Thursday, July 9th 2026

AMD Confirms EPYC "Venice" Zen 6 CPUs Launch on July 22-23 at Advancing AI Event

AMD CTO Mark Papermaster has confirmed that EPYC "Venice," the company's first Zen 6 server CPU, will be officially introduced at AMD's Advancing AI event on July 22nd and 23rd. In a recent interview, Papermaster described the upcoming CPUs as optimized for traditional x86 enterprise workloads, noting that enterprise customers aren't moving away from x86. EPYC "Venice" is built on TSMC's 2 nm process, making it the first high-performance computing processor to reach production on that node. Currently, manufacturing is ramping in Taiwan, as AMD announced back in May, with future production planned at TSMC's Arizona facility. The flagship configuration goes up to 256 Zen 6 cores, a 33% jump over the current 192-core EPYC "Turin" lineup. AMD claims over 70% higher performance and efficiency compared to the Zen 5-based predecessor.

On the platform side, "Venice" moves to the new SP7 socket with 16-channel memory support delivering up to 1.6 TB/s of bandwidth, and adopts PCIe Gen 6 for improved CPU-to-GPU communication. This is mostly relevant for the AI accelerator workloads that the EPYC "Venice" Zen 6 CPUs are targeting alongside traditional x86 tasks. These CPUs when installed in Helios racks, will be paired with new AMD Instinct MI455 GPUs. If you're wondering about the mainstream Zen 6 desktop and mobile chips, those are a separate story. Related to those, there's no shortage of rumors and leaks, whether we are talking about the confirmed Ryzen Threadripper TR6 "Mustang Peak", the Ryzen 10000 series "Olympic Ridge" or the "Medusa Point" APUs. However, consumer parts aren't expected before the end of the year at the earliest, with CES 2027 in January being the most likely debut window.
AMD's Mark Papermaster - Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President"I'll say for me, every enterprise conversation I'm having now, this comes up. Because enterprises have, you know, decades of running x86. They're not going to move that install base. And what we've done at AMD, you know, since we launched the new Zen processor back in 2017. We're now on our sixth generation. So, at our Advancing AI event on July 22nd and 23rd, we're rolling out this new generation. You know, it continues the kind of leadership x86 CPU, but it's designed in such a way that it matches what I just described a moment ago. It's optimized for standalone x86 traditional workloads."
Sources: Wccftech, Overclock3d
Add your own comment

36 Comments on AMD Confirms EPYC "Venice" Zen 6 CPUs Launch on July 22-23 at Advancing AI Event

#2
Athena
I wonder what they are going to charge for this beast?
If they were smart, they wouldn't charge more than the current Epyc flagship, since it requires a new socket
Posted on Reply
#3
user556
Certainly early announce. Major reversal on historical order where the desktop part was usually well ahead of all else.
Posted on Reply
#4
Chaitanya
So now enterprizes are going to be beta testers.
Posted on Reply
#5
freeagent
ChaitanyaSo now enterprizes are going to be beta testers.
Better them than us..
Posted on Reply
#6
AsRock
TPU addict
ChaitanyaSo now enterprizes are going to be beta testers.
Let them i say, not as most other people need it so.

I'll wait on ebay for a good deal.
Posted on Reply
#7
Wirko
ChaitanyaSo now enterprizes are going to be beta testers.
They want the new hardware NOW!, and a few erroneous calculations here and there won't hurt training and inferencing much.
Posted on Reply
#8
ymdhis
Announcement on July 22-23, paper launch on CES 2027 in January, availability some time middle of 2027.
Posted on Reply
#9
_roman_
I see it that way. Zen6 exists and the e-waste will than be sold for desktop consumers.

I have the feeling my lying around ryzen 7600x clocks much better as it has 2 defective cores vs the ryzen 7700x I bought. I assume, I'm certain AMD put the good silicon on the server parts and the e-waste ones on the consumer front.

Do not worry your E-waste will arrive later on the desktop. E-waste in regards of the quality of the yield of the wafer

Only time will tell. Anyway AMD needs a way to get rid of the bad performing cores and the cores with partly defects

MAybe we will get more cpu instructions because of the "AI" whatever feature inside.
Posted on Reply
#10
LittleBro
ymdhisAnnouncement on July 22-23, paper launch on CES 2027 in January, availability some time middle of 2027.
Except AMD is not Intel. For the last 3 generations, I remember AMD CPUs were in stock on the launch date.
Posted on Reply
#11
Tek-Check
The top SKU with 256c cores will absolutely crush everything currently available in the server market.
_roman_I assume, I'm certain AMD put the good silicon on the server parts and the e-waste ones on the consumer front.
Pure stupidity to say that. Desktop CCDs will have much higher clocks.
_roman_Do not worry your E-waste will arrive later on the desktop. E-waste in regards of the quality of the yield of the wafer
What are you talking about dude? The launch will predominantly feature c core SKUs with CCD featuring 32c cores. Those are not coming to desktop.
ymdhisAnnouncement on July 22-23, paper launch on CES 2027 in January, availability some time middle of 2027.
What is this nonsense about?
AthenaI wonder what they are going to charge for this beast?
If they were smart, they wouldn't charge more than the current Epyc flagship, since it requires a new socket
They are both smart and they will charge more because the new platform will crush all CPU platforms that are currently available on the market. My initial idea is that 256c core SKU will cost around $17-20K.
user556Certainly early announce. Major reversal on historical order where the desktop part was usually well ahead of all else.
This will mostly be the launch of c core EPYCs for Helios rack. Those SKUs with 32c core CCD are fundamentally different from other 12 core CCDs that are produced on a separate production run.
Posted on Reply
#12
mkppo
Yeah from what I hear, Zen 6/6c will pretty much destroy anything else on the market in server workloads and the new memory controller is effing wild. It seems like they finally have a good handle on how to design a stupid fast IMC. Too bad the desktop IMC's are a generation behind, but Zen 6 desktop will also get a cut down variant of Zen 5 server's IMC which is still leaps and bounds ahead of the archaic IMC on Zen 5 desktop.

I'm assuming 1H 2027 launch for Zen 6 Desktop.
Posted on Reply
#13
Tek-Check
mkppoToo bad the desktop IMC's are a generation behind, but Zen 6 desktop will also get a cut down variant of Zen 5 server's IMC which is still leaps and bounds ahead of the archaic IMC on Zen 5 desktop.
Not really. Officially, Zen5 EPYC systems were originally certified for 6000 MT/s, which is often a sweet spot for desktop systems. More recent EPYC systems and Threadripper are certified at 6400 MT/s. So, improvements are incremental.

Zen6 EPYC is said to run MRDIMMs at up to 12,800 MT/s, but that's a completely different memory configuration for servers. Normal DIMMs could run up to around ~8000 MT/s
Posted on Reply
#14
kondamin
it's going to change server density once again.
Prices are going to be brutal the first months
Posted on Reply
#15
_roman_
Tek-CheckPure stupidity to say that. Desktop CCDs will have much higher clocks.
It's interesting that you claim the best silicon goes to the consumer who pays less and not to the server market. When your argument is stupidity than it is information based ... not an argument. What are you going to tell me from the information base level? No argument? Bad mood?

So your metric is higher clock? That's it?

My metric is power efficiency, cpu instructions and less compile times. (i am surre that needs to be said in clear text = less!)
Why do server cpu clock with fewer clocks? How many cores? (i do not need an answer for that, these are question to comprehend the topic for those upvoters)

I highly doubt Server CPUS and Desktop CPUs will not be again build on the same building blocks. that is a monetary and yield per wafer decision.
Posted on Reply
#16
Tek-Check
_roman_It's interesting that you claim the best silicon goes to the consumer who pays less and not to the server market.
I didn't say that. You are literally putting words into my mouth.

I said it's a stupid thing to claim that desktop parts would get what you called "e-waste". Pure and generic nonsense. Meaningless idea. A bad tech joke.
Posted on Reply
#17
XeonsNOpterons
This is very interesting, usually desktop launches first from AMD then server then workstation. Would love to see how many pins SP7 has in the presentation and just truly how much of a clock speed boost Zen 6 has. Venice will be a clear indicator if the rumors that desktop Zen 6 will hit 6.5+ GHz are true. Also want to see the power draw of these chips, I doubt any lower than 600W for the top SKUs.
Posted on Reply
#18
HueSplat
I am confused as to why AMD is reusing codenames, they already used Venice for a CPU in 2005.

I did a double take to make sure I read it correctly.

