Thursday, March 12th 2026

Chinese Laptop Maker Chuwi Advertised AMD Ryzen 5 7430U SoC, but Shipped the Older Ryzen 5 5500U

Imagine buying a laptop, thinking you're getting a model with your desired CPU specifications, only to find a completely different model inside, cleverly concealed so you wouldn't notice without further investigation. According to an investigation by Notebookcheck, the Chinese electronics maker Chuwi is engaging in specification fraud. Users have discovered a different CPU SKU compared to what was advertised. In a review of the Chuwi CoreBook X and CoreBook Plus, Notebookcheck found that Chuwi had listed these laptops with an AMD Ryzen 5 7430U processor, but they actually come with an AMD Ryzen 5 5500U. This means that Chuwi is actively advertising these models on their website, on the laptop box, with laptop stickers, and even with BIOS modifications to make it seem as if they feature the newer Ryzen 5 7430U SoC with "Zen 3" CPU microarchitecture and Radeon "Vega 6" SoC. In reality, the company is shipping a processor that is a few generations old, with "Zen 2" CPU cores and Radeon Graphics 448SP.

Notebookcheck discovered this during a review of the Chuwi CoreBook X. The unit's performance was rather lackluster, prompting further investigation. Initially, they thought single-channel RAM was causing the subpar performance. To determine the true cause, they opened the unit and found the older Ryzen 5 5500U SoC with its corresponding part number 100-000000375. Additionally, other differences were noted in the SoC specifications, such as the L3 cache. Chuwi even went a step further by using a modified BIOS version to show that the unit features the AMD Ryzen 5 7430U. This led software diagnostic tools to display the advertised specification, while the lower-tier SoC was actually inside. This issue didn't occur just once with the Chuwi CoreBook X but also with a separate CoreBook Plus, which Notebookcheck also confirmed to feature the older SoC. Instead of the newer AMD Ryzen 5 7430U processor, both of these laptop models actually come with the AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, as verified through performance testing, and the OPN number that corresponds to a specific AMD chip.
Chuwi has reportedly stated that the issue is merely a production error, and after the investigation went further, threatened legal action against Notebookcheck for brand damage. The company has repeatedly requested the removal of the article, which Notebookcheck refused to do. Since Notebookcheck made a second discovery in the CoreBook Plus laptop, we are awaiting any possible response or statement from Chinese electronics maker Chuwi to clarify the situation and possibly reverse any damage.
Sources: NBC #1, NBC #2
Add your own comment

28 Comments on Chinese Laptop Maker Chuwi Advertised AMD Ryzen 5 7430U SoC, but Shipped the Older Ryzen 5 5500U

#1
LabRat 891
AleksandarKChuwi has reportedly stated that the issue is merely a production error, and after the investigation went further, threatened legal action against Notebookcheck for brand damage. The company has repeatedly requested the removal of the article, which Notebookcheck refused to do. Since Notebookcheck made a second discovery in the CoreBook Plus laptop, we are awaiting any possible response or statement from Chinese electronics maker Chuwi to clarify the situation and possibly reverse any damage.
Yes, rather than quietly fix the issue and recall/address-as-prompted affected units, let's blow up the situation.

Bold strategy...
Posted on Reply
#3
Athena
I mean, they went out of the way to modify the BIOS, so, how can they claim that this was a production issue?
Posted on Reply
#6
Apocalypsee
This doesn't seem like 'production error' if they go to extend modifying BIOS to spoof software to read as 7430U.
Posted on Reply
#7
Icon Charlie
ApocalypseeThis doesn't seem like 'production error' if they go to extend modifying BIOS to spoof software to read as 7430U.
Correct. This is why I do not buy any sort of Chinese Tech made products. These types of "Accidents" have been known. Especially over video card and SSD's/flash drives over the years.
Posted on Reply
#8
Darmok N Jalad
I guess they figured if AMD can rebrand old designs, why not them too?
Posted on Reply
#9
Luisds
Icon CharlieCorrect. This is why I do not buy any sort of Chinese Tech made products. These types of "Accidents" have been known. Especially over video card and SSD's/flash drives over the years.
Your MacBook is also made in China. Instead of worrying about this irrelevant issue, you should pay more attention to the brand. I have never seen this brand in China. Please buy a well-known product.
Posted on Reply
#10
z1tu
LuisdsYour MacBook is also made in China. Instead of worrying about this irrelevant issue, you should pay more attention to the brand. I have never seen this brand in China. Please buy a well-known product.
And yet, quality is light years ahead of any chinese brand
Posted on Reply
#11
JohH
And since it's typically a chore to return garbage to China, they probably would have gotten away with it except for that pesky NotebookCheck calling them out.
Posted on Reply
#12
wNotyarD
LuisdsI have never seen this brand in China.
I actually heard of Chuwi, there was a time they were popular with Atom-based tablets that dual booted Android and Windows. But it has been YEARS since I've last seen anything about them.
Posted on Reply
#13
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
Going as far as editing the bios is some "Production Error"

I wonder how many people bought the same laptop that are running with the same 5500U instead of the 7430U as advertised? Surely there are enough customers for a class action against Chuwi.
Posted on Reply
#14
Bwaze
Clearly just an error, as in "It was planned we won't get caught."
Posted on Reply
#15
regs
ApocalypseeThis doesn't seem like 'production error' if they go to extend modifying BIOS to spoof software to read as 7430U.
Since Zen 3 AMD left low budget market and no longer producing anything. So those Zen 2 and Zen 3 variations are available in masses and being installed in same notebook models by all manufacturers. It just depend on batches. It is highly possible that some batch could have leftover in the basket or accidental drop by human error.
LuisdsI have never seen this brand in China. Please buy a well-known product.
You didn't see properly, but Chuwi is well known worldwide, especially for low budget products. Your MacBook isn't a competitor in mass market. It doesn't even exist in mass market. It cost at least 3 times more and has severe software compatibility issues. Outside USA practicality of using MacBook is low.
Posted on Reply
#16
Quicks
Chinese electronics maker Chuwi, needs to be shut down. What a disgrace of a company.

AMD should also sue them for brand damage.
Posted on Reply
#17
Bwaze
regsSince Zen 3 AMD left low budget market and no longer producing anything. So those Zen 2 and Zen 3 variations are available in masses and being installed in same notebook models by all manufacturers. It just depend on batches. It is highly possible that some batch could have leftover in the basket or accidental drop by human error.
And they accidentally edited BIOS so it says 7430U instead of Ryzen 5 5500U? That can't happen by accident, BIOSes report what's installed by rule, not what was supposed to be installed.
Posted on Reply
#18
Roph
Darmok N JaladI guess they figured if AMD can rebrand old designs, why not them too?
Yep, AMD is notorious for this 🤣

I remember them offering in one of their SKUs "500 series" mobile radeon graphics (implying polaris, hevc encode etc) that was actually 28nm Cape verde (2011, HD 7770) rebranded *five times* :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#19
Joshreddevil
LabRat 891Yes, rather than quietly fix the issue and recall/address-as-prompted affected units, let's blow up the situation.

Bold strategy...
Have they heard of the Streisand effect?
Posted on Reply
#20
Bwaze
"Chuwi has reportedly stated that the issue is merely a production error, and after the investigation went further, threatened legal action against Notebookcheck for brand damage."

Yeah, it doesn't matter if it's true, that is brand damage! Kind of like Dubai now throwing people in jail for taking videos of Iranian drone strikes - "using an information network or information technology tool to broadcast, publish, republish or circulate false news, rumours or provocative propaganda that may incite public opinion or disturb public security" also applies to witnessing and recording true events that the government finds damaging.
Posted on Reply
#21
HLB
RophYep, AMD is notorious for this 🤣

I remember them offering in one of their SKUs "500 series" mobile radeon graphics (implying polaris, hevc encode etc) that was actually 28nm Cape verde (2011, HD 7770) rebranded *five times* :kookoo:
Crucial did something along those lines too several times, replacing controllers and memory in their SSDs once they received good reviews and they didn't even rebrand them, same model, different components. I bought a 2TB T500 and it was a decent SSD. Two years later I bought a 4TB T500 and it was garbage, completely different SSD, swapped components and half the cache, or worse, 1/3 performance of the 2TB model. I think few others did that too, this isn't unique to Chinese companies.
Posted on Reply
#22
Bwaze
HenryLootgraabCrucial did something along those lines too several times, replacing controllers and memory in their SSDs once they received good reviews and they didn't even rebrand them, same model, different components. I bought a 2TB T500 and it was a decent SSD. Two years later I bought a 4TB T500 and it was garbage, completely different SSD, swapped components and half the cache, or worse, 1/3 performance of the 2TB model. I think few others did that too, this isn't unique to Chinese companies.
A lot of brands did this - some right after the initial reviews, so almost no one received the product as hyped. And when accused they merely pointed out that the replaced components still offer (more or less) the advertised specifications, and that they don't have any obligation to continue offering the same performance as reviewed - they even have the finer print on how they are of course permitted to change components as they see fit, it's not false advertising because we say it isn't.
Posted on Reply
#23
cfenton
Bwaze"Chuwi has reportedly stated that the issue is merely a production error, and after the investigation went further, threatened legal action against Notebookcheck for brand damage."

Yeah, it doesn't matter if it's true, that is brand damage! Kind of like Dubai now throwing people in jail for taking videos of Iranian drone strikes - "using an information network or information technology tool to broadcast, publish, republish or circulate false news, rumours or provocative propaganda that may incite public opinion or disturb public security" also applies to witnessing and recording true events that the government finds damaging.
I don't know where Notebookcheck is based, but in any reasonable legal system truth is the best defense against any claims of defamation.
Posted on Reply
#24
Squared
Making a custom BIOS to help cover up selling an old low-end CPU as a slightly newer low-end CPU is unscrupulous.
Posted on Reply
#25
7777777
wNotyarDI actually heard of Chuwi, there was a time they were popular with Atom-based tablets that dual booted Android and Windows. But it has been YEARS since I've last seen anything about them.
yep, and I had the displeasure of having one of them. Absolute trash. Great spec on paper, cheap materials used, horrible bios execution, a lot of workarounds applied instead of getting the software sorted, it was really bad. Not all pure Chinese makers are like this, there are quite a few good ones.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 04:14 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts