Sunday, July 12th 2026
AMD FSR Multi-Frame Generation With Up to 8x Mode in Development
AMD has reportedly been testing a new and highly anticipated FSR multi-frame generation (MFG) technology for its Radeon RX GPUs. This information comes from a third-party software called RadeonTuner, which allows access to Radeon driver settings without using the AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition application. RadeonTuner has revealed that AMD is already incorporating preliminary support for multi-frame generation into its Radeon drivers, though the feature remains hidden until the software is finalized. According to the tool's developer, AMD often places placeholders for features like this well in advance of their release, indicating that the company is extensively testing the multi-frame generation feature with options for 1x to 8x variants, which are expected to be available once the feature is fully developed.
One user attempted to enable the multi-frame generation feature using the latest driver installation and a Radeon RX 9060 XT graphics card to see if it could work with any game. However, the user discovered that the feature is currently non-functional, as AMD has not yet released the necessary model to support multi-frame generation at any setting. This suggests that only the placeholder for the feature has been included, with no underlying driver support to make it operational. Even when testing games that frequently receive FSR updates, such as Forza Horizon 6, Pragmata, Resident Evil 9, Crimson Desert, and Death Stranding 2, the feature could not be activated. It seems we are still months away from the final release of multi-frame generation support.
It's worth noting that AMD is late to the MFG game, as NVIDIA has already released its DLSS Dynamic MFG feature with up to 6x generation capability, and Intel has been offering XeSS MFG with a 4x setting for several months as part of the XeSS 3 release. Additionally, AMD GPUs currently lack hardware-based flip metering for frame pacing, relying instead on software pacing to maintain consistent frame generation. Therefore, it makes sense for MFG to be included in the current Radeon RX 9000 series and potentially in future RDNA 5 / UDNA GPU IP if they incorporate dedicated hardware-based flip metering for frame pacing.
Sources:
Chiphell, RadeonTuner
One user attempted to enable the multi-frame generation feature using the latest driver installation and a Radeon RX 9060 XT graphics card to see if it could work with any game. However, the user discovered that the feature is currently non-functional, as AMD has not yet released the necessary model to support multi-frame generation at any setting. This suggests that only the placeholder for the feature has been included, with no underlying driver support to make it operational. Even when testing games that frequently receive FSR updates, such as Forza Horizon 6, Pragmata, Resident Evil 9, Crimson Desert, and Death Stranding 2, the feature could not be activated. It seems we are still months away from the final release of multi-frame generation support.
78 Comments on AMD FSR Multi-Frame Generation With Up to 8x Mode in Development
Service charge: $40 per message. Wax seal available at extra cost.
Just don't bloody shoot the messengerWeird ain't it. Nowadays we're getting heightened up rendering which comes at a hefty cost and in return the games don't even look the part. UE5 seems to be one of the regular offenders.
I had a quick look at some gameplay and perf monitoring. Its a tanker. It seems rather stuttery so I'm guessing the PC version still needs quite a bit of optimisation and some shoe polishing.
EG1. Lowest i've seen across both EU and the US is exactly 600$ - the equivalent of ~545€.
You shit on Nvidia for MFG, so shit on AMD right?
Why you ask me a question if you already decided that you're not gonna accept my answer way before asking is beyond me.
Who's pushing frame gen now?????
Edit: No 7900 XTX owner in their right mind bought a 9070 XT. Ever. The 9070 XT is a midrange card. The same way you don't "upgrade" a 4090 to a 5070 Ti.
Although I guess it's bad because it's AMD that you get an improvement in RT and upscaling with the 9070XT, except that is what the 50 series is as well.
Oh, and yes Nvidia is the one pushing frame gen over providing real performance increases, AMD is being forced to follow otherwise people would still complain.
Didn't say someone replaced his 7900xt with a 9070xt. Im saying if the 9070xt sells a lot more (which it probably does?) than the 7900xt - a 2 year old newer gpu with less vram with the only obvious upsides being upscaling and RT - well the message is very clear imo. It seems AMD agrees with that message, that's why they are pushing upscaling and x8 hallucination frames instead of actual hardware upgrades
Why is it such a big shock that the 9070 XT isn't just slightly better, but also a lot cheaper than the 7900 XT? Better and cheaper cards sell more, right? Right? :confused:
Last gen's closest unit in price is the 7900 GRE at $549 MSRP, which came with the same 16 GB VRAM, measurably worse performance, much worse RT, and no worldwide availability.
So... what were we talking about again? :rolleyes:
pcpartpicker.com/product/8ZJBD3/powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070-xt-16-gb-video-card-rx9070xt-16g-a?history_days=730
pcpartpicker.com/product/7dNxFT/xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt-20-gb-video-card-rx-79tmercu9?history_days=730
As you can see from the graphs besides a one week period where the 9070xt was selling for 599$ it was more expensive for the rest of it's lifetime. Until April of 2025 you could find the 7900XT for 679 or less while the 9070xt was between 710 and 810 for the whole of 2025.
Anyways, im out, amd is already convinced and agrees with me, hence they are pushing hallucination x8 frames.
The Powercolor 9070XT reaper sells for $689 and is slightly faster, with better ray tracing and upscaling. I don't understand why it's such a surprise that a 9070XT is cheaper and faster, or why it's so hard to admit that AMD had to add frame gen or people especially the loudest green brand buyers would still complain anyway that AMD doesn't have the same features.
I suppose it comes as a shock that a new card can be faster and cheaper than previous gen, since Nvidia doesn't do the same with the 5070Ti being $900-1000 since they cut supply to sell more hardware to AI datacenters.
I dont mind framegen - and good for amd to listen to it's customers and push RT and hallucination frames - but when your fastest card is below 2022 levels of performance your priorities are off.
Yes, RT performance got up and upscaling will be handled better.
20 or 24 GB versus 16 GB - right now, I don't have any usecase where I needed more than 16 GB.
Talking about bandwidth, yes 320 bit / 384 bit are better than only 256 bit.
Pure raster performance - the XT and XTX will win.
Hmmm... lets say, I come from a 6700XT (launch price 479 USD (good joke) in march 2021).
Today june 15'th offerings. Known resellers and no eBay.
So depending on where you live and what you want to do with your investment (playing games or rendering videos to name a few) there's not a clear winner.
In germany, it would be a hard decission. 649.00 EUR vs 679.90 EUR
In the US 689.99 vs 929.99.
It's your money and you know best, what you want to do with your investment.
And as can be seen in this thread, as usual the same people complaining of lacking features hop into AMD threads to mock AMD for following their favorite brand, probably from frustration that in reality they can't bash AMD for not having those features.Except I'm not talking about launch price, I'm referring to current pricing, which the 9070XT is cheaper than any available 7900XT I can buy right now not on the used market.
The 9070XT has less VRAM than a 7900XTX or 7900XT, it's up to the consumer if they feel the amount of VRAM is worth it however I wouldn't expect anyone to go from a 7900XT/XTX to a 9070XT.
And the card from last gen with a similar mid range price would've been the 7900GRE, same 16GB VRAM amount, $549 MSRP, for $50 more in terms of MSRP the 9070XT would be a decent upgrade being 33% faster in relative performance. A 9070XT also sells for about $300 less than a 5070Ti, but how dare anyone compare a Radeon card to what Nvidia has on the market.
I also thought cards selling was a good thing, apparently the 7900XTX didn't sell so AMD decided to focus on mid range, focusing on what sells is a good priority to have IMO.
But let's be frank here, there are only red fans complaining on everything that nvidia is involved in. Come on, you know it. :pWell duuuh, obviously currently it's cheaper since the 7900xt isn't being made anymore. The point was that for the majority of it's existence the 7900xt was cheaper, had more vram but sold way less than the 9070xt. That's because it was lacking in RT and upscaling, rdna 4 fixed that and added a bunch of hallucination frames and people bought it. So amd buyers prefer RT - upscaling - hallucination frames over vram and raster even though they pretend in every thread it's not the case. Sales speak for themselves.
But even if we work with your prices, which card would you buy? One that has 20 GB VRAM for $679, or the one that's considerably faster, more efficient, has better RT and upscaling, and is more modern for $710? If we look at the past, why would you waste your money on a 7900 XT when the 9070 XT is just around the corner with a rumoured 5-600 MSRP? And even earlier, when it wasn't rumoured, the 7900 XT was way more expensive.
If you find a 7900 XT cheaper than a 9070 XT, that's only because it's an old card, and not because it was cheaper to begin with. It is not the 9070 XT's predecessor.
New card is faster, old card depreciates to match value. Also, midrange sells better than high end (even old high end). This is how things have always been. Why do we even need to argue about this? :confused: