Wednesday, September 3rd 2025

LG Display's 4th-Generation OLED Panel Obtains Industry's First Perfect Reproduction Verification

LG Display, the world's leading innovator of display technologies, announced today that its fourth-generation OLED panels have been verified by UL Solutions, a global leader in applied safety science, for Perfect Reproduction technology under lighting conditions of up to 500 lux, which is the brightness of a living room in broad daylight. This verification is for displays that most perfectly reproduce original content, including color and brightness, even in bright environments. It recognizes that LG Display's fourth-generation OLED panels accurately reproduce over 95% of original images, based on 4K video (approximately 8.3 million pixels).

To put it another way, these panels perfectly reproduce content at a level of visual quality typically found only in darkened movie theaters, even when they are placed in the brightest living room.
By earning Perfect Reproduction verification, in addition to UL Solutions' Perfect Black and Perfect Color verifications following its 500 lux test late last year, LG Display's fourth-generation OLED panels have been proven to most perfectly reproduce original content in everyday environments.

LG Display has become the first in the industry to achieve all three verifications under lighting conditions of 500 lux, delivering the differentiated customer value of OLED panels that provide consistent and accurate picture quality anytime, anywhere. Beyond simply evaluating color reproduction or brightness, reliable picture quality assessments demonstrate the outstanding picture quality of fourth-generation OLED more objectively, under conditions resembling real-world usage.

OLED panels use a self-emissive structure where each pixel emits light. This allows for precise control of brightness and color at the pixel level, enabling the reproduction of stable, high-quality images even when the brightness of the surrounding environment changes.

LG Display's fourth-generation OLED panels, which incorporate the company's most advanced technology, feature an ultra-low reflection design that blocks glare or internal and external light reflections so that the screen can display exactly what the creator intended.

The company's latest OLED panels deliver the highest quality images in both High Dynamic Range (HDR), delivering movie-level picture quality, and Standard Dynamic Range (SDR), which offers standard TV series-level picture quality.

Unlike the excellent color and contrast ratio of HDR, SDR has a relatively narrow brightness and color range. Therefore, SDR video content can suffer from a more prominent haze effect when viewed on an LCD panel, making images look foggy. On the other hand, OLED panels are able to express perfect black, providing vivid picture quality by maximizing the contrast ratio of HDR and SDR video content.
"Moving forward, we will continue to introduce premium displays that deliver the ultimate viewing experience across diverse usage environments, based on our proprietary OLED technology," said Yoon Soo-young, Chief Technology Officer of LG Display.
Source: LG Display
Add your own comment

26 Comments on LG Display's 4th-Generation OLED Panel Obtains Industry's First Perfect Reproduction Verification

#1
cucol
ok, great, what about if you do a 32" or 42" 4k 16:9 dp 2.1 240hz glossy monitor with this 4th gen oled panel?

thank you.
Posted on Reply
#2
ncrs
Neat, does it have RGB-arranged pixels so text rendering isn't compromised? Those panels were on LG's alleged schedule for Q4 2025.
Posted on Reply
#3
wNotyarD
Will the tech trickle down to sub-50" sizes?
Posted on Reply
#4
azrael
That "4th generation" panel is probably better known as RGB Tandem OLED. And no, no RGB layout for the pixels just yet.
Posted on Reply
#5
Legacy-ZA
azraelThat "4th generation" panel is probably better known as RGB Tandem OLED. And no, no RGB layout for the pixels just yet.
Not yet, but from the 27" models, reviewers have only good things to say, I am looking to snag a 39" beauty. 21:9
Posted on Reply
#6
Six_Times
I love my G3 77" with it's recessed included wall mount bracket. So flush to the wall looks amazing. I just wish it was 240Hz or higher. My 20+ year old Pioneer Plasma still blows away every brand, ZERO artifacts with its 600Hz native speed.

I am saving now for a larger LG G series, I'll buy when OLED panel speed is increased to 240Hz or higher.
Posted on Reply
#7
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Legacy-ZANot yet, but from the 27" models, reviewers have only good things to say, I am looking to snag a 39" beauty. 21:9
5K UW @240 Hz or higher with RGB subpixel layout and I'll trade my 34" 3rd gen WOLED 3440x1440 in or give it to the wife. Doing a GPU upgrade soon so that's good motivation.

Can't decide if wait for Supers or just go with xx80/90.
Six_TimesI am saving now for a larger LG G series, I'll buy when OLED panel speed is increased to 240Hz or higher.
Already there on monitors, you certain you want to wait for TV?
Posted on Reply
#8
wNotyarD
dgianstefaniAlready there on monitors, you certain you want to wait for TV?
As he has a 77" G3 and wants an even larger screen... Yeah, I don't think monitors will fit the requirement :laugh:

I, on the other hand, would be interested in a future replacement for my living room 48" C1 when it gives up the ghost. I'm currently limited to ~50" due to the furniture, hence the 42-to-48" sweet spot.
Posted on Reply
#9
wolf
Better Than Native
Love my 42 C2 that's been flawless as a pc monitor for work and play for 3 years now, maybe when it turns 5 I'll seriously look at what's available then to replace it.

Would be neat to see plasma-esque pwm/sub field that runs at significantly higher hz, or expanded BFI options, something extra to improve on sample and hold tech.

Not that I have significant gripes even at 120hz tbh.
Posted on Reply
#10
overclockedamd
wolfLove my 42 C2 that's been flawless as a pc monitor for work and play for 3 years now, maybe when it turns 5 I'll seriously look at what's available then to replace it.
My LG CX just turned 5 this year and it still performs so well that I cannot justify dropping 2-3k USD on a new panel when it still just looks so good and has zero burn in.
Posted on Reply
#11
Legacy-ZA
dgianstefani5K UW @240 Hz or higher with RGB subpixel layout and I'll trade my 34" 3rd gen WOLED 3440x1440 in or give it to the wife. Doing a GPU upgrade soon so that's good motivation.

Can't decide if wait for Supers or just go with xx80/90.


Already there on monitors, you certain you want to wait for TV?
Go with the super variants, there are 4k scenarios where there the 16GB VRAM is saturated. Not sure what the 39" will run on the LG, but I will probably use balanced or performance, I am sure I won't notice.
Posted on Reply
#12
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Legacy-ZAGo with the super variants, there are 4k scenarios where there the 16GB VRAM is saturated. Not sure what the 39" will run on the LG, but I will probably use balanced or performance, I am sure I won't notice.
There won't be a Super xx90, still undecided if I genuinely need a RTX 5090 for 3440x1440 @ 240 Hz. Would be nice, but it's also twice the price. Probably worth it over the course of four years, besides the resale value.
Posted on Reply
#13
Seeprime
Why is perfect defined as 95% accuracy? Sounds like market BS, even though LG screens are great.
Posted on Reply
#14
Legacy-ZA
SeeprimeWhy is perfect defined as 95% accuracy? Sounds like market BS, even though LG screens are great.
It's WOLED, they never gave the amount of colours QD-OLED did, but they are very close now, only brighter, longer life, couple that with true-glossy-black. It's finally time I consider buying an OLED. Always have to wait 3 generations for them to iron out the kinks, I will leave the "consumer" part to people having to prove a point to one up their neighbour, lol.
Posted on Reply
#15
Erratic4^2
cucolok, great, what about if you do a 32" or 42" 4k 16:9 dp 2.1 240hz glossy monitor with this 4th gen oled panel?

thank you.
Hear me out, a 27" 16:10. I love the extra vertical space and I run dual monitors, so width isn't an issue for me.
Posted on Reply
#16
Bill_Bright
When they come out with 24" versions, I'll take two! :) I won't hold my breath, however. :(
Posted on Reply
#17
Simon.J
Erratic4^2Hear me out, a 27" 16:10. I love the extra vertical space and I run dual monitors, so width isn't an issue for me.
Well said, but dp 2.2 it’s a must have feature.
Posted on Reply
#18
Dahita
I'm a bit confused by the lack of info regarding the color space % achieved here. BT2020 coverage extent? DCI-P3? RGB Minileds are supposed to cover much more of those two standards, yet their LG picture on a regular WOLED "accurately reproduce over 95% of original images". What measure sanctions the 95% accuracy?

Sounds like a confusing press release bs to me.
Posted on Reply
#19
THU31
ncrsNeat, does it have RGB-arranged pixels so text rendering isn't compromised? Those panels were on LG's alleged schedule for Q4 2025.
I've never really understood the issue. I've seen zoomed in pictures of it, and I don't see it on my screen, even when I put my face right in front of the TV, all text looks great. And I've been using my LG C8 OLED with 4:2:0 chroma subsampling as a monitor for 6 years.
Posted on Reply
#20
Bill_Bright
DahitaSounds like a confusing press release bs to me.
Perhaps but if you follow the links back to the original article, you will note this perfect score came from the independent testing labs, UL.. So that part is not marketing hype, and IMO, is the part that maters to me - or one main part anyway.
Posted on Reply
#21
tommo1982
Do these OLED panels suffer the same smearing when browsing pictures with white background and black text, as do AMOLED screens do in smartphones?
Posted on Reply
#22
phints
Would love a 65” tv (yes I know it’s the G5) and a 27” 1440p 240Hz monitor with this tech, but by the time I am willing to spend the money we’ll be on sixth gen and have new more efficient PhOLED layers I’m sure.
Posted on Reply
#23
Godrilla
overclockedamdMy LG CX just turned 5 this year and it still performs so well that I cannot justify dropping 2-3k USD on a new panel when it still just looks so good and has zero burn in.
Same here.
Posted on Reply
#24
Wye
"Perfect Reproduction technology"
Sounds like another PR stunt.
I wish we could provide these kind of comments on the site itself, or on the search engines, instead of using 100 of sites.
Posted on Reply
#25
Bill_Bright
Wye"Perfect Reproduction technology"
:(

As someone who constantly criticizes the antics and misinformation campaigns by marketing weenies, I would normally agree.

But not in this case. As noted in post #21 above, I note again it is not the manufacturer making the claim but a well respected, independent and "non-profit" testing laboratory. That means LG did not pay UL to give it a good review.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 21:55 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts