Monday, July 13th 2026

Intel 18A Silicon Goes to Space with "Starfire" Processors

Intel's 18A node is officially space-grade, according to documentation on Intel's website. A document that initially went unnoticed has been published, detailing a new "Starfire" generation of processors built on the 18A node and designed for space operations. Intel has designated two SKUs for orbital computing, each equipped with four P-Cores and four LPE-Cores, resulting in an eight-core SoC design. One is optimized for low-power operations with clocks adjusted for efficiency, while the other is designed for performance. The Low Power edition tunes its four P-Cores to 1.0 GHz, while the four LPE-Cores run at 850 MHz. For the Performance version, Intel has increased the frequency of P-Cores to 3.1 GHz, with LPE-Cores reaching up to 2.1 GHz.

Both SKUs feature a GPU tile built on the Intel 3 node, which includes 4 Xe cores with 64 EUs. On the Low Power SKU, these Xe cores operate between 800 MHz and 1.0 GHz, while the Performance SKU boosts this to 2.0 GHz. The total package for the Low Power version remains at 10 W TDP, while the Performance SKU is capped at 35 W TDP. Additionally, Intel includes an NPU on both versions, with a compute capability of 45 TOPS on the Low Power version and up to 75 TOPS on the Performance SKU using INT8 precision. Beyond specifications, "Starfire" can operate within a T-Junction range from -55°C to 125°C. This range, alongside TID, SEL, and SEE radiation hardening certifications, introduces the first 18A silicon to space, ideal for orbital computation. Intel targets this quarter, Q3, for samples.
For those unaware, space computing requires additional radiation hardening for processors before they are deployed. Space is an unpredictable environment full of ionizing radiation that can penetrate CPUs, causing sudden bit-flips, which jeopardize data integrity and computation accuracy. Therefore, every silicon chip destined for space must undergo radiation hardening to prevent degradation from long-term radiation exposure and protect against short-term high-energy particles impacting the CPU.
Sources: Intel, via x86deadandback on X
Add your own comment

19 Comments on Intel 18A Silicon Goes to Space with "Starfire" Processors

#1
kondamin
plain old XE cores or XE3?
Posted on Reply
#2
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
kondaminplain old XE cores or XE3?
It's 18A which means Panther Lake which means Xe3.
Posted on Reply
#3
Wirko
ECC memory support, by any chance?
Posted on Reply
#4
outlw
WirkoECC memory support, by any chance?
If it is made for space applications, I would assume that it would exclusively be paired with ECC memory.
Posted on Reply
#5
kondamin
dgianstefaniIt's 18A which means Panther Lake which means Xe3.
The gpu tile is on intel 3, and with 64 EU's you would be pretty much the same size as the 12 core part
Posted on Reply
#6
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
kondaminThe gpu tile is on intel 3, and with 64 EU's you would be pretty much the same size as the 12 core part
No I understand the GPU tile is on a different process, but since the only 18A product is Panther Lake, there's very little chance they, for some reason, forward ported an older GPU architecture alongside the CPU.
Posted on Reply
#7
RogueSix
Good luck with that. It's not exactly a distant memory when their 13th and 14th gen CPUs died like flies from degradation (Vmin Shift super-debacle). I wouldn't want to be an astronaut on an Intel-powered space capsule. Hopefully, they'll use Intel only for unmanned missions (very cheap ones, too, and not something valuable like the launch of a space telescope).
Posted on Reply
#8
shuffy_losys
RogueSixGood luck with that. It's not exactly a distant memory when their 13th and 14th gen CPUs died like flies from degradation (Vmin Shift super-debacle). I wouldn't want to be an astronaut on an Intel-powered space capsule. Hopefully, they'll use Intel only for unmanned missions (very cheap ones, too, and not something valuable like the launch of a space telescope).
Hardware made for adverse environments like space and high altitudes tend to be specc'd much more conservatively than consumer hardware. I'd bet even Raptor Lake marketed towards space applications wouldn't suffer from the degradation problem because it wouldn't even boost and need those voltages to begin with.
Posted on Reply
#9
psychemist
Large minimum feature size is the major ruggedization method for anything CMOS intended to work beyond low earth orbit. 1.8 nm minimum feature size is NOT ruggedized for space, unless its meant to hug the ground under the thickest parts of the magnetosphere. Cosmic rays push charge around too much, and can flip random bits on impact unless a bit is stored/transmitted with enough electrons. Drop in a thimble vs drop in a bucket, except drops are bullets moving relatavistically. "Armor" does next to nothing to ruggedize, only a thick magnetic field helps to slow down the ion bullets. Carrying a big B field on your ship is still really expen$$$ive, so "all chips have large features" (fewer features per chip size) is really the only way to fly.

Seems that word hasn't gotten out to everyone about *just how harsh* space is to electronics. Folks tend to assume vacuum is the only hazard in space - boy, is it not. Radiation-induced bit errors is the main reason that the mounted compute on even the newest space probes is so feeble compared to any modern smart phone. Better that than really fast with tons of cosmic-ray-induced bit-flip errors! "What? It didn't boot AGAIN??? That's 22 times in a row?!? It was just fine right after main engine cut off!!!"
Posted on Reply
#10
Wirko
RogueSixGood luck with that. It's not exactly a distant memory when their 13th and 14th gen CPUs died like flies from degradation (Vmin Shift super-debacle). I wouldn't want to be an astronaut on an Intel-powered space capsule. Hopefully, they'll use Intel only for unmanned missions (very cheap ones, too, and not something valuable like the launch of a space telescope).
Mission critical systems should be on 90 nm anyway but the spy subsystem on a spy satellite could use some modern NPU.
Posted on Reply
#11
shuffy_losys
WirkoMission critical systems should be on 90 nm anyway but the spy subsystem on a spy satellite could use some modern NPU.
That brings up a good point.

Mostly that I don't think this processor is going to be used on things actually making sure the thing in space doesn't fall back down prematurely and can maintain communication with mission control. Or with things that have people in them, any life support equipment. It'll likely be used on the application side of the thing in space so if fails, it won't turn the thing into more space junk (well, depending on how much its owner cares about disposing of it)
Posted on Reply
#12
melkor_unlimited
kondaminplain old XE cores or XE3?
dgianstefaniIt's 18A which means Panther Lake which means Xe3.
Exccept ...
GPU tile is made on Intel 3.
Which may or may not be the Plain Xe3 and not Xe3P.
dgianstefaniNo I understand the GPU tile is on a different process, but since the only 18A product is Panther Lake, there's very little chance they, for some reason, forward ported an older GPU architecture alongside the CPU.
The compute tile may be Panther Lake or Wildcat.
As it is 4P + 4 LPE .. its more like Wildcat.
Posted on Reply
#13
Wirko
psychemistWhat? It didn't boot AGAIN??? That's 22 times in a row?!?
Yeah, boot. We probably think of logic and RAM first but among critical components there are also SSDs. They must use some sort of ancient large-cell SLC SSDs, with lots of ECC on top, to make a reliable space computer.
Posted on Reply
#14
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
melkor_unlimitedExccept ...
GPU tile is made on Intel 3.
Which may or may not be the Plain Xe3 and not Xe3P.


The compute tile may be Panther Lake or Wildcat.
As it is 4P + 4 LPE .. its more like Wildcat.
Wildcat is 2+4 and still uses the same CPU/GPU architecture as Panther Lake, so it's still Xe3.
Posted on Reply
#15
melkor_unlimited
dgianstefani... so it's still Xe3.
There are some small details which tell apart the Xe3 (2 or 4 EU Intel Graphic aka Batlemage+) and Xe3P (12 or 10 EU Intel® Arc™ aka Celestial).
Posted on Reply
#16
lexluthermiester
WirkoECC memory support, by any chance?
outlw6669If it is made for space applications, I would assume that it would exclusively be paired with ECC memory.
Registered ECC. It's a requirement for space-based applications. Cosmic radiation is a much bigger problem outside the atmosphere.
Posted on Reply
#17
Prima.Vera
How do they shield it for background space radiation on such low node process?
I thought the older, way bigger nodes are preferred due to the radiation sensitivity of the transistors.
Posted on Reply
#18
lexluthermiester
Prima.VeraHow do they shield it for background space radiation on such low node process?
I thought the older, way bigger nodes are preferred due to the radiation sensitivity of the transistors.
Good question. Maybe a lead mesh lined housing chassis?
Posted on Reply
#19
EsaT
shuffy_losysHardware made for adverse environments like space and high altitudes tend to be specc'd much more conservatively than consumer hardware. I'd bet even Raptor Lake marketed towards space applications wouldn't suffer from the degradation problem because it wouldn't even boost and need those voltages to begin with.
Some "internal cause" degradation is by far the smallest worry in space applications.
It's the external causes, meaning all the radiation and particle bombardment, which is the problem.

Single incoming cosmic ray proton can cause cascade of "secondary radiation" being released capable to causing whole bunch of bit errors or straight damage.
And vulnerability to that increases propably something like exponentially when transistors etc components of circuiry get smaller.
Only Koolaid drinker would use any "modern" node IC in pretty much anything above 1% important in space.

Already passenger jet cruise altitude is enough to start increasing dose of radiation coming from space.
And achieving any good degree of protection from radiation is one of the biggest challenges for manned long term space flights outside Earth's magnetic field.
Bigger eruption in Sun can be huge issue for astronauts on Moon flight and even on ISS (inside Earth's magnetic field) astronauts move into specific module during stronger "space weather".
lexluthermiesterGood question. Maybe a lead mesh lined housing chassis?
Weight is at extreme premium in things sent to space.
And that cosmic ray doesn't really care if it hits that IC directly or acceptable weight casing around it. That cascade of secondary radiation particles can be released either way.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 17:34 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts