Monday, November 17th 2025
Valve Claims Steam Machine Outperforms 70% of Current Gaming PCs
When Valve introduced its Steam Machine cube gaming console/PC, the gaming community began questioning the hardware choices and Valve's performance claims. However, a Valve engineer stated that the Steam Machine is more powerful than 70% of gaming PCs on the market, based on Steam Survey data. It features a semi-custom six-core AMD "Zen 4" processor with 28 compute units of RDNA 3 graphics. Valve promotes the PC as capable of achieving 4K gaming at 60 FPS with ray tracing and FSR support. It includes 16 GB of DDR5 system memory and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, powering a semi-custom GPU that may be closer to AMD's RDNA 3.5 than pure RDNA 3.
During Adam Savage's Tested podcast, Valve engineer Yazan Aldehayyat remarked that the machine can run all available games on the market. Valve selected this configuration considering the price (which remains unknown), entry-level segment, and market position based on Steam Survey data. Being equal to or better than 70% of existing hardware makes it suitable for most users, and we expect the price point to be attractive to justify its value. Until the pricing is published, we don't know where the Steam Machine will land in terms of market segmentation. However, if Valve plans mass adoption, it will have to be a competitive price point even if it keeps profit margins lower.
Source:
via Notebook Check
During Adam Savage's Tested podcast, Valve engineer Yazan Aldehayyat remarked that the machine can run all available games on the market. Valve selected this configuration considering the price (which remains unknown), entry-level segment, and market position based on Steam Survey data. Being equal to or better than 70% of existing hardware makes it suitable for most users, and we expect the price point to be attractive to justify its value. Until the pricing is published, we don't know where the Steam Machine will land in terms of market segmentation. However, if Valve plans mass adoption, it will have to be a competitive price point even if it keeps profit margins lower.

133 Comments on Valve Claims Steam Machine Outperforms 70% of Current Gaming PCs
Obviously, the Steam Machine was not made for us PC over achievers to replace our main desktop. This will bring so many more people into pc gaming and hopefully drive them here to learn how to build their own. lol I'm ready to start seeing benchmarks for a 9800X3D paired with a RX 9070 XT running SteamOS.
BUT the price must be under 700$, any more $ will be too much for a custom, not upgradable device.SteamOS benchmarks are probably near those of garuda or other linux gaming distros, very near windows performance some games a little bit more, other less.
Honestly if I didn't wants the xbox game pass I could probably switch even my main pc on garuda.
Because basically only the wealthiest/those with highest income have had their income rise faster than cost of about everything has been rising.
Which is different than what is selling, right?
I think a cut down 7600 is not in the top 70% of gaming PCs selling today...
At $700 price tier in particular, you can get a better spec'd mini-pc. At $750 you are talking 8 core 32GB mini PC + eGPU.
Certainly steam is a more reliable brand than the Chinese Mini PC brands which is why $700 is viable for them but if they are wise they sell under $700. Their insistence that it isn't a console though indicates to me that $700 might be the floor, although I hope I'm wrong.
$500 would make it another steam deck moment, a legitimate competitor to the other consoles.
As loud as the anti-Windows sentiment is on my feeds, I don't think that represents the vast majority of people who play games on their PC.
You can see the OS breakdown right on the home page. If you filter the data by Linux only, you can see that the Steam Deck GPUs make up ~30% of the "Linux" users.
From my days of Pc gaming, it was mostly about 'Look" over console gaming and with how expensive pc has gotten the need to want to "look" superior has shrunk.. that isn't to say there isn't a market for it, but it is much much smaller now.
Maybe its a testament to how good graphics now look on lower setting that persons don't see the need to go pass 1080p setting. Also i think most aren't willing to sacrifice great FPS just to look that better
Finally, I was supporting your point of non-Windows users being practically irrelevant to game developers, not sure why you're nitpicking.