Sunday, November 30th 2025

AMD Lists Ryzen 7 9850X3D CPU with 5.6 GHz Boost Frequency

AMD has launched an official website placeholder for the Ryzen 7 9850X3D processor, which was leaked in October. As a part of the "Granite Ridge" Ryzen 9000 X3D series, AMD is reportedly developing two additional updates to the lineup. One is a flagship model, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2, and the other is a refined eight-core, 16-thread X3D design. Today, AMD's website confirms the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads, 96 MB of L3 cache, and a boost clock up to 5.6 GHz, with a 120 W power envelope. This represents a 400 MHz increase over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D model, which has the same cache and core configuration. AMD is likely using higher-binned dies it has saved over the past few months to offer a better alternative to Intel's upcoming "Arrow Lake Refresh," scheduled for early 2026, and "Nova Lake," scheduled for late 2026.

However, details about the new flagship model, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads, remain uncertain. This chip reportedly includes 3D V-Cache on both chiplets, totaling approximately 192 MB of L3 cache. It is said to operate at a base frequency of 4.30 GHz, with a boost up to around 5.6 GHz, and has a TDP of about 200 W. The 9950X3D2, with its new naming convention, suggests a tradeoff of slightly lower peak boost speeds (-100 MHz) compared to the single-stack X3D Ryzen 9 9950X3D model, but offers significantly increased cache capacity. Today only the higher-clocked Ryzen 7 9850X3D is confirmed by AMD, so we might have to wait on the dual-chiplet X3D2 SKU a bit more.
Sources: AMD, via VIdeoCardz
Add your own comment

148 Comments on AMD Lists Ryzen 7 9850X3D CPU with 5.6 GHz Boost Frequency

#26
damric
Excited about the new CPU SKUs, but...

4 DIMM slot boards suck ass on AM5, whether you are using 2 DIMMS or 4.

Looking for non-scalped RAM? Check your local STAPLES. 32GB kits around $110. In store only.

That is all.
Posted on Reply
#27
Jtuck9
dgianstefaniMost esports players will also tell you that a stable FPS is conducive to better aiming performance. I.e. if your 1% lows are close to your framerate/monitor refresh cap, you can test that and see better performance than with fluctuating FPS, even if the average is higher.
Yea, wasn't there something recently about how e-sports players preferred prebuilds with x3d chips?! (turning their noses up at Intel builds) Not sure how that will change in the near future, especially with Chinese gamers running domestic rigs for example...
Posted on Reply
#28
Hecate91
A 9700X3D as a lower clocked version of the 9800X3D would've been more interesting, then again a few watts more is maybe worth the extra performance, and any GPU is going to be drawing much more power on average than the CPU.
Posted on Reply
#29
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Jtuck9Yea, wasn't there something recently about how e-sports players preferred prebuilds with x3d chips?! Not sure how that will change in the near future, especially with Chinese gamers running domestic rigs for example...
Basically X3D, or Raptor Lake with very nicely tuned memory, both offer great frametime consistency, and depending on the game, some games prefer ~100 MB of cache, others prefer the much faster memory subsystem and the lower latency/higher frequency cores (plus more of them without inter die latency) of the monolithic Intel, plus those are generally better for streaming setups due to the much higher memory bandwidth and iGPU that is excellent for encoding. Unfortunately the Arrow Lake and Zen 2-5 CPUs don't seem to scale FPS as nicely with frequency of either core or memory, since the chiplet latency/infinity fabric is in the way. Thankfully the X3D cache makes up for that.

It can be easier to setup an X3D system since cooling and RAM isn't as influential, which is a big perk for e-sports players who just want to buy it and game.

But then again the Raptor Lake setups tend to be cheaper, which is a perk for e-sports players who aren't pros.
Posted on Reply
#30
Jtuck9
dgianstefaniBasically X3D, or Raptor Lake with very nicely tuned memory, both offer great frametime consistency, and depending on the game, some games prefer ~100 MB of cache, others prefer the much faster memory subsystem and the lower latency/higher frequency cores (plus more of them without inter die latency) of the monolithic Intel, plus those are generally better for streaming setups due to the much higher memory bandwidth and iGPU that is excellent for encoding. Unfortunately the Arrow Lake and Zen 2-5 CPUs don't seem to scale FPS as nicely with frequency of either core or memory, since the chiplet latency/infinity fabric is in the way. Thankfully the X3D cache makes up for that.

It can be easier to setup an X3D system since cooling and RAM isn't as influential, which is a big perk for e-sports players who just want to buy it and game.

But then again the Raptor Lake setups tend to be cheaper, which is a perk for e-sports players who aren't pros.
I mustn't have read the fine print on those "1000 FPS Club" slides

www.techpowerup.com/341018/amd-promotes-ryzen-9000-x3d-cpus-as-1000-fps-esports-machines

www.pcgamer.com/hardware/processors/the-game-is-ass-on-anything-else-but-a-9800x3d-esports-players-are-complaining-about-using-intel-cpus-at-sponsored-tournaments-rather-than-amd-x3d-chips-with-multiple-claims-of-crashing-and-significantly-worse-performance/

This came to mind for some reason:

(See, plays like shit...)
Posted on Reply
#31
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Jtuck9I mustn't have read the fine print on those "1000 FPS Club" slides

www.techpowerup.com/341018/amd-promotes-ryzen-9000-x3d-cpus-as-1000-fps-esports-machines

www.pcgamer.com/hardware/processors/the-game-is-ass-on-anything-else-but-a-9800x3d-esports-players-are-complaining-about-using-intel-cpus-at-sponsored-tournaments-rather-than-amd-x3d-chips-with-multiple-claims-of-crashing-and-significantly-worse-performance/

This came to mind for some reason:

(See, plays like shit...)
Yeah, 285K is an odd choice for an e-sports tournament, for sure.
Posted on Reply
#32
AusWolf
Jtuck9I mustn't have read the fine print on those "1000 FPS Club" slides

www.techpowerup.com/341018/amd-promotes-ryzen-9000-x3d-cpus-as-1000-fps-esports-machines

www.pcgamer.com/hardware/processors/the-game-is-ass-on-anything-else-but-a-9800x3d-esports-players-are-complaining-about-using-intel-cpus-at-sponsored-tournaments-rather-than-amd-x3d-chips-with-multiple-claims-of-crashing-and-significantly-worse-performance/

This came to mind for some reason:

(See, plays like shit...)
Is that supposed to be an "it's not about size MHz, but how you use it" argument? :D
Posted on Reply
#33
Jtuck9
AusWolfIs that supposed to be an "it's not about size MHz, but how you use it" argument? :D
Haha, some form of resentment I'm sure. I don't think I aged gracefully out of games like CS

I'll sneak in a couple more:


Posted on Reply
#34
halcyon
What's the point? A marginal 0.5 - 3% improvement in synth benchmarks? Higher price and more profit for the stock owners? Testing new chip packaging features in a halo product, so that they can then launch them in a wider selection of products later on?

I think those who have not upgraded already are at this point waiting for upgrades to the I/O and for the RAM prices to drop.
Posted on Reply
#35
Hecate91
Dr. DroHaha. All that's gonna happen is the 9800X3D is gonna get phased out in favor of this. They don't need to release a more accessible variant if they're in the lead, release an "improved" version, let the stock on the old one run out, increase overall ASP for older products.

Shareholders happy, customers fooled, company profitable. But nah, AMD wouldn't, right? Right?
Have a source to confirm this?
What AMD is doing is no different than what Intel does with a refresh or "KS" version of a CPU.
Newer manufacturing runs likely means AMD could get higher clocks, but why am I not surprised by reactions like this.
Posted on Reply
#36
Makaveli
jesdals9800x3d was at a all time low price this weekend so jumped the gun because I expect price hike for the 9850x3d. Now Im going to look for the gen 6 in the fall as a potential upgrade.
Zen 6 in h2 2026 will be vanilla models not x3d versions.
AusWolfAfter the 9800X3D doubled on the max power consumption of the 7800X3D, we get even more power pushed into it? Oh God, why?

A more conservative 9700X3D would have been happier news, imo.
How much do you pay for power in the UK that the power draw difference matters that much to you?

When in game which most people will be using these cpu's for the difference isn't that great.



Posted on Reply
#37
ymdhis
AusWolfI'm not talking about 20 W. I'm talking about the 9800X3D eating twice as much as the 7800X3D does. That's 155 vs 74 W according to the TPU review. All that for a 15% performance gain in applications (translate that to 1.5x the power consumption in gaming for 3% performance gain). And now we have this thing pushing the limits even further. Please allow me to call it wasteful.
They had to do that because Intel is pushing +200W so they can get +15% boost to compete with AMD.

I really wish they could do a system that uses less than 100W at peak and less than 10W in idle, but as long as they are competing for the absolute best performance, they have no choice but to push the power envelope.
Posted on Reply
#38
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
ymdhisI really wish they could do a system that uses less than 100W at peak and less than 10W in idle, but as long as they are competing for the absolute best performance, they have no choice but to push the power envelope.
The new packaging with Zen 6 hopefully fixes the Zen 2-5 idle power draw problem.
Posted on Reply
#39
AusWolf
MakaveliHow much do you pay for power in the UK that the power draw difference matters that much to you?
A lot. But regardless, I'm more worried about heat, as I have a fairly compact system. Also the fact that 9000 series X3D is a huge regression in efficiency.

Not everything is about money.
ymdhisI really wish they could do a system that uses less than 100W at peak
My 7950X3D uses exactly 100 W at peak with a disabled boost (at constant 4.2 GHz). :D
Posted on Reply
#40
Makaveli
AusWolfA lot. But regardless, I'm more worried about heat, as I have a fairly compact system. Also the fact that 9000 series X3D is a huge regression in efficiency.

Not everything is about money.


My 7950X3D uses exactly 100 W at peak with a disabled boost (at constant 4.2 GHz). :D
What is alot?

Can you provide the cost per kWh

Heat out put on a 9800X3D isn't that high. When playing BF6 i'm doing 57-61C and 100 watts on cpu package.

Posted on Reply
#41
AusWolf
MakaveliWhat is alot?

Can you provide the cost per kWh
I can, but that is not my point. It's just shy of £0.30 per kWh. But even if it was free, heat is still a thing.
Posted on Reply
#42
Makaveli
AusWolfI can, but that is not my point. It's just shy of £0.30 per kWh. But even if it was free, heat is still a thing.
I understand but my point is the difference is so small it doesn't really matter.

You are not going to feel a difference in temps in a room with a 7800X3D vs 9800X3D.
Posted on Reply
#43
AusWolf
MakaveliHeat out put on a 9800X3D isn't that high. When playing BF6 i'm doing 60C and 100 watts on cpu package.

With a 360 mm AIO? Awesome. Which part of "I have a fairly compact system" didn't you get?
Posted on Reply
#44
Makaveli
AusWolfWith a 360 mm AIO? Awesome. Which part of "I have a fairly compact system" didn't you get?
This review is using this for a cooler which is similar in size to your Noctua NH-U9S

CPU Cooler - be quiet! DARK ROCK 5
Posted on Reply
#45
freeagent
People still say the 5800X3D is a hard chip to cool, meanwhile I can do it with no fans on the cooler in the middle of summer running Linpack..

I will not be convinced an X3D chip can/will run hot when in my hands with air or AIO :)

It does sip power though..
Posted on Reply
#46
Makaveli
freeagentPeople still say the 5800X3D is a hard chip to cool, meanwhile I can do it with no fans on the cooler in the middle of summer running Linpack..

I will not be convinced an X3D chip can/will run hot when in my hands with air or AIO :)

It does sip power though..
Had a 5800X3D and I agree that was easy to cool. The 5800X I had before it produced more heat.
Posted on Reply
#47
jesdals
MakaveliZen 6 in h2 2026 will be vanilla models not x3d versions.
If theres no x3d versions of Zen 6 in 2026 its just going to make my upgrade a bether choise - but I might jump the upgrade train early if there is :) Especially because I got memory at a good price before all went crazy
Posted on Reply
#48
Makaveli
jesdalsIf theres no x3d versions of Zen 6 in 2026 its just going to make my upgrade a bether choise - but I might jump the upgrade train early if there is :) Especially because I got memory at a good price before all went crazy
If we do see Zen 6 X3D it will be the very end of 2026 or Q1 2027 but I agree with your decision making there.

I'm pushing for RDNA 5 but we won't see that until 2027. So if the 12 cores Zen 6 X3D chips drops before the GPU i'm grabbing it on launch.
Posted on Reply
#49
freeagent
I hope they kill X3D, and just unify the line :)
Posted on Reply
#50
shuffy_losys
A few data points with regards to the 9800X3D, or at least the one I have. The only tweaks I've done to it is set PBO CO to -22 all core and V_SOC to 0.950V.

From a Cinebench 2024 run
  • It boosted to 5.2GHz on all cores
  • VID remained around 1.1V
  • Power consumption via the PPT value was ~100W throughout
  • Temperature averaged around 62C but I was using the motherboard's fan curve which is more aggressive than the one I usually use via Fan Control. Cooler is a Thermalright Phantom Spirit
  • Final score was 1330
  • I also ran it with turbo disabled via the OS. It went down to 4.6GHz, VID around 0.985V to 1.0V, and 70W PPT, with a final score around 1200
In most of the games I play, though I have a global FPS cap of 125FPS, the CPU uses around 40W. The only CPU heavy game I regularly play, FFXIV, can bring it up to 55-60W, but otherwise it'll go down to around 35-40W. If I disable turbo, it usually shaves off 5-10W.

Another thing of note is the turbo behavior on the 9800X3D (and possibly Zen 5) is different than the 7800X3D. The 9800X3D boosts to max clock regardless of core/thread occupation. The 7800X3D only boosts to max clock for a CPU core if it has both threads occupied. (www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-9800x3d/26.html / www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-7800x3d/26.html )

I do have an 7800X3D, but I don't know if it's actually working. I guess I could make that a holiday project to test it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 06:59 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts