Friday, August 26th 2022

LG Announces UltraGear 240Hz Curved OLED Gaming Monitor

LG Electronics (LG) is unveiling its latest premium monitors at IFA 2022 in Berlin, Germany, including the superb, new UltraGear OLED gaming monitor (model 45GR95QE). LG's first curved OLED display with a 240Hz refresh rate, the 45-inch model is designed for immersive gaming experiences, offering the visual performance, speed and features serious gamers demand.

Visitors to LG's booth at IFA 2022 can explore a wide range of cutting-edge LG monitor products, including the new UltraGear and the UltraFine Display Ergo AI (model 32UQ890), which delivers a truly customizable setup for superior user comfort at home or at the office.
UltraGear OLED Gaming Monitor
In addition to being LG's first 45-inch curved OLED gaming monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio and WQHD (3440 x 1440) resolution, the 45GR95QE is also the company's first-ever display to combine a 45-inch screen-size with an 800R curvature; a pairing that helps boost users' sense of immersion. A genuine gaming powerhouse, the 45GR95QE will be displayed at IFA 2022 along with LG's impressive 48GQ900 UltraGear OLED gaming monitor.
As one would expect, the company's newest gaming monitor ramps up the realism and responsiveness, offering excellent picture quality as well as unrivaled speed. Along with a 240Hz refresh rate and 0.1 millisecond Gray-to-Gray (GTG) response time, the 45GR95QE provides 98.5 percent coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, superior HDR10 performance and support for HDMI 2.1 - including features such as Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) - and DisplayPort 1.4. Thanks to its large size, 21:9 aspect ratio, borderless design and 800R screen curvature, the new UltraGear helps transport users into their favorite PC or console games as few other monitors can. What's more, it is also the ideal size for most desk setups and offers smooth multitasking with features such as Picture-by-Picture (PBP) and Picture-in-Picture (PIP).

The UltraGear brand's first curved OLED gaming monitor, the 45GR95QE delivers the same, stellar OLED picture quality as its predecessor (model 48GQ900) while adding an 800R curvature and LG's Anti-glare & Low Reflection coating. These key enhancements help to increase users' sense of being in the game, enveloping them in the onscreen action and reducing annoying, visual distractions at the same time. LG's industry-leading OLED display technology also puts less strain on users' eyes, which is especially helpful for those who enjoy losing themselves in long, uninterrupted gaming sessions.

UltraFine Display Ergo AI
LG's UltraFine Display Ergo AI is making its much-anticipated debut at IFA 2022. The groundbreaking 32UQ890 is the first LG monitor capable of automatically adjusting its position to ensure continued ergonomic comfort throughout the day. With a built-in camera leveraging advanced AI, the UltraFine Display Ergo AI can continuously analyze the posture of the user - making subtle changes to screen height (0 ~ 160mm) and tilt (-20º ~ +20º) to prevent them from remaining in a single position for too long or from falling into poor posture over time. The 32UQ890 has three ergonomics-enhancing modes: AI Motion, Continuous Motion and Periodic Motion. AI Motion, which will be demonstrated at LG's booth during IFA, tracks the user's eye-level and adjusts height and tilt whenever a change is detected.
LG's UltraFine Display Ergo AI sports a 31.5-inch 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS display with 95 percent coverage of DCI-P3 and excellent HDR image reproduction. The combination of a premium, high-resolution screen and an articulated stand that can be intelligently adjusted by LG's AI technology, the 32UQ890 is a customized, comfort-enhancing workstation solution for busy professionals.

"LG's portfolio of innovative products on show at IFA 2022 embraces the latest trends and technologies to meet the needs and lifestyles of today's diverse consumers," said Seo Young-jae, senior vice president and head of the IT business unit of LG Electronics Business Solutions Company. "Our brand-new UltraGear OLED gaming monitor elevates the gaming experience with its curved screen, anti-glare solution and ultra-fast 240Hz refresh rate, while the UltraFine Display Ergo AI delivers outstanding user comfort with its ergonomic features and futuristic design. We're excited to debut both of these exceptional products at IFA and to be back on the ground in Berlin after a two-year break due to the pandemic."

LG's exhibition booth (Hall 18, Messe Berlin) at IFA 2022 from September 2-6 will give visitors the opportunity to experience the company's very latest consumer electronics innovations, including its new display solutions for productivity (Ergo) and entertainment/gaming (UltraGear).
Add your own comment

46 Comments on LG Announces UltraGear 240Hz Curved OLED Gaming Monitor

#26
Valantar
dgianstefaniit's 1440p height but has more pixels width, 3440, not 2560, so AFAIK, haven't done math, pixel density should be similar to existing 32" 1440p monitors, which I have, and don't have issues with pixel density at the distance I sit from.

I mean, sure, higher PPI is nice to have, but is it realistic to drive anything more at 240hz? I don't think so. So I guess you're right, PPI is the only compromise, but it's not one I care about in this instance.

This is for my 32" G7 which I don't really have issues with at normal viewing distance.


Anyone know if it's pentile or has a good subpixel arrangement?
For gaming it's perfectly fine. For text rendering it'll be garbage. This is clearly the same panel as that bendable Corsair, which has a whopping 83ppi. For reference, 1080p on a 24" monitor matches your 32" 1440p at 92ppi. 83 is noticeably lower than that, and will look visibly more pixelated at the same viewing distance. Of course, viewing a 45" monitor at regular viewing distances isn't really feasible in the first place (though it's a great candidate for variable rate shading! they could just reduce the render resolution of the two outer thirds of the panel by about 75%, and nobody would know!), which kind of renders this moot. But it's still lower pixel density than a 50" 2160p TV, and barely more than a 55" TV.

I have no doubt this will be a great gaming monitor for those with a large enough desk and room, but for most people - with normal sized rooms, normal sized desks, and mixed use cases - it's too large, too low resolution for its size, and likely way too expensive.
Posted on Reply
#27
Solidstate89
dgianstefaniSo you can lean back in your chair, relax, and enjoy 240hz blur free gaming with true 1ms pixel response not just grey to grey, with the contrast of OLED.

For work, it's the same as any other large monitor, literally just move it further back on the desk and you won't see the pixels. I know it's not ideal, 4k240hz is pretty much what you want at this size, but nothing, literally no GPU that exists, can drive that, I doubt RTX4xxx and RX7xxx will be able to drive that either.
There's already a 34" OLED monitor out there at the exact same resolution. Why would I want the same resolution on a bigger screen? Again, worthless.
Posted on Reply
#28
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Solidstate89There's already a 34" OLED monitor out there at the exact same resolution. Why would I want the same resolution on a bigger screen? Again, worthless.
Same refresh rate?
Posted on Reply
#29
Makaveli
ValantarI have no doubt this will be a great gaming monitor for those with a large enough desk and room, but for most people - with normal sized rooms, normal sized desks, and mixed use cases - it's too large, too low resolution for its size, and likely way too expensive.
1000%
Posted on Reply
#30
PapaTaipei
Aren't OLEDs inherently supposed to support extremely high refresh rates in the 1KHz ballpark?
Posted on Reply
#31
Legacy-ZA
dgianstefaniEvery time one of these is released (OLED HFR), I get more tempted.

Finally a panel that, on paper, has no compromises that I care about.

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
I just look at the price, then that temptation flees. :)
Posted on Reply
#32
defaultluser
dgianstefaniit's 1440p height but has more pixels width, 3440, not 2560, so AFAIK, haven't done math, pixel density should be similar to existing 32" 1440p monitors, which I have, and don't have issues with pixel density at the distance I sit from.

I mean, sure, higher PPI is nice to have, but is it realistic to drive anything more at 240hz? I don't think so. So I guess you're right, PPI is the only compromise, but it's not one I care about in this instance.

This is for my 32" G7 which I don't really have issues with at normal viewing distance.


Anyone know if it's pentile or has a good subpixel arrangement?
when comparing it to the Alienware 34" , the density will be much lower; this is already low enough to be visible!
Posted on Reply
#33
phanbuey
Also 800r is way too aggressive of a curve. Anything under 1500 starts to pincushion noticeably, 1000R is horrible, 800R is basically unusable. Great way to give yourself an instant migraine - low PPI and a giant curve on a huge display.
Posted on Reply
#34
Makaveli
phanbueyAlso 800r is way too aggressive of a curve. Anything under 1500 starts to pincushion noticeably, 1000R is horrible, 800R is basically unusable. Great way to give yourself an instant migraine - low PPI and a giant curve on a huge display.
Yup 1800/1900R is as much as a curve as I will deal with.
Posted on Reply
#35
geniekid
DP2.0 can't come fast enough. My hunch is that LG would have designed this to be 5K2K@144Hz if they weren't constrained by the bandwidth of DP1.4/HDMI2.1.

Even then, based on my understanding of the DP2.0 spec, I think we'll have to wait for DP2.1 or DP3 before 5K2K@240Hz is a possibility. :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#36
trsttte
geniekidDP2.0 can't come fast enough. My hunch is that LG would have designed this to be 5K2K@144Hz if they weren't constrained by the bandwidth of DP1.4/HDMI2.1.

Even then, based on my understanding of the DP2.0 spec, I think we'll have to wait for DP2.1 or DP3 before 5K2K@240Hz is a possibility. :shadedshu:
They could have used DSC for the higher refresh rates (and use DP2.0 already, it's retrocompatible)

DP2.0 UHBR 20 (80gbit) is enough for 5k2k 240hz 8bit
Posted on Reply
#37
FeelinFroggy
Everyone is complaining about pixel density has not seen the monitor yet. I think I would hold off on complaints about pixel density until you see it in action with your own eyes. Personally, I'm not gonna spend the money that this thing cost without seeing the picture with my eyes.

I dont think you can really complain about the size of the monitor because this is not made for writing research papers. This thing is made to game and I bet it's very immersive. So we cant complain that it wont do things well that its not really designed to do.

I have had the predator x34 since 2015 and it is a dream. I have told myself I wont buy another monitor until they make a 4k ultrawide gaming monitor. But the new Alienware ultrawide and now this monitor has me thinking the golden age of monitors is in full swing.
Posted on Reply
#38
silentbogo
Well, I guess I'm gonna have to wait another 3-4 years before we finally get a usable OLED monitor, and not a glorified OLED TV with techno-gimmicks. Just need something that fits on my desk(27-28") and won't cost me a kidney.
Gonna stick with my boringly-cheap Samsung U24E590 for now. I guess it's gonna move to my office no earlier than it's 10th birthday.
Posted on Reply
#39
Makaveli
FeelinFroggyEveryone is complaining about pixel density has not seen the monitor yet. I think I would hold off on complaints about pixel density until you see it in action with your own eyes. Personally, I'm not gonna spend the money that this thing cost without seeing the picture with my eyes.

I dont think you can really complain about the size of the monitor because this is not made for writing research papers. This thing is made to game and I bet it's very immersive. So we cant complain that it wont do things well that its not really designed to do.

I have had the predator x34 since 2015 and it is a dream. I have told myself I wont buy another monitor until they make a 4k ultrawide gaming monitor. But the new Alienware ultrawide and now this monitor has me thinking the golden age of monitors is in full swing.
I trust the math.

And I would rather go LG C2 42' if i'm going 40+ in size.

And regardless of that other stuff a 800R curve is just too aggressive.
Posted on Reply
#40
Veseleil
Lower PPI than my 23.8" 1080p display? No thanks. Seems that we won't get that sweet spot with OLED tech... They just can't achieve higher PPI, due to high brightness reduction on smaller, and pixel denser panels.
Posted on Reply
#41
konga
VeseleiloLower PPI than my 23.8" 1080p display? No thanks. Seems that we won't get that sweet spot with OLED tech... They just can't achieve higher PPI, due to high brightness reduction on smaller, and pixel denser panels.
There are other oled types that can reach high DPIs (like the ones used for phones), but they look bad when scaled up to monitor sizes. There's a type of OLED panel developed exclusively for monitors (used in the 32EP950 and 27EP950), but it's low refresh rate and not as impressively bright as OLED TVs. So LG and Samsung are just trying to shrink TV technology down. Samsung will get to 4K next year with QD-OLED, I think. They're off to the races once they get the new blue OLED material they've developed integrated into the manufacturing process. They're also building more manufacturing lines for it.
Posted on Reply
#42
Camm
Have to echo everyone else, the resolution for the screen size is too low.

Also, 24:10 is a superior aspect ratio, LG already make screens with this aspect ratio, so its disappointing to see LG reverting down to 21:9.
Posted on Reply
#43
Crackong
Xex360Here you go, it's true RGB as well:
www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-32ep950
Except it is entirely not for everyday / gaming use.
Professional panels should stay in professional world (and prices) like EIZO

Both LG and Samaung are fully capable of making consumer grade 27/32 inchs 4k/1440p FLAT OLED 120Hz panels.
Those will completely dominate the market.
I had no idea why they hesitate.
Posted on Reply
#44
Unregistered
CrackongExcept it is entirely not for everyday / gaming use.
Professional panels should stay in professional world (and prices) like EIZO

Both LG and Samaung are fully capable of making consumer grade 27/32 inchs 4k/1440p FLAT OLED 120Hz panels.
Those will completely dominate the market.
I had no idea why they hesitate.
Yeah it was more of a joke, apparently those are quite cheap for their level of quality.
I heard LG Display wants to stick with WRGB, as apparently it's better for most uses (compared to RGB), but on the bright side they are looking into more sizes, hopefully not this junk but like you suggested 32" 4k 120hz.
As for Samsung they should stop their stupid pentile arrangement, it is misleading with their fake resolutions, each pixel should have red,green,blue sub pixels else they should market it as 2/3 of the resolution.
#45
Space Lynx
Astronaut
ChaitanyaVery low pixel density is a big compromise, 1440p 21:9 on 34" is 110ppi but with 45" would be too low for normal desktop use.
ye, not sure LG is smoking with this one. I agree with you.

also, read my signature, and rejoice!
Posted on Reply
#46
Hxx
Solidstate89There's already a 34" OLED monitor out there at the exact same resolution. Why would I want the same resolution on a bigger screen? Again, worthless.
The dell is also not a good choice for mixed use because weird sub pixel layout and compromises due to them using the nvidia gsync module. This panel from lg would have been a better choice at 34 inch . At 45 inch you’re dealing with low pixel density which again will suck for anything else but gaming and provided u have the space for it. If lg brings this down to a 34 inch display then awesome but I guess not yet
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 16th, 2024 08:13 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts