Monday, May 8th 2023

Latest AMD AGESA that Nerfs Ryzen 7000X3D Voltage Control Also Limits Memory Overclocking

The latest AMD AGESA 1.0.0.7 AM5 platform microcode that the company recently released to improve stability of machines powered by Ryzen 7000X3D processors, more importantly, prevent them from physical damage due to increased voltage in voltage-assisted overclocking scenarios; reportedly impacts memory overclocking capabilities, too, reports g01d3nm4ng0. The "PROCHOT Control" and "PROCHOT Deassertation Ramp" toggles that were available in the oldest versions of AGESA for AM5, are not available in the latest production AGESA.

The memory compatibility is also affected. AMD recently added support for odd-density DDR5 memory modules, such as 24 GB and 48 GB, which make up 48 GB and 96 GB 2-module (dual-channel, four sub-channel) kits. It is possible to max out 192 GB, but while the older AGESA 1.0.0.6 allowed memory frequencies of up to DDR5-6000 with SoC voltage of 1.3 V, the newer AGESA is only stable up to DDR5-4400 at this density. To be fair, most motherboards advertise maximum memory frequencies of under DDR5-4800 for memory configurations where there are two DIMMs per channel, and both DIMMs are dual-rank (so four dual-rank DIMMs in all, which is the least optimal memory configuration from a memory frequency and latency perspective).
Source: g01d3nm4ng0 (Twitter)
Add your own comment

73 Comments on Latest AMD AGESA that Nerfs Ryzen 7000X3D Voltage Control Also Limits Memory Overclocking

#1
Daven
AMD’s biggest weakness is the memory controller. It needs improvements across the board (pun intended).
Posted on Reply
#3
Dragam1337
It's not an issue with the normal 2 dimm 32gb config. I have no issues running 6000cl30 with 1.0.0.7
Posted on Reply
#4
Zubasa
Dragam1337It's not an issue with the normal 2 dimm 32gb config. I have no issues running 6000cl30 with 1.0.0.7
My friend updated the bios on his Asrock board and reports 2x32GB works just fine @6000 CL30 as well.
The board defaults to 1.24/1.25V on SOC.
Posted on Reply
#5
GerKNG
" the newer AGESA is only stable up to DDR5-4400 at this density" that's complete BS.
1.3V SOC is enough for 4x16GBGB 6000.
you barely need more than 1.15V for 2x16GB 6000 CL30.
Posted on Reply
#6
Daven
unwind-protectI hate it when I'm right.
You predicted 24 GB and 48 GB memory configs would be clock limited after this update? Wow that’s a pretty specific prediction. Kudos to you! I would have never predicted that this specific memory configuration would be only effected.
Posted on Reply
#7
Gungar
GerKNG" the newer AGESA is only stable up to DDR5-4400 at this density" that's complete BS.
1.3V SOC is enough for 4x16GBGB 6000.
you barely need more than 1.15V for 2x16GB 6000 CL30.
Don't forget that it needs to work on 100% of the setups, not only your use case.
Posted on Reply
#8
Dragam1337
GerKNG" the newer AGESA is only stable up to DDR5-4400 at this density" that's complete BS.
1.3V SOC is enough for 4x16GBGB 6000.
you barely need more than 1.15V for 2x16GB 6000 CL30.
Did you even read the article and entire sentense of what you quoted ? "At this density" which is 192gb...
Posted on Reply
#9
Chaitanya
DavenAMD’s biggest weakness is the memory controller. It needs improvements across the board (pun intended).
Just like Ryzen 1000, weak memory controller fixed by Ryzen 3000(to a lesser degree even 2000). Unfortunately we have to wait for new CPUs.
Posted on Reply
#10
sephiroth117
If previous OC capacity introduced a hardware risk than it's natural for 1.0.0.7 to nerf it.

Personally speaking, I wanted a 7800X3D but its European price really threw a blanket on this. For a gaming rig, it's very useless to run a hard RAM OC, it changes really nothing, there's close to no difference between 6000Mhz/CL32 and faster RAM in most benchmarks
Posted on Reply
#11
rv8000
sephiroth117If previous OC capacity introduced a hardware risk than it's natural for 1.0.0.7 to nerf it.

Personally speaking, I wanted a 7800X3D but its European price really threw a blanket on this. For a gaming rig, it's very useless to run a hard RAM OC, it changes really nothing, there's close to no difference between 6000Mhz/CL32 and faster RAM in most benchmarks
Manually tuning a kit is upwards of 5% free performance, even when you can only go as far as tightening timings or getting 6200 with solid timings on AM5.

Most review sites don’t have the time to actually “overclock” memory, and never provide more information than scaling at xmp/expo settings.
Posted on Reply
#12
ir_cow
Well this will make future memory reviews interesting...
Posted on Reply
#13
somebodys_kid
My 2x16 GB GSkill EXPO profile became unstable after my BIOS update (DDR5 6000 CL 30 at 1.35V). Which memory are you all using that keeps the speed and latency but is stable?
Posted on Reply
#14
sethmatrix7
GungarDon't forget that it needs to work on 100% of the setups, not only your use case.
It's overclocking... so it doesn't need to work on 100% of the setups.
Posted on Reply
#15
Slizzo
@btarunr , Not all of the BIOS released were on AGESA 1.0.0.7. MSI's BIOS that was released for the SoC voltage issue is still on 1.0.0.6.
Posted on Reply
#16
R-T-B
Slizzo@btarunr , Not all of the BIOS released were on AGESA 1.0.0.7. MSI's BIOS that was released for the SoC voltage issue is still on 1.0.0.6.
So are gigabytes as of now.
Posted on Reply
#17
Landcross
somebodys_kidMy 2x16 GB GSkill EXPO profile became unstable after my BIOS update (DDR5 6000 CL 30 at 1.35V). Which memory are you all using that keeps the speed and latency but is stable?
Which motherboard and memory modules do you have? I'm currently using an Asrock board + 2x16 GB G.Skill expo memory as well, but I haven't updated the bios yet and not sure if I should already now
Posted on Reply
#18
GerKNG
GungarDon't forget that it needs to work on 100% of the setups, not only your use case.
that's a good average. let it be + - 20mv and you still have a headroom of around 100mv.
Posted on Reply
#19
somebodys_kid
LandcrossWhich motherboard and memory modules do you have? I'm currently using an Asrock board + 2x16 GB G.Skill expo memory as well, but I haven't updated the bios yet and not sure if I should already now
I have a ROG STRIX X670E-F (my god what terrible naming) BIOS 1401, with G.SKILL Flare X5 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5 6000 (PC5 48000) Model F5-6000J3038F16GX2-FX5
Posted on Reply
#20
Psychoholic
Also using Flare X5 6000, rock solid stable, and im on the beta bios 1.0.0.7 agesa.
Posted on Reply
#21
somebodys_kid
PsychoholicAlso using Flare X5 6000, rock solid stable, and im on the beta bios 1.0.0.7 agesa.
Which motherboard?
Posted on Reply
#22
Psychoholic
somebodys_kidWhich motherboard?
Strix X670E-E
Posted on Reply
#23
somebodys_kid
PsychoholicStrix X670E-E
Jealous of you. RE4 Remake won't last more than 20 minutes with EXPO engaged... Turn it off and it's perfectly fine.
Posted on Reply
#24
rv8000
somebodys_kidI have a ROG STRIX X670E-F (my god what terrible naming) BIOS 1401, with G.SKILL Flare X5 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5 6000 (PC5 48000) Model F5-6000J3038F16GX2-FX5
Do you mean 1410? 1401 is still 1.0.0.6 afaik. Sounds like your memory overclock itself is unstable if you’re tuning timings. It may not be the case with all CPUs but 1.2-1.25 VSOC should typically be enough for 6000-6200.

ASUS’s X670 boards do seem to be a mess though.
Posted on Reply
#25
somebodys_kid
rv8000Do you mean 1410? 1401 is still 1.0.0.6 afaik. Sounds like your memory overclock itself is unstable if you’re tuning timings. It may not be the case with all CPUs but 1.2-1.25 VSOC should typically be enough for 6000-6200.

ASUS’s X670 boards do seem to be a mess though.
Oh good call. I'll try the 1410 later today. 1401 just capped the voltage without the AGESA update.
The spec listed by GSKILL wants 1.35 volts for the EXPO settings.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 28th, 2024 10:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts