Monday, November 17th 2025

Valve Claims Steam Machine Outperforms 70% of Current Gaming PCs

When Valve introduced its Steam Machine cube gaming console/PC, the gaming community began questioning the hardware choices and Valve's performance claims. However, a Valve engineer stated that the Steam Machine is more powerful than 70% of gaming PCs on the market, based on Steam Survey data. It features a semi-custom six-core AMD "Zen 4" processor with 28 compute units of RDNA 3 graphics. Valve promotes the PC as capable of achieving 4K gaming at 60 FPS with ray tracing and FSR support. It includes 16 GB of DDR5 system memory and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, powering a semi-custom GPU that may be closer to AMD's RDNA 3.5 than pure RDNA 3.

During Adam Savage's Tested podcast, Valve engineer Yazan Aldehayyat remarked that the machine can run all available games on the market. Valve selected this configuration considering the price (which remains unknown), entry-level segment, and market position based on Steam Survey data. Being equal to or better than 70% of existing hardware makes it suitable for most users, and we expect the price point to be attractive to justify its value. Until the pricing is published, we don't know where the Steam Machine will land in terms of market segmentation. However, if Valve plans mass adoption, it will have to be a competitive price point even if it keeps profit margins lower.
Source: via Notebook Check
Add your own comment

133 Comments on Valve Claims Steam Machine Outperforms 70% of Current Gaming PCs

#126
chrcoluk
Probably correct to be fair, most gamers arent hardware enthusiasts.
Posted on Reply
#127
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
R0H1TSo but an M5 iPad pro, problem solved :laugh:
M5 Ipad pro can't play steam games...

You know what is actually crazy? The Steam deck surpassed all performance expectations and people here still doubting on Gabe.
Posted on Reply
#128
TheGeekn°72
Easy RhinoM5 Ipad pro can't play steam games...
at that point, he's just trolling you man, you're just losing your time and wasting effort explaining things
chrcolukProbably correct to be fair, most gamers arent hardware enthusiasts.
which is a shame, people in general should be more aware of the various models of "thinking sand" they can buy to get the best one for their use and budget
Posted on Reply
#129
kramstrebor
PunkenjoyWell, the thing with the Steam Machine is if you prefer to run a Framework Desktop with the AI Max in IT with Steam OS, you can ! its an open ecosystem. Steam Machine isnt for you then. That is what is great with it. You can buy it if you want. You can use whatever else if you dont !!


This is false, the Max 385 is 1100$ US and without storage, fans and power cable. The Max is 1599$+ and you still need to add storage, fan and power cable.

also they compare it to a 4070 LAPTOP. This is a big diference as it perform around a 3060. Its less performance than a 7600. The 7600M is around 15% slower but the Steam machine will have a higher power budget. In the end. It might be pretty similar.

The main difference will be in the memory management. With Shared memory, there is no risk of going over the frame buffer. In the end it will be on how SteamOS manage memory for the steam machine. I heard good things and the OS overhead in VRAM is probably smaller than Windows, but we will see. Like i said, the PCI-E setup might also influence greatly the performance we see in memory limited scenario.
Nope.

My GPD Win 5 handheld just shipped.

$1,400 for a Max+ 395, 32GB of RAM, 2TB SSD and it includes a battery, power supply, screen and controllers.

That was on the IndieGogo sale, though. It will be interesting to see where it lands on the retail price.
Posted on Reply
#130
kramstrebor
LastDudeALiveYour claim was that the Steam Survey is unreliable because "Its not a representation of the PC gaming market, or gaming in general. It is what is says it is: a survey among steam users."

Now you're conceding that even if people have other launchers for a game or two, they still have Steam, thank you for conceding that.

Again, the share of people who game on PC but do not have Steam installed is likely no more than 2-3% at most. The Steam Survey is a reliable source of information about the hardware PC gamers have, and Valve obviously trusts it enough to allocate hundreds of millions of $ based on the data.
I don't think so.

Using World of Warcraft as an example. That one, single solitary game has active player estimates that exceed Counter Strike - at their very lowest. At top estimates, the daily player base of WoW is likely 2 million per day. So, double that of Steam's highest-by-far played game.

Most of the players that I know, who play WoW, only play that one game. Maybe they play a bit of Hearthstone on the side. They don't play Steam games. My main gaming PC has Cyberpunk and Skyrim installed. I only have GoG Galaxy installed.

The world's most played game is still - I believe - League of Legends. Most of the players that I know who play that game only play League. Ditto Fortnight.

Same deal on Microsoft Flight Simulator. Everyone I know who plays that game ONLY plays that one game.

I suppose the biggest problem with your "97% of PC gamers run Steam" implication is that concurrent online players on the Steam platform hovers around 40 million. Since Nvidia - alone - ship 10 million dGPUs per quarter, I would say that you are massively underestimating the size of the gaming market.
Posted on Reply
#131
Punkenjoy
kramstreborNope.

My GPD Win 5 handheld just shipped.

$1,400 for a Max+ 395, 32GB of RAM, 2TB SSD and it includes a battery, power supply, screen and controllers.

That was on the IndieGogo sale, though. It will be interesting to see where it lands on the retail price.
Good for you and congrats on this nice machine !

I was answering someone claiming that you could get the AI Max+ 395 for 1000$ witch is not the case.
Posted on Reply
#132
irisChronomia
OnasiMost people just don’t really care about PC specs as long as whatever they want to play runs okay. Since the “whatever” in a lot of cases is something like League of Legends or WoW or modded Skyrim or whatever it just doesn’t take much.
Nintendo Switch users agree passionately. (I'm not saying Steam Machine is Switch, just joking about NS).
N/AGet the power under 100 Watts ZEN6 RDNA6 N3
And who's gonna pay for it?
that outperforms a 5070 and we have a deal.
5070 already does 85-110W on mobile with N5 and you're expecting magic?
N/AWith the built-in CPU, NVMe, and external power, it shouldn't be any bigger than the RX 7600, 12 x 30 x 4 cm, 1.5 liters, 900 grams. I have no idea what they do with the remaining 2.25 liters, it's more of a design choice.
Mac Mini and its outstanding repairability and modularity says hi.
TheGeekn°72which is a shame, people in general should be more aware of the various models of "thinking sand" they can buy to get the best one for their use and budget
I can literally hear me yelling at every single Nintendo Switch buyers, regardless of the generation.
Posted on Reply
#133
waltc
I am not impressed with Newell's "hardware"...never have been...;) 70% of developed games were written to run fine on the 70% of hardware Valve thinks is too slow...;) I'm so happy I left the marketing wars long ago!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 16:48 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts