Friday, February 20th 2026

Intel's "Bartlett Lake-S" Core 200E Family Leaks: Up to 12 P-Cores and 5.9 GHz ST Boost

Thanks to a new table specification matrix published by a known leaker Jaykihn on X, we are seeing the final specifications of Intel's long-rumored "Bartlett Lake-S" Core 200E family of CPUs with P-Cores only. This platform is designed to fit inside Intel's LGA-1700 socket, but from a consumer standpoint represents a non-existent product that will not reach their hands, as Intel has abandoned the plan to launch this highly anticipated gamer CPU. Instead, Intel will only offer it for its edge and embedded products. At the top of the stack is the Core 9 273 PQE SKU, which is a 12 P-Core variant with 24 threads and a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. This model can boost all of its 12 cores to 5.3 GHz, while a single thread can go up to 5.9 GHz independently for tasks that require intensive single-threaded performance. It is equipped with 36 MB of L3 cache and an integrated GPU with 32 EUs of Xe-LP graphics.

Interestingly, the entire lineup is separated into three categories. One is a high-TDP PQE with a base power of 125 W, while the middle PE models are 65 W designs with lower clocks. The weakest models are the PTE SKUs that have a TDP of 45 W, which are more ideal for edge deployments where power/efficiency is the most important factor. Across the lineup, there are versions with 8, 10, and 12 cores, all with Hyper-Threading for 16, 20, and 24 threads. Some SKUs from the PE and PTE lineups do not enjoy Intel vPro and ECC memory support, while the PQE high-power SKUs are all equipped with vPro and ECC memory support. You can check out the complete table comparison and product segmentation below for more specific information on different models.
Finally, it is again worth pointing out that Intel will not officially support these CPUs on its LGA-1700 platforms for gamers. Some motherboard manufacturers might release BIOS updates for their LGA-1700 boards to support these CPUs, but an official launch for consumers is no longer planned. Intel basically scrapped that idea and instead decided to push out the "Arrow Lake Refresh" for the LGA-1851 rather than bringing another CPU generation to its older LGA-1700. Companies like ASRock have confirmed that the "Bartlett Lake-S" Core 200E will not be coming to consumer motherboards and will instead only end up in the embedded and edge computer sector.
Sources: @jaykihn0 on X, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

20 Comments on Intel's "Bartlett Lake-S" Core 200E Family Leaks: Up to 12 P-Cores and 5.9 GHz ST Boost

#1
kondamin
probably would have sold the production run to people stuck on ddr4 lga1700
Posted on Reply
#2
jesdals
Shame that they didnt release it to customer parts would be a good gesture from intel
Posted on Reply
#3
freeagent
50MHz higher than my 9900X.. progress!
Posted on Reply
#5
Jedi2155
That is a stupid business decision IMO, given that there are several possible benefits of it vs. the AMD competitor. Leaving money on the table IMO, unless they are supply constrained.

Also compared to a 9900X, its a monolithic die vs. having 12 cores split between 2 CCD's and an IO Die.
Posted on Reply
#6
twin_savage
Jedi2155Also compared to a 9900X, its a monolithic die vs. having 12 cores split between 2 CCD's and an IO Die.
it also doesn't have anemic memory bandwidth which is very beneficial for certain workloads.
Posted on Reply
#8
AntiX3DGlazer
I cannot wait for this to get tested and for people to find out that no, 12+0 is not in fact faster for gaming than 8+16.
Jedi2155That is a stupid business decision IMO, given that there are several possible benefits of it vs. the AMD competitor.
I suppose if you consider using an outdated process node and old core IP "benefits", this will be the perfect chip for you
twin_savageit also doesn't have anemic memory bandwidth which is very beneficial for certain workloads.
if you're memory bandwitdh constrained just buy Arrow Lake. It's probably faster than BTL would be anyways (y'know, 32 modern threads vs 24 relatively slow ones).
Posted on Reply
#9
DAPUNISHER
jesdalsShame that they didnt release it to customer parts would be a good gesture from intel
It is indeed a bummer. I get that selling the silicon to big biz has better revenue and margins. But even a limited release similar to the 7600X3D at MicroCenter and MIndFactory would generate great buzz.
Posted on Reply
#10
AntiX3DGlazer
DAPUNISHERIt is indeed a bummer. I get that selling the silicon to big biz has better revenue and margins. But even a limited release similar to the 7600X3D at MicroCenter and MIndFactory would generate great buzz.
It doesn't perform better than RPL at gaming, why bother? Also will lose to E-cores in MT heavy workloads. There's literally 0 benefit to releasing this on desktop.
Posted on Reply
#11
kondamin
AntiX3DGlazerIt doesn't perform better than RPL at gaming, why bother? Also will lose to E-cores in MT heavy workloads. There's literally 0 benefit to releasing this on desktop.
Bunch of people have lga1700 systems with lower end chips that could do with an upgrade
Posted on Reply
#12
El_Capitan
kondaminBunch of people have lga1700 systems with lower end chips that could do with an upgrade
Still using an overclocked 13600K as my main. I really don't see a need to upgrade for a long while, as much as I'd like to have the fastest and most expensive CPU, if I could afford it.
Posted on Reply
#13
Apocalypsee
That is sad, I'm planning to go to LGA 1700 with to reuse my DDR4, you guys think it's worth it from my current 5700G? Or should I get 5800x3d instead?
Posted on Reply
#14
El_Capitan
ApocalypseeThat is sad, I'm planning to go to LGA 1700 with to reuse my DDR4, you guys think it's worth it from my current 5700G? Or should I get 5800x3d instead?
Whatever flavor you prefer. A 13600K will last you a good long time, performing ~10% better than a 5800X3D in games at 1080P, but if you're playing at 2K or 4K, it'll be ~5% to about even. For everything else, a 5800X3D will be about 25% slower.
Posted on Reply
#15
kondamin
El_CapitanStill using an overclocked 13600K as my main. I really don't see a need to upgrade for a long while, as much as I'd like to have the fastest and most expensive CPU, if I could afford it.
Maybe someone is still playing around on a i3 12xxx a fresh batch lga1700 chips that have all mitigations baked in would be a welcome option for a significant upgrade that would last past the current hardware shortages.
Posted on Reply
#16
Melvis
ApocalypseeThat is sad, I'm planning to go to LGA 1700 with to reuse my DDR4, you guys think it's worth it from my current 5700G? Or should I get 5800x3d instead?
Get the 5800X3D

Posted on Reply
#17
DAPUNISHER
AntiX3DGlazerIt doesn't perform better than RPL at gaming, why bother?
Look at AM4 retail sales and you have the answer. Raptor has a terrible reputation. The 5 year warranty and 6 mitigations have done nothing to improve sales. Releasing a new CPU series free of the bad rep, faster for gaming than 12th gen, and all of the positive publicity from the long term platform support. It would be a good start to repairing their reputation with all of the PCMR members Intel has lost mindshare with.
AntiX3DGlazerAlso will lose to E-cores in MT heavy workloads. There's literally 0 benefit to releasing this on desktop.
Gaming drives retail sales/DIY. The Zen 3 6 and 8 cores that have been in the top 5 for sales for what feels like forever now, are not heavily outselling everything Intel because of their productivity performance.

Everything you wrote is logical. It is just that none of it matters to the large majority of DIY gamers. Throwing us a bone aka gaming centric DDR4 compatible Bartletts would be a big W.
Posted on Reply
#18
AntiX3DGlazer
kondaminBunch of people have lga1700 systems with lower end chips that could do with an upgrade
they should just buy a 13th gen part and run it at default settings. Will perform better at basically everything than a 12 P Raptor. Games that use more than 8 cores are more than happy on RPL's E-cores. If all 8 P-cores are saturated (a highly unlikely scenario given the nature of games), those extra cores aren't doing anything such that they need another strong P-core. Additionally, the 12 P-Cores will be significantly less power efficient than even 8+16 RPL which is itself a power guzzing inefficient CPU.
DAPUNISHERLook at AM4 retail sales and you have the answer. Raptor has a terrible reputation. The 5 year warranty and 6 mitigations have done nothing to improve sales. Releasing a new CPU series free of the bad rep, faster for gaming than 12th gen, and all of the positive publicity from the long term platform support. It would be a good start to repairing their reputation with all of the PCMR members Intel has lost mindshare with.
The point that I think that you're trying to make is that Intel needs these sales to make money? I agree that their finances are not the best but it is not a situation that would be remedied by suddenly refreshing all of their RPL chips, including this 12-P part that clocks lower than 8+16, has fewer cores, less cache, and would consume more power for the same nT and gaming performance as 8+16.
Posted on Reply
#19
regs
MelvisGet the 5800X3D

Unlikely AMD would make 9800X3D for AM4
Posted on Reply
#20
Melvis
regsUnlikely AMD would make 9800X3D for AM4
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 08:33 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts