Wednesday, August 19th 2026

Intel Core Ultra 9 4950K Could Signal New Naming Scheme for "Nova Lake-S"

Intel's upcoming desktop CPU generation, part of the "Nova Lake-S" processor family, might adopt a new naming convention that returns to a four-digit format, unlike the current three-digit format used in the "Arrow Lake" family. According to a leaked CPU-Z submission, Intel's Core Ultra 9 4950K has been identified as a 28-core "Nova Lake-S" desktop chip. It features 8 "Coyote Cove" P-Cores, 16 "Arctic Wolf" E-Cores, and 4 LPE-Cores. This chip was tested on an unknown Z990 high-end overclocking platform, where it achieved over 1,000 points in single-core CPU-Z rankings and exceeded 20,000 points in multicore performance. This performance surpasses any consumer-focused desktop CPU currently available.

Despite this information, it's still uncertain if the naming convention is final. Intel is testing many SKUs for "Nova Lake-S," and a four-digit naming could be necessary due to the numerous SKUs and configurations. Some leakers, like Golden Pig Upgrade and Gotou_3rd, have suggested that the four-digit naming is a possibility, leaving room for speculation. Interestingly, qualification samples for NVL-S have not yet started shipping, but we can expect these shipments in the coming weeks, before manufacturers and motherboard makers begin integrating the latest CPU generation into their products.
Just days ago, Intel was spotted testing two SKUs—a 24-core model running at 3.4 GHz and a 28-core model running at 3.2 GHz—both featuring AVX-512 and APX instruction support. This aligns with the 28-core model we are seeing today. The 28-core "Nova Lake-S" DS version, a new SKU segment, is expected to launch in Q1 of 2027. For the regular overclocking-focused "K" SKUs, Intel reportedly plans an early Q2 launch between March and April, while the 52-core flagship SKU is expected to appear in late May.
Sources: LC Tech Leaks, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

58 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 9 4950K Could Signal New Naming Scheme for "Nova Lake-S"

#51
epicsithtrooper
XeonsNOpteronsPerformance is very impressive… the naming however leaves something to be desired. It is not terrible if it came about after multiple generations following the 3-digit scheme. But it is coming after a single 3-digit generation on desktop. Very dumb, I hope Intel changes it, but I doubt it considering launch is only 4-6 months away.

In the end naming does not matter much, and this performance is very good. Just need more information on if this is stock or overclocked and what speeds it is running. My bets are this is stock frequencies.
It does come after multiple generations of 3 digit naming schemes. I understand that you said "on desktop" but before this Core Ultra processors have only ever had 3 digit naming schemes.
Core ultra 1x5 (Meteor Lake)
Core ultra 2xxV (lunar lake)
Core ultra 2xx (Arrow Lake)
Core 3xx (Wildcat lake)
Core Ultra 3xx (Panther lake)
Posted on Reply
#52
XeonsNOpterons
epicsithtrooperIt does come after multiple generations of 3 digit naming schemes. I understand that you said "on desktop" but before this Core Ultra processors have only ever had 3 digit naming schemes.
Core ultra 1x5 (Meteor Lake)
Core ultra 2xxV (lunar lake)
Core ultra 2xx (Arrow Lake)
Core 3xx (Wildcat lake)
Core Ultra 3xx (Panther lake)
Fair enough, I guess I just more so mean to the desktop user it is the only 3-digit scheme. To be honest, I did not even know about Meteor Lake or Lunar Lake until about a year ago lol.
Posted on Reply
#53
GovX
Good job intel on making a worse naming scheme than AMD's 7000 and 8000 mobile series where 7000 was for 2023, xx40 meant zen 4, xx30 zen 3, etc, even though several 7000 SKUs under that naming scheme launched in 2022 and several 8000 processors in 2023. Anyways Intel's 4950K being the 28 Core is brilliant marketing because it maxes out their naming scheme for no reason, remember they still have the bLLC version (4950D?) and the HEDT models (44C 4960DX?) and (52C 4970DX?). The shouldve just sticked with the three digit numbers so the customers actually know what theyre buying, but lets not forget that they gave us beautiful names like Core Ultra X9 378H. IMO they should just wipe the entire naming scheme and start over because this is too messy.
A Computer GuyCould be worse. They could call it "Dual Edition" for no apparent reason after putting 2 at the end of the model number.
Dont give them ideas.
mrnagantFirst two digits = generation, 3rd digit multiple of 2 for P cores, 4th digit multiple of 4 for E cores, and 5th digit multiple of 2 + 2 for LE cores.

Intel - 16420 (18 cores)

16 - gen
4 - 8P cores
2 - 8E cores
0 - 2LE cores

Intel - 17651 (36 cores)

17 - gen
6 - 12P cores
5 - 20E cores
1 - 4LE cores

Intel - 18820 (26 cores)
18 - gen
8 - 16P cores
2 - 8E cores
0 - 2LE cores

I solved the problem. Problem solved. I will be billing my consultation fee to Intel.
Or do it how monitor names do it
Intel Core Ultra MAX Series 4 DX4P16E32L4XE2-P50E43L29XE24K-B288
DX4 - Dual Tile, 4th gen
P16E32L4XE2 - 16P/32E/4LP-E 2 Xe
P50E43L29E24K - Unlocked, up to 5.0GHz P, 4.3 GHz E, 2.9 GHz LP-E, 2.4 GHz Xe
B288 - bLLC enabled, 288MB cache
Posted on Reply
#54
wNotyarD
XeonsNOpteronsFair enough, I guess I just more so mean to the desktop user it is the only 3-digit scheme. To be honest, I did not even know about Meteor Lake or Lunar Lake until about a year ago lol.
For someone nicknamed "XeonsNOpterons" that makes absolute sense, both MTL and LNL are mobile-only, there's no Xeon :laugh:
I think there were Redwood Cove Xeons, though. That'd be the same P-core as Mountain Lake.
Posted on Reply
#55
XeonsNOpterons
wNotyarDFor someone nicknamed "XeonsNOpterons" that makes absolute sense, both MTL and LNL are mobile-only, there's no Xeon :laugh:
I think there were Redwood Cove Xeons, though. That'd be the same P-core as Mountain Lake.
Lol, good point. And yes, there are Redwood Cove Xeons, I have one of them. Waiting anxiously for Diamond Rapids to see what Panther Cove-X brings for my potential future CFD workstation in 2028 ;)
Posted on Reply
#56
Tyler-98-W68
Some people sure get out of joint over a stupid name. They could name it anything in the world and I could care less, if the performance is great its irrelevant what its called
Posted on Reply
#57
matar
Names means nothing performance is what we want and bring back SMT. the whole ultra thing was a bad choice nothing ultra about it intel Core i9 i7 i5 was perfect all we had to say was i9-i7 or i5-i3
Posted on Reply
#58
konataVT
AleksandarKIntel's upcoming desktop CPU generation, part of the "Nova Lake-S" processor family, might adopt a new naming convention that returns to a four-digit format, unlike the current three-digit format used in the "Arrow Lake" family. According to a leaked CPU-Z submission, Intel's Core Ultra 9 4950K has been identified as a 28-core "Nova Lake-S" desktop chip. It features 8 "Coyote Cove" P-Cores, 16 "Arctic Wolf" E-Cores, and 4 LPE-Cores. This chip was tested on an unknown Z990 high-end overclocking platform, where it achieved over 1,000 points in single-core CPU-Z rankings and exceeded 20,000 points in multicore performance. This performance surpasses any consumer-focused desktop CPU currently available.

Despite this information, it's still uncertain if the naming convention is final. Intel is testing many SKUs for "Nova Lake-S," and a four-digit naming could be necessary due to the numerous SKUs and configurations. Some leakers, like Golden Pig Upgrade and Gotou_3rd, have suggested that the four-digit naming is a possibility, leaving room for speculation. Interestingly, qualification samples for NVL-S have not yet started shipping, but we can expect these shipments in the coming weeks, before manufacturers and motherboard makers begin integrating the latest CPU generation into their products.

Just days ago, Intel was spotted testing two SKUs—a 24-core model running at 3.4 GHz and a 28-core model running at 3.2 GHz—both featuring AVX-512 and APX instruction support. This aligns with the 28-core model we are seeing today. The 28-core "Nova Lake-S" DS version, a new SKU segment, is expected to launch in Q1 of 2027. For the regular overclocking-focused "K" SKUs, Intel reportedly plans an early Q2 launch between March and April, while the 52-core flagship SKU is expected to appear in late May.
lol devil canyon revival. would love to see it, peak naming SKU was sandy bridge era with 2960XM and the sort.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 06:33 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts