Friday, February 13th 2026

HBM4 Validation Expected in 2Q26; Three Major Suppliers Poised to Shape NVIDIA Supply Landscape

TrendForce's latest analysis of the HBM industry reveals that as the ongoing expansion of AI infrastructure continues to fuel GPU demand, NVIDIA's upcoming Rubin platform is expected to become a major catalyst for HBM4 adoption once mass production begins. The three leading memory suppliers—Samsung, SK hynix, and Micron—are now in the final stages of HBM4 validation, with completion anticipated by 2Q26.

Samsung, supported by its strong product stability, is projected to secure certification first. SK hynix and Micron are expected to follow shortly thereafter, forming a three-supplier ecosystem for NVIDIA's HBM4.
TrendForce notes that the rapid expansion of inference AI use cases—particularly among North American CSPs racing to capture early AI agent opportunities—has significantly strengthened demand momentum since late 2025. NVIDIA remains cautiously optimistic about the commercial outlook for its next-generation Rubin platform as CSPs accelerate the deployment of AI servers, reinforcing positive expectations for HBM4 bit demand growth.

On the supply side, however, the broader memory shortage has intensified. Prices for conventional DRAM have surged sharply since 4Q25, narrowing HBM's historical advantage in profitability. Memory vendors are therefore recalibrating capacity allocation between HBM and conventional DRAM to balance overall revenue growth and customer commitments. Under such conditions, NVIDIA's reliance on a single supplier could hinder the ramp-up of the Rubin platform.

For suppliers, sustained growth in GPU demand—coupled with HBM's complex design and validation uncertainties—requires memory makers to continuously advance product roadmaps across generations to avoid missing market opportunities. An optimistic outlook on HBM4 demand, the inability of any single supplier to fully satisfy Rubin requirements, and the strategic need for vendors to maintain multi-generation market share mean TrendForce expects NVIDIA to incorporate all three major suppliers into its HBM4 supply chain.

Samsung currently leads in terms of validation progress and is expected to begin phased mass production following completion in 2Q26. SK hynix continues to advance steadily and is likely to retain a competitive edge in bit allocation, supported by its longstanding HBM partnership with NVIDIA. Micron, while progressing at a relatively slower pace, is also expected to complete validation by 2Q26.
Source: TrendForce
Add your own comment

13 Comments on HBM4 Validation Expected in 2Q26; Three Major Suppliers Poised to Shape NVIDIA Supply Landscape

#1
Space Lynx
Astronaut
i wonder if this means in 2028 when rtx 6000 arrives if it will have HBM vram, since ai markets will prob be saturated by end of 2027
Posted on Reply
#2
Wirko
Space Lynxi wonder if this means in 2028 when rtx 6000 arrives if it will have HBM vram, since ai markets will prob be saturated by end of 2027
No. Not RTX. But a shift from GDDR to LPDDR seems somewhat possible to me because LPDDR can be stacked, therefore they can put Apple-level amount of memory, or more, around the processor. GDDR has never been stacked as far as I know, probably because it's too hot, and also the extremely high data rate would cause additional issues.

HBM is for servers, and whatever you can buy now in the shape of a PCIe card is derived from SXM or OCP modules. It's far more expensive per GB than RTX workstation cards, with a major reason for the high price being the type of memory. That's not going to change. HBM was designed from the ground up to be high density, high price, for those who need that and can pay for that.
Posted on Reply
#3
Space Lynx
Astronaut
WirkoNo. Not RTX. But a shift from GDDR to LPDDR seems somewhat possible to me because LPDDR can be stacked, therefore they can put Apple-level amount of memory, or more, around the processor. GDDR has never been stacked as far as I know, probably because it's too hot, and also the extremely high data rate would cause additional issues.

HBM is for servers, and whatever you can buy now in the shape of a PCIe card is derived from SXM or OCP modules. It's far more expensive per GB than RTX workstation cards, with a major reason for the high price being the type of memory. That's not going to change. HBM was designed from the ground up to be high density, high price, for those who need that and can pay for that.
the radeon vega consumer gpu had HBM memory though, and that wasn't that long ago, i mean it was, but not in tech world that long. its not impossible they will move to HBM again
Posted on Reply
#5
Hecate91
Space Lynxthe radeon vega consumer gpu had HBM memory though, and that wasn't that long ago, i mean it was, but not in tech world that long. its not impossible they will move to HBM again
HBM cost per GB is much more expensive than GDDR memory, though that probably wouldn't stop Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#6
_JP_
Space Lynxi wonder if this means in 2028 when rtx 6000 arrives if it will have HBM vram, since ai markets will prob be saturated by end of 2027
More likely in RTX PRO line, since that is mostly business directed where they would sell the most volume of them. As other have said, other DRAM tech is more likely to show up on the RTX line, and it would also help with product differentiation (translation: charging more for "exclusive tech").
Posted on Reply
#7
Wirko
Space Lynxthe radeon vega consumer gpu had HBM memory though, and that wasn't that long ago, i mean it was, but not in tech world that long. its not impossible they will move to HBM again
That was a prototype, to put it simply. It was a radically new tech, it wasn't immediately clear whether it can be mass manufactured at an acceptable cost, whether it can withstand thermal cycling and aging, whether games can benefit from crazy high memory bandwidth, whether there would be enough interest among HPC customers, and more dilemmas. What better to do than push a few thousand cards into the hands of enthusiasts, at a price they can swallow, and watch as they torture the hardware.

Seven years later, the story repeats with 3D V-Cache, the difference being that the products weren't ultra expensive to make and remained accessible to consumers.
Posted on Reply
#8
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Hecate91HBM cost per GB is much more expensive than GDDR memory, though that probably wouldn't stop Nvidia.
with 3 new factories making HBM and ai demand prob falling off in late 2027, volume HBM might be cheaper actually.

im just guessing the ai will fall off at end of 2027 though... could be wrong, but i think the market for it is already saturated... which is why they are hemorrhaging money
Posted on Reply
#9
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Wirko@TheLostSwede Why don't you post a link to the press release, which is www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20260213-12929.html ? Does Trendforce not allow that?
Because 1. we don't tend to link to press releases and 2. there is nothing on that page that we didn't already post, since we tend to post the full press release, with exception of some of the financial stuff.
The reson for the link back to them, is because it benefits both publications, or at least used to, the SEO game has sort of changed.
Posted on Reply
#10
igormp
TheLostSwedeBecause 1. we don't tend to link to press releases and 2. there is nothing on that page that we didn't already post, since we tend to post the full press release, with exception of some of the financial stuff.
The reson for the link back to them, is because it benefits both publications, or at least used to, the SEO game has sort of changed.
Quick meta question: why does the "Source" hyperlink in the news forum posts always lead to the same URL as the "View at TechPowerUp Main Site" hyperlink? I personally find it a bit annoying to have to open the TPU main site and then click on the actual source.
If it's on purpose, could the "source" hyperlink me removed? Leaving only the link to the main page instead.
Posted on Reply
#11
TheLostSwede
News Editor
igormpQuick meta question: why does the "Source" hyperlink in the news forum posts always lead to the same URL as the "View at TechPowerUp Main Site" hyperlink? I personally find it a bit annoying to have to open the TPU main site and then click on the actual source.
If it's on purpose, could the "source" hyperlink me removed? Leaving only the link to the main page instead.
That you'll have to take up with the management, the question has been asked many times, but I believe it has something to do with how the forums work and double up as the comment system on the main site. As for why there are two things, I again, don't know.
Posted on Reply
#12
igormp
TheLostSwedeThat you'll have to take up with the management
And here I thought you were part of the management :laugh:
But fair enough, thanks for the reply nonetheless.
Posted on Reply
#13
TheLostSwede
News Editor
igormpAnd here I thought you were part of the management :laugh:
But fair enough, thanks for the reply nonetheless.
Afraid not. I just produce some content.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 06:27 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts