Tuesday, October 6th 2026
Xbox Helix Will Be "a Great Console First" With Portable Play in Mind, Says CEO
Xbox CEO Asha Sharma has reportedly told staff that the next-generation "Project Helix" hardware will lead with a home console, with portable play apparently coming as part of the same lineup. The remarks come from an internal town hall, and Windows Central says it obtained and verified a transcript. Helix was already known to be a "family of devices" instead of a single box, but this is the clearest hint so far about what else is in that family. Here's what she said:
Source:
Windows Central
We are moving to a family of devices for Gen-10. There is not one device that fits all. We will certainly have a great console first, but we also know that many players will be on the go. There are some things that we are the best in the world to manufacture, and there are other things that we will partner on. So, we will be sharing more about that as our plans develop. The operating system is starting to look really good. We're very excited about this.Sharma didn't use the word handheld, so that part is an inference, though it's hard to read "on the go" any other way. It seems likely that a portable Helix device would fall into the "things we will have to partner on" group, since Microsoft already works with ASUS on the ROG Xbox Ally handhelds. However, nothing from Sharma today confirms who builds what. Helix is meant to run both Xbox console games and PC games on a custom AMD chip, so the operating system bit is also important. There's still no price or launch date, and dev kits aren't expected before 2027, so a consumer release is probably some way off.


29 Comments on Xbox Helix Will Be "a Great Console First" With Portable Play in Mind, Says CEO
So please stop grinning like that and get lost!How many versions and re-releases were there of the Xbox 360 alone?
Yes, it's easy to lose track of things.You mean Horizon? Because motorsport was already dead before the remake was released.
Regards,
Fred.
Corrupt; source?
I'd be susceptible to bribery for a TPU-designed mug, though. So there seems to be nothing wrong with it.
Regards,
Fred.
Project Helix will have higher BOM than Series X unless RAM and storage drops to original prices, so the likelihood of that price is pretty much zero.
Steam Machine already costs $1049 and It's weaker than even Series X, so I don't see a reason why Project Helix should cost less than SM.
I can agree that If It's limited to only Xbox games It wouldn't be worth It, but If they will allow PC gaming then that changes everything.
Although I can't imagine they would allow Steam, GOG or Epic to be installed on It. and jeopardize their own digital sales.
btw: last MS console I owned was a XB360, the model that would break inevitably after some use, so I don't really care about the XBox brand since I play 99% of the time on PC. It would be wise to make a normal X86 PC with Windows "made for Gaming" or something similar to SteamOS.
Knowing Microsoft, they'll make a low power, low performance console focused only on playing games via Cloud and streaming, everything blocked with encryption and whatnot.
They will just release a 'family of devices', so business as usual if you include their faltering strategy of 'Xbox will be everywhere and you can play whatever you want'
Asha has used a lot of positive words to describe they haven't got a fucking clue where this is going other than what they've already done before. But the OS is coming along great! Just like their steady improvements to Win 11 eh.
DOA.
Microsoft and Sony still do not show that they understand the core concept of console gaming. Its not about the machine. Its all about the content and its quality and quantity. NOWHERE do we hear 'we need this new hardware because game X/Y. That is all we need to know. This machine exists to make money, not to deliver awesome content. We already have awesome content and they've been very busy rehashing that in various ways, irrespective of what console or PC you play on.
Sony and Nintendo's most successful (and loved) consoles are the ones we played the best games on. Since PS4 / x86, that entire argument is virtually gone, just get a PC. Pay less on subs and games; free online; better gamepads available; plug and play much the same; bigger non-walled marketplace; modding... full backwards and forward compatibility. I mean... how long does the list have to get.
As long as that doesn't change, every new console release is just a nudge further into the abyss of the shittiest possible gaming imaginable. People are dreaming if they think the monetary clusterfuck won't get expanded further into wallet-draining strategies with every new console release - history repeats after all.^
But maybe the CEO should take a pay cut to cover Xbox corporate losses, then again she's mercilessly swinging the axe without a care since she has no clue how the game industry works.
I do think there is potential in the future for a cloud only handheld device, and that would fit their xbox subscription model, well they would need to change the model. No download tier, a cloud only model. I know it didn't work out for others who tried it, but Xbox has a much bigger library they could put on Cloud.
Not saying I'd buy one, I wouldn't, but I think it has chance of selling well among younger crowd who is living more minimalist lifestyle.
A cloud based only device that plays only the games behind the paywall.
So, first, you pay to have a personal gaming device.
Then, you pay to sub said devices' services.
And then you still own nothing.
And this is minimalist to you? I've got a minimalist firethrower here, if you want to just burn money with zero benefits. And when I'm done, I'll take my mobile phone, that I already have, out of my pocket and fire up a game. Doesn't have to be a powerful device. Just needs to log in to cloud...
I think though if you pitch this idea at Microsoft, Asha will personally thank you and hire you, instantly!