Maybe DFI can make some UV reactive boards for the “new Venice”.
Posted on Reply
#19
Tek-Check
HueSplatI am confused as to why AMD is reusing codenames, they already used Venice for a CPU in 2005.
This is EPYC Venice.
XeonsNOpteronsWould love to see how many pins SP7 has in the presentation
This has been leaked already. Try to find it. SP7 features around 7400 pins and SP8 around 5570 pins.
XeonsNOpteronsand just truly how much of a clock speed boost Zen 6 has. Venice will be a clear indicator if the rumors that desktop Zen 6 will hit 6.5+ GHz are true.
If AMD launches EPYCs with Zen 6c cores only in 10 days time, we will find this out. We need to see advancements in clock speed for EPYCs based on 12 core CCD to be able to guestimate what could happen on desktop.
XeonsNOpteronsAlso want to see the power draw of these chips, I doubt any lower than 600W for the top SKUs.
Around 600W was leaked.
Posted on Reply
#20
twin_savage
HueSplatMaybe DFI can make some UV reactive boards for the “new Venice”.
They just might, they recently started producing boards for Siena and Sorano this year.
Tek-CheckAround 600W was leaked.
There were some OCP APAC Summit slides from TMC that implied SP7 was in the 700-1,400 watt range, hardly a smoking gun but it is evidence.
Posted on Reply
#21
Dukenukemx
AthenaI wonder what they are going to charge for this beast?
If they were smart, they wouldn't charge more than the current Epyc flagship, since it requires a new socket
This is likely for AI servers, which means you need Epstein Island levels of money.
Posted on Reply
#22
XeonsNOpterons
Tek-CheckThis has been leaked already. Try to find it. SP7 features around 7400 pins and SP8 around 5570 pins.
Huh, did not see SP7's leak. That pin count seems about right though!
Tek-CheckIf AMD launches EPYCs with Zen 6c cores only in 10 days time, we will find this out. We need to see advancements in clock speed for EPYCs based on 12 core CCD to be able to guestimate what could happen on desktop.
Well, you can also estimate based on the 32-core Zen 6c CCDs. But Venice will have both Zen 6 and Zen 6c variants, so we will see both.
twin_savageThere were some OCP APAC Summit slides from TMC that implied SP7 was in the 700-1,400 watt range, hardly a smoking gun but it is evidence.
Yeah, I actually recall the 1400W figure somewhere too, but I think that is way too high. No way the workstation platform will have the same socket, so no sense to be able to supply that much power.
Posted on Reply
#23
Tek-Check
XeonsNOpteronsHuh, did not see SP7's leak.
There was an article around Computex showing the SP7 socket designed by a Taiwanese company of I ak not mistaken. I have the exact pin number at home.
XeonsNOpteronsWell, you can also estimate based on the 32-core Zen 6c CCDs. But Venice will have both Zen 6 and Zen 6c variants, so we will see both.
It's unclear whether both versions would launch on July 22nd. I suspect not, as those CCDs are on slightly different N2 nodes and different production runs. It might be the case that EPYCs with 12 core CCD could arrive a few months later. We'll see. My impression is that they aim push first flagship EPYCs with Zen 6c cores.
XeonsNOpteronsI actually recall the 1400W figure somewhere too, but I think that is way too high. No way the workstation platform will have the same socket, so no sense to be able to supply that much power.
This is for 2P sustems.
Posted on Reply
#24
HueSplat
Tek-CheckThis is EPYC Venice.
It’s still a codename for an AMD processor that already exists.

In some situations It’s going to be annoying when searching for specifics even when adding EPYC or Athlon to the search terms.

When Google searching “AMD Athlon Venice” for example, I’m already seeing results for Zen6/EPYC within the top 10 results.
It will just end up getting worse as more info, posts, benchmarks, etc, become available.

Sure, you can change terms and work around it.
Would just be nice if it was actually a completely unique codename.
Posted on Reply
#25
mkppo
Tek-CheckNot really. Officially, Zen5 EPYC systems were originally certified for 6000 MT/s, which is often a sweet spot for desktop systems. More recent EPYC systems and Threadripper are certified at 6400 MT/s. So, improvements are incremental.

Zen6 EPYC is said to run MRDIMMs at up to 12,800 MT/s, but that's a completely different memory configuration for servers. Normal DIMMs could run up to around ~8000 MT/s
Zen 5 server does 6400 MT/s over 12 channels, Zen desktop does 6000 MT/s over two. But yeah Zen 6 will bring a much needed upgrade on both the desktop and server parts
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 07:05 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts