Monday, August 18th 2025

New Intel "Lunar Lake" Core Ultra 7 254V SKU Appears

Intel's unannounced Core Ultra 7 254V has begun appearing in benchmark databases, and the figures suggest this may be a deliberately trimmed member of the "Lunar Lake" family, aimed at more affordable laptops. PassMark lists a multicore score of 17,327 and a single-core score of 4,089, which places the 254V noticeably behind the 256V and 258V in multithreaded work, while maintaining single-thread performance in line with other Core Ultra 7 chips. The listing also shows 12 MB of L3 cache and confirms an eight-core layout, matching Lunar Lake's standard design. Separate Furmark traces point to integrated Arc 140V graphics running at approximately 2.0 GHz, a GPU clock similar to that of higher-tier 7-series SKUs, which suggests that Intel may be binning an existing 256V to create a lower-cost option rather than designing something entirely new.

What remains unclear is the memory configuration, as Lunar Lake utilizes LPDDR5X packaged inside the SoC, and suffixes have so far indicated RAM capacity, with 2x8V mapping to 32 GB and 2x6V mapping to 16 GB. A 2x4V suffix would imply an even smaller memory option, but no confirmed devices are shipping with the 254V yet, and we don't know if a version with less than 16 GB memory has ever been planned/shipped. If Intel does release it, the chip could widen Lunar Lake's reach by offering efficient battery life and acceptable day-to-day performance at a lower price, making it an attractive choice for potential budget-focused buyers.
Sources: PassMark, via X86 is dead&back
Add your own comment

7 Comments on New Intel "Lunar Lake" Core Ultra 7 254V SKU Appears

#1
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
8 GB of LPDDR5X maybe? That would suck hard though, even for an office PC.
Posted on Reply
#2
melkor_unlimited
Cheeseball8 GB of LPDDR5X maybe? That would suck hard though, even for an office PC.
8 GB is not an option.
Microsoft declared 16 GB as minimum for AI.
Posted on Reply
#3
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Cheeseball8 GB of LPDDR5X maybe? That would suck hard though, even for an office PC.
Maybe slower memory.
Posted on Reply
#4
kondamin
I don't see why anyone would go for such an expensive chip and only pair it with 8GB of memory
Posted on Reply
#5
Squared
dgianstefaniMaybe slower memory.
Lunar Lake is expensive becauase of the onboard memory, either two 8GB chips or two 16GB chips. One 16GB chip would reduce packaging costs without reducing performance in most tasks except games.
Posted on Reply
#6
kondamin
SquaredLunar Lake is expensive becauase of the onboard memory, either two 8GB chips or two 16GB chips. One 16GB chip would reduce packaging costs without reducing performance in most tasks except games.
Lunar lake has 2 memory channels just like any other consumer platform intel has in production.
the second memory channel increases memory bandwidth which has a serious impact on a lot of workloads and not just gaming.
Posted on Reply
#7
Nostras
Considering the lower multi-core performance but similar single-core performance I'd expect a lower binned chip (worse Vf curve) and/or a lower TDP ootb and/or lower turbo clocks.
Posted on Reply
Nov 14th, 2026 18:59 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts