motivation to change GPUs)
2) Because 24Gbit memory isn't used anywhere consumer grade... yet
3) Because nobody will buy this, it should last long enough on shelfs to be relevant (and be bombed on reviews due to short supply).
Posted on Reply
#21
Darc Requiem
*Checks calendar* Okay it's not April 1st. WTF Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#22
Unregistered
Tomgang1 gb more. Why even brother. Still almost just as useless as 8 gb.

Rtx 5050 10 gb, rtx 5060 12 gb and RTX 5060 ti 16 gb. That i believe Would be a fitting amount of vram for exact tier of gpu.

But 9 gb. Meh....
FatloaderIdk why, but 9GB just seems weird. 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 all seem perfectly normal to me, but 9GB??? Maybe it's just because its an odd number in a usually even space.

Beyond that, why would anyone really buy a 9GB 5050? I doubt any games using more than 8GB VRAM are gonna be fine at 9GB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless it's cheaper, it won't be a useful product for most people.
its 3 x 3gb modules, instead of 4 x 2gb modules. Allowing them to deal with the shortages better. Surely you can understand why less silicon for the same or increased capacity is a good thing.
#23
kabostebeztak
Shadowizedits 3 x 3gb modules, instead of 4 x 2gb modules. Allowing them to deal with the shortages better. Surely you can understand why less silicon for the same or increased capacity is a good thing.
the fact that a 50 class gpu has more memory than the 60 one is so funny
Posted on Reply
#24
Youseethis
kabostebeztakthe fact that a 50 class gpu has more memory than the 60 one is so funny
The 60 class having more memory than the 80 class and tying the 80ti was funnier :roll:
Posted on Reply
#25
RejZoR
FatloaderIdk why, but 9GB just seems weird. 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 all seem perfectly normal to me, but 9GB??? Maybe it's just because its an odd number in a usually even space.

Beyond that, why would anyone really buy a 9GB 5050? I doubt any games using more than 8GB VRAM are gonna be fine at 9GB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless it's cheaper, it won't be a useful product for most people.
Well, we had Radeon HD7950 with 3GB VRAM, RTX 1080Ti with 11GB and we also had RTX 3080 with 10GB which is also a rather weird number... it's just very odd choice for a weak ass GPU like RTX 5050 to 1GB up compared to RTX 5060 8GB for some reason. Like, why does this product even exists?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 21:31 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts