Tuesday, March 31st 2026

Toshiba Begins Sampling of 30-34 TB SMR Nearline Hard Disk Drives

Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation ("Toshiba") has announced the M12 Series of 3.5-inch nearline hard disk drives (HDDs) for hyperscale and cloud service providers operating large-scale data centers. The new series uses Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) technology to deliver storage capacities ranging from 30 to 34 TB. Sample shipments have begun and Toshiba also plans to begin sample shipments of M12 drives that use Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) to deliver capacities of up to 28 TB in the third quarter of 2026.

Today is World Backup Day, the annual international initiative to remind companies and individuals of the importance of backing up and protecting their data. That need is now greater than ever, as the constant expansion of digital services and video content distribution, the widespread adoption of cloud services, and, most recently, the increasing use of data-hungry AI and data science, are driving forward immense growth in the volumes of data generated and stored worldwide.
The requirement from data centers, the repositories for most of the world's digital data, is for higher-capacity, better-performing HDDs to support more efficient system configurations. The M12 Series is designed to address this demand by significantly increasing storage capacity in the standard 3.5-inch nearline HDD form factor.

M12 Series drives leverage Toshiba's proprietary design and analysis technologies cultivated through the development of slim and compact products. They surpass previous generations (CMR MG11 and SMR MA11 Series) by incorporating an additional magnetic disk, for a total of 11 disks. Additionally, the recording media used in the M12 Series replaces the usual aluminium substrate with glass, which offers higher durability and enables a thinner design. Their enclosures are helium-filled, and the drives combine Toshiba's proprietary Flux Control Microwave-Assisted Magnetic Recording (FC-MAMR) technology with SMR, achieving storage capacities of 30 to 34 TB.

SMR technology increases recording density by overlapping data tracks in a manner similar to roof shingles. However, because of the data track overlap, random write operations can result in performance degradation. The M12 Series HDDs adopt a host-managed SMR architecture, in which the host system manages data placement and rewriting within the drive. This approach enables more efficient data handling and reduces performance degradation in server and storage system environments.

The new SMR HDDs reach a maximum data transfer rate of 282 MiB/s, an improvement of approximately 8 %, while power consumption per terabyte (W/TB) is approximately 18 % lower than that of the previous generation of products. Designed for continuous 24/7 operation, the M12 Series supports an annual workload rating of 550 TB and offers an MTTF/MTBF of 2.5 million hours, an annualized failure rate (AFR) of 0.35 %.

Looking ahead, Toshiba plans to further increase HDD capacity through the adoption of next-generation recording technologies, including Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR), and products featuring a 12-disk configuration. Increasing HDD capacity is key to addressing the constantly growing storage demands of data centers.
Source: Toshiba
Add your own comment

14 Comments on Toshiba Begins Sampling of 30-34 TB SMR Nearline Hard Disk Drives

#1
lexluthermiester
SMR isn't that bad as long as it's properly designed. I wonder how these drives will perform?
Posted on Reply
#2
HD64G
Kudos to them for trying to move forward a tech that most people think as history.
Posted on Reply
#3
Athena
these will be great for cold storage, and long term storage, but, I still wonder about the reliability of these things, the density is getting more and more crazy, so I wonder how they deal with bad sectors on these things?
Posted on Reply
#4
Wirko
Nomad76Designed for continuous 24/7 operation, the M12 Series supports an annual workload rating of 550 TB and offers an MTTF/MTBF of 2.5 million hours
It's very reliable as long as it's not written to, or read from, any much? 550 TB is 23 days of continuous writing or reading (if the data rate were always maximum). Are at least CMR datacenter drives rated for a load heavier than that?
Nomad76maximum data transfer rate of 282 MiB/s
This one is comical.
- the storage industry is historically the most ignorant of binary prefixes
- transfer rates are always given in decimal units, for all purposes, I've never seen an exception
- and now Toshiba discovers MiB?
Posted on Reply
#5
remixedcat
lexluthermiesterSMR isn't that bad as long as it's properly designed. I wonder how these drives will perform?
Only HM-SMR and only for certain applications. That's the only reasonable thing for SMR.
Nomad76nearline....SMR
SMR drives are not nearline they are cold/archive or WORM only. far from nearline!
Posted on Reply
#6
twin_savage
WirkoIt's very reliable as long as it's not written to, or read from, any much? 550 TB is 23 days of continuous writing or reading (if the data rate were always maximum). Are at least CMR datacenter drives rated for a load heavier than that?
This is an annual workload rating as opposed to lifetime, and it typical of CMR drives as well. If all you do is sequential transfers then a much higher number can be realized, in the pebibyte range since this rating is more a limitation of the arm assembly wearing out than anything else (see DA HDDs giving an annual workload per actuator rather than drive-wide).
WirkoThis one is comical.
- the storage industry is historically the most ignorant of binary prefixes
- transfer rates are always given in decimal units, for all purposes, I've never seen an exception
- and now Toshiba discovers MiB?
I'm all for dumping the metric prefixes and adopting binary prefixes, Seagate also started doing it several years ago.
Posted on Reply
#7
remixedcat
twin_savageSeagate
they do have this on their site and I don't see their capacities w TiB only TB
Posted on Reply
#8
twin_savage
remixedcatthey do have this on their site and I don't see their capacities w TiB only TB
I mean only for transfer rates.
Pretty much all the players are still using the metric prefixes to inflate their product specs for size.
Posted on Reply
#9
lexluthermiester
HD64GKudos to them for trying to move forward a tech that most people think as history.
The key point of these drives is high capacity. SMR can provide more storage space reliably. The performance is gimp'd compared to CMR, but if storage space is important, speed can be less of a concern, especially in drive arrays.
remixedcatOnly HM-SMR and only for certain applications. That's the only reasonable thing for SMR.
I somewhat disagree and there are some very technical reasons behind that position. I'm picking up what you're putting down though. For sheer performance of SMR drive arrays, you're not wrong. For example in a 4 or 5 drive DAS/NAS, these drives would provide an excellent value proposition. But even in a single drive situation, SMR is not useless. It's just not very fast.
remixedcatSMR drives are not nearline they are cold/archive or WORM only.
Wait, what now? SMR drives are not WORM(Write Once Read Many). They are readily re-writable and are still acceptable for drive array's. Were you thinking of something else?
Posted on Reply
#10
remixedcat
lexluthermiesterThe key point of these drives is high capacity. SMR can provide more storage space reliably. The performance is gimp'd compared to CMR, but if storage space is important, speed can be less of a concern, especially in drive arrays.


I somewhat disagree and there are some very technical reasons behind that position. I'm picking up what you're putting down though. For sheer performance of SMR drive arrays, you're not wrong. For example in a 4 or 5 drive DAS/NAS, these drives would provide an excellent value proposition. But even in a single drive situation, SMR is not useless. It's just not very fast.

Wait, what now? SMR drives are not WORM(Write Once Read Many). They are readily re-writable and are still acceptable for drive array's. Were you thinking of something else?
Well if you just wanna change something small whole zones have to be re-written so SMR isn't good for frequently written anything that's why me and many others say they are best as WORM/archive drives and not nearline frequently read and changed drives.
Posted on Reply
#11
lexluthermiester
remixedcatWell if you just wanna change something small whole zones have to be re-written so SMR isn't good for frequently written anything that's why me and many others say they are best as WORM/archive drives and not nearline frequently read and changed drives.
While there is merit to those points, it's not that bad. Very much less than optimal, but SMR is still functional as a standard hard drive. I have one(just one) and it's performance is good enough for everyday use. However, in the use-case Toshiba is marketing these drive for, they are absolutely suitable for nearline functionality, especially in large arrays
Posted on Reply
#12
remixedcat
lexluthermiesterWhile there is merit to those points, it's not that bad. Very much less than optimal, but SMR is still functional as a standard hard drive. I have one(just one) and it's performance is good enough for everyday use. However, in the use-case Toshiba is marketing these drive for, they are absolutely suitable for nearline functionality, especially in large arrays
Which SMR drive do you have?
Posted on Reply
#13
DaemonForce
Nomad76Today is World Backup Day
Right after one of THE biggest repos on the Internets shut down. Funny.
Pouring one out for a real one. We keep losing them left and right.
I better not hear a streamer lose their data today. It's too much.
Posted on Reply
#14
lexluthermiester
remixedcatWhich SMR drive do you have?
It's a Western Digital Blue 5400RPM drive.
DaemonForceRight after one of THE biggest repos on the Internets shut down.
Link?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 04:11 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts