Monday, April 15th 2019

MSI Betrays AMD's Socket AM4 Longevity Promise: No Zen2 for 300-series?

Greedy motherboard vendors such as MSI want you to buy a new motherboard every two generations of processor for no sound reason at all. MSI is reportedly blocking support for 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse" processors on its AMD 300-series chipset motherboards, including those based on high-end AMD X370 and OC-capable B350 chipsets. This would also put those who own $300 motherboards such as the X370 XPower out of luck. To recap, AMD announced on numerous occasions that it doesn't want to be a greedy clique like its competitor, by forcing motherboard upgrades and promised that socket AM4 motherboards will be backwards and forwards compatible with at least four generations of Ryzen processors, running all the way up to 2020.

This normally should mean that any 300-series motherboard must support 4th generation Ryzen processors with a simple BIOS update. Most 300-series motherboards, including from MSI, even ship with USB BIOS Flashback feature to help with forwards compatibility. Unfortunately, motherboard companies such as MSI care more about their bottom-lines than the consumer. In a support e-mail to an X370 XPower Titanium owner, MSI confirmed that it will not extend Zen 2 support to AMD 300-series. Other motherboard vendors could follow MSI's suit as a representative of another motherboard vendor, on condition of anonymity, told TechPowerUp that "Zen 2" processors have steeper electrical requirements that 300-series motherboards don't meet. This is an excuse similar to the one Intel gave for the planned obsolescence of its 100-series and 200-series chipsets, even as it was repeatedly proven that those motherboards can run and overclock 9th generation processors with custom firmware just fine. Would MSI care to explain whether a B450M PRO-M2 has a stronger VRM than an X370 XPower Titanium to warrant "Zen 2" support? Will all "Zen 2" processor SKUs have steep electrical requirements? Will there not be any SKUs with double-digit-Watt TDP ratings?

Update (16/04): MSI posted a clarification on this issue.
Source: master3553 (Reddit)
Add your own comment

335 Comments on MSI Betrays AMD's Socket AM4 Longevity Promise: No Zen2 for 300-series?

#226
EarthDog
MSI will be coming out with a proper statement to clarify the position soon.
Stay tuned to your reputable news sites/MSI for info. ;)

Hint: it supports them...but what exactly?
Posted on Reply
#227
moproblems99
king of swag187But the promise of unlimited upgrade potential is no longer true, is it not?
Well, unlimited? No, certainly not. I believe what they said was that they were using AM4 through 2020. Unlimited would carry past 2020, would it not?
Posted on Reply
#228
R-T-B
Assimilatorwww.guru3d.com/news-story/ryzen-zen-2-procs-incompatible-with-older-300-series-due-to-bios-limitation.html





TPU "news" staff, y'all should be extremely ashamed that Guru3D just did a better job than you.
While the wording is unprofessional, the 16MB bios arguement is horsecrap.

I'm not just talking out of my rear either, bios modding is something I do and did for Ryzen. I know how much free space is on these boards, and it is a lot.
RH92True Guru 3D did some proper work instead of simply calling MSI greedy but still doesn't explain why Asus has already pushed bios with Zen 2 support on their 300 series so the chip limitation argument can't explain everything !
As I said, that arguement is factually false. Do ya'll need a layout screenshot or something?
Posted on Reply
#229
notb
EarthDogHint: it supports them...but what exactly?
"Upcoming processors"? ;-)
Posted on Reply
#230
R-T-B
notbIf I posted a thread that this AGESA provides Zen 3 compatibility, would someone from AMD come to correct it?
No, but every bios modder in town (myself included) would likely call you out. I personally haven't checked the microcode yet but will do so now.
Posted on Reply
#231
londiste
R-T-BWhile the wording is unprofessional, the 16MB bios arguement is horsecrap.
I'm not just talking out of my rear either, bios modding is something I do and did for Ryzen. I know how much free space is on these boards, and it is a lot.
What was the deal last summer with some motherboards dropping Bristol Ridge support and 4xx series boards getting 256mbit chips?
Posted on Reply
#232
R-T-B
londisteWhat was the deal last summer with some motherboards dropping Bristol Ridge support and 4xx series boards getting 256mbit chips?
Bristol ridge? That's the APU right? Probably GOP tables and sub-vbios for the igpu. Those can be a little hefty actually.

That is an interesting theory. It could be they are so insistent on cramming igpu support in there that they are filling the chips literally with OTHER vbioses for many subtypes of igpus that may or may not be installed.

That'd be astonishingly inefficient, but would explain the arguement and also why I don't see it... I always rip the igpu bioses out!

As for "why 256mbit chips?" it's not due to size needs I think as much as manufacturing has largely shifted to them and they are cheap now.
Posted on Reply
#233
londiste
Amd/comments/bdv775tl;dr
Wrong info.

Translation by someone in Reddit thread:
"Sadly the informaton regarding the support of upcoming AMD CPUs on the X370 Titanium was wrong.
We want to shed light on this situation.
Currently we are testing our current mainboard portfolio with MSI 300 and 400 chipsets for compability with upcoming AMD Ryzen processors. Of course we want to provide support for upcoming AMD Ryzen processors on as many mainboards as possible.
Before AMD launches the next generation of CPUs MSI will provide a comprehensive list of compatible MSI AM4 mainboards. We are sorry for the misunderstanding."
@btarunr you might want to add that to the story ;)
Posted on Reply
#234
EarthDog
notb"Upcoming processors"? ;-)
Chipsets. Stick with us. :)
Posted on Reply
#235
notb
londisteAmd/comments/bdv775tl;dr
Wrong info.
I don't see how this is an improvement over the earlier rumor.
They're testing compatibility.
They want to support upcoming Ryzen processors on as many motherboards as they can.
They will provide a list of compatible AM4 motherboards.

This is miles away from "all Ryzen work on all AM4" that many here hoped for. It seems there is in fact a big probability that some existing AM4 mobos won't work with at least some of Zen2 CPUs.
notb"Upcoming processors"? ;-)
... and this turned out to be correct! :-D The "official response" doesn't mention neither "Zen 2" nor "Ryzen 3000-series".
Posted on Reply
#236
EarthDog
notbThis is miles away from "all Ryzen work on all AM4" that many here hoped for.
It's also approximately the same distance away from "betrayal" and "greed".

It's a shame the direction TPU is going in with news and some reviews. Grammar mistakes (some not corrected after it was mentioned), blatent misrepresentation (and no retraction) of information, copy/paste news, zero follow up by a reviewer when a user asks a question. My RSS feed just got leaner. Terrible.

Wait for MSI to officially respond, not round 2 of Tier 1 muppet support. :)
Posted on Reply
#237
R0H1T
notbThis is miles away from "all Ryzen work on all AM4" that many here hoped for. It seems there is in fact a big probability that some existing AM4 mobos won't work with at least some of Zen2 CPUs.
And now you've gone into the "I know it's not possible, yet I'll say it anyway" territory. That's never been the case especially with high end CPUs, ever - not with FX9590, 1950x, 2990WX, 9900k, 9990XE nor W3175x :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#238
lexluthermiester
medi01MSI's CEO has claimed commitment to get Intel's market share up.
Unless you have a credible citation, I'm calling BS on this...
medi01Hurting own AMD mainboard sales might be part of the grand plan.
And this. No company is going hurt it's own bottomline like that.
Posted on Reply
#239
notb
EarthDogIt's also approximately the same distance away from "betrayal" and "greed".

It's a shame the direction TPU is going in with news and some reviews. Grammar mistakes (some not corrected after it was mentioned), blatent misrepresentation (and no retraction) of information, copy/paste news, zero follow up by a reviewer when a user asks a question. My RSS feed just got leaner. Terrible.
Well... TPU is what it is. Nothing we can do about it.
I mean: in the end they even won the software key case. Close few threads, remove few posts, give few warnings. Very basic measures clearly worked. There's hardly any reaction to the key news they posted today. :-)
Wait for MSI to officially respond, not round 2 of Tier 1 muppet support. :)
The only thing I'm interested in is the official CPU compatibility list. Until the add rows there (even temporary ones like "Ryzen 3000-series") it's all just curiosities.
Posted on Reply
#241
R0H1T
That's a tongue in cheek comment, nothing to be upset about.
Posted on Reply
#242
Unregistered
notbWell... TPU is what it is. Nothing we can do about it.
I mean: in the end they even won the software key case. Close few threads, remove few posts, give few warnings. Very basic measures clearly worked. There's hardly any reaction to the key news they posted today. :)

The only thing I'm interested in is the official CPU compatibility list. Until the add rows there (even temporary ones like "Ryzen 3000-series") it's all just curiosities.
Egg and face, seems you were wrong, and 300 series will support zen2. This is the reason why Asus and the others updated the 300 MB's as they must have been pretty darn confident they were compatible.

Go climb back under your rock......
Posted on Edit | Reply
#243
medi01
R0H1Tnothing to be upset about.
Yeah, not like we didn't see something like that before, and with Compaq, no less, and when AMD was offering them CPUs for free.



Just a market Jaggernaut having certain kind of influence, ya know. It's MSI itself kinda concluding that, nobody forced them to, right?
Posted on Reply
#245
EarthDog
You said......
medi01MSI's CEO has claimed commitment to get Intel's market share up.
Hurting own AMD mainboard sales might be part of the grand plan.
I highly doubt they will shoot themselves in the foot to bring back Intel. All this is saying is that they will CONTINUE to use Intel chips in their laptops and such which, by his own admission, isn't having supply issues since laptops come before desktop. You also neglected to list the other reasons why they currently do not use AMD processors in their laptops... let's go ahead and post those.
  • Experimentation: MSI is a smaller company than some and can't afford to experiment with different platforms right now. "I always say 'we are not big enough to make it so complicated,'" he told us. He cited all of the different gaming laptop SKUs MSI makes, from the high-end GT series to the budget GLs, when saying that their lineup is already pretty complex. He also posited that it, given the company's focus on optimizing the user experience, going with AMD adds another layer of complexity.
  • Prior bad experience: MSI has used AMD processors in its systems before, but apparently had a bad experience. "At that time, their product was not right and their support was not that good," Chiang said. He didn't say which AMD CPU he was referring to, but we know that 2012's MSI GX60 had an AMD A10 chip inside. Our sister site, Laptop Mag, reviewed that laptop at the time and really liked the performance and battery life.
They will not sacrifice their current breadwinner on the mobo side of things to go all in with Intel to gain market share when they get their shit straight. Surely they will run a promo or something, that's normal. Otherwise, your assertion leaves a lot to be desired from the quoted text.
Posted on Reply
#246
medi01
EarthDogI highly doubt
What to do, when MSI CEO literally states he'd "sit down with" Intel, once supply issues are resolved, on "how to get their market share back"?
Or when MSI CEO says, doing notebooks wouldn't be that nice, because of those special relationships with Intel?

Try to downplay it with own invaluable "doubts".
Cool.

So, after all, he wouldn't want to ruin his own company, would he? And figure, when there is next shortage, he gets none of those goddamnawfulgamingperf Intel notebook chips?
So it's pure and clear business. Nothing to be alarmed about.
Basic capitalism.
Posted on Reply
#247
lexluthermiester
medi01Oh, boy, are you judging me by greenboi standards?



www.tomshardware.com/news/msi-ceo-interview-intel-shortage-amd,38473.html


The notebook part is amazing on its own.
Wow, context much? Not only that statement, but the rest of the interview. What you did earlier is called "cherry-picking" a statement to fit your personal narrative. Chiang did not imply that MSI was going to help Intel raise it's market share at the cost of it's own AMD business.
Posted on Reply
#248
R-T-B
champsilvaYou know this was a later response right?
Yes. I'm still kinda ashamed there are no corrections here...
Posted on Reply
#249
medi01
lexluthermiester"cherry-picking" a statement
On which bloody planet is this "cherry picking a statement", the whole f*kcing conversation was cited verbatim:

lexluthermiesterChiang did not imply that MSI was going to help Intel raise it's market share at the cost of it's own AMD business.
-MSI is working on getting Intel's share back
-No way, I call BS!
-<citation>
-Oh, oh, that, but that's not at MSI's expense!

Pathetic.
Posted on Reply
#250
lexluthermiester
medi01On which bloody planet is this "cherry picking a statement", the whole f*kcing conversation was cited verbatim:
Except that you didn't quote the whole conversation. You quoted one sentence(the highlighted one) and took it out of context. Example;
medi01-MSI is working on getting Intel's share back
That is not what Chiang said or even how he said it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 11:10 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts