Friday, June 27th 2025

LG Display Begins Mass Production of Ultimate Gaming OLED Panel with 4th-Generation OLED Technology

LG Display, the world's leading innovator of display technologies, announced today that it has successfully begun mass production of the world's top OLED monitor panel, incorporating its latest proprietary technology as the company accelerates its push into the premium monitor panel market. The 27-inch OLED monitor panel achieves a peak brightness of 1,500 nits thanks to the application of the company's core fourth-generation OLED technology, Primary RGB Tandem.

In addition, LG Display has successfully developed a 540 Hz OLED monitor panel - surpassing the highest refresh rate currently available - and plans to unveil it soon. As a result, LG Display is leading the world's OLED technology across the "triple crown" of key elements that determine gaming monitor picture quality - brightness, refresh rate, and response time.
By incorporating its proprietary Primary RGB Tandem technology, LG Display's 27-inch OLED monitor panel delivers the highest peak brightness among existing OLED monitors - 1,500 nits (based on APL 1.5%) and a refresh rate of 280 Hz. This technology is the world's first to stack the three primary colors of light - red, green, and blue - into four separate, independent layers. By increasing peak brightness, it maximizes contrast ratio, delivering more vivid and accurate visuals.

The panel also achieves a color reproduction rate of 99.5%, the highest among existing OLEDs and a level that is suitable for professional content creation environments such as film production and color grading.

Moreover, it eliminates screen glare, which significantly impacts the gaming experience, blocking 99% of internal and external light reflections through a special film and improved internal panel element structure. As a result, it maintains perfect picture quality without color distortion even under lighting conditions of 500 lux - the brightness of a living room in broad daylight. This has enabled the panel to obtain certifications for Perfect Black, Perfect Color, and 100% Color Fidelity from global organizations such as UL Solutions and Intertek.

LG Display additionally revealed details of its development of the first OLED monitor panel to simultaneously support a 540 Hz refresh rate and QHD resolution. A 540 Hz refresh rate means the screen refreshes 540 times per second, delivering overwhelming performance in fast-paced games such as first-person shooters (FPS) and racing titles.

Exceeding a 500 Hz refresh rate had been considered a virtually unbreakable threshold due to the associated steep drop in picture quality. LG Display has successfully overcome this limitation by developing and applying a new proprietary algorithm. The 540 Hz refresh rate goes beyond even the highest standards envisioned by professional gamers for OLED gaming monitors.

Meanwhile, LG Display's proprietary Dynamic Frequency & Resolution (DFR) technology enables ultra-high refresh rate modes of up to 720 Hz in HD resolution. DFR allows users to select their preferred refresh rate mode depending on the content.

The company's OLED monitor panels also feature an industry-leading response time of 0.03 ms, far surpassing the performance of LCD monitors, which have a response time of up to 1.0 ms.

Response time refers to how long it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another. Even with a high refresh rate, if the response time is slow, blurred edges or ghosting from previous frames can occur. A fast response time is essential to fully experience the speed of fast-paced games.

LG Display's OLED panel for monitors combines an ultra-fast 0.03 ms response time with a high refresh rate of 540 Hz, meeting the highest tier of the relevant Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) standard - ClearMR (Clear Motion Ratio) 21,000. A higher ClearMR value indicates better picture quality, greater clarity, and reduced motion blur.

With major global set manufacturers having completed launch evaluations, LG Display plans to begin mass production of its 540 Hz Gaming OLED panel in the second half of this year.

"OLED monitors are rapidly expanding their market share thanks to perfect black levels and fast response times - capabilities fundamentally unattainable by LCD monitors," said Hyeon-woo Lee, Head of the Large Display Business Unit at LG Display. "With proprietary technologies like fourth-generation OLED and DFR, which competitors cannot replicate, LG Display will enhance its competitiveness in the premium monitor market and deliver differentiated value to customers."
Source: LG Display
Add your own comment

39 Comments on LG Display Begins Mass Production of Ultimate Gaming OLED Panel with 4th-Generation OLED Technology

#26
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Rightness_1Utter FUD.


Yep, gotta love ARM for bringing the slowest CPU's and GPU's to some of the most expensive items in the household!
It's not ARM lmao.

Same reason you don't criticize NVIDIA for Nintendo choosing to use a downclocked five year old chip on a six year old process with the Switch 2.

ARM has plenty of high performance options available for the segment, the vast majority of TV manufacturers however are plenty happy to increase their profit margin by another 10% or so and install a piece of crap SoC, with 5-10 year old core architecture, connected to the slowest possible memory and eMMC storage they can find.
Posted on Reply
#28
MHD34567
a word about what can do the HDMI and DP cable ? and which version ? ...
Posted on Reply
#29
onemanhitsquad
Got my eye on this ...liking what I see

LG UltraGear 45GX950A (GX9)
Rightness_132" 4K/240Hz 10 bit please LG.
ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM ...everything you mentioned
Posted on Reply
#30
Legacy-ZA
I have my eye on these, apparently, a 38/39" Ultrawide with 360Hz will come out, if all goes well, this is the panel I will get.
Posted on Reply
#31
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Vayra86The overwhelming majority of smart TVs are simply equipped with a slow ass chip, they feel and act like massively underpowered PC or phones really. It reminds me of the Android phone world. Or the average car infotainment from Volkswagen lol.
That was true for the Samsung smart TV we had, but I can't say that this LG TV feels slow. I only have a Fire TV Stick 4K Max (1st gen) to compare with though and that's hardly powerful, but way better than the non Max version that I also had. It was a midrange version when release in 2021, but I was a bit shocked that it only had 2 GB of free storage for apps. However, webOS doesn't seem to have nearly as big apps as Android, so it hasn't proven to be an issue as yet.
Rightness_1Yep, gotta love ARM for bringing the slowest CPU's and GPU's to some of the most expensive items in the household!
Sorry, but how is that Arms fault? Arm license IP, they don't make the chips.
If you want to blame someone, blame the TV makers, as they're the ones deciding what hardware goes into their TVs.
Also, one of the biggest chip makers for TVs is Mediatek, who bough MStar which was their major competitor.
Yes, if you compare with smartphone SoCs, TV SoCs are way behind, as MediaTek's highest-end TV chip are based on the Cortex-A76 cores and the Mali G57 MC3 GPU.
That said, those parts are only for the application processing and not the rest of the stuff that goes on in a TV.
It seems like all of their slower Pentonic parts are Cortex-A73 at least, not A53 or A55.
www.ubergizmo.com/2021/11/mediatek-pentonic-2000-soc-for-next-gen-8k-120hz-smart-tvs/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_MediaTek_systems_on_chips#Pentonic_Series

LG and Samsung make their own chips from what I know.
Posted on Reply
#32
Waldorf
@TheDeeGee
because they dont experience burn in, as they arent plasmas?
image retention you mean?
unfortunately LG isnt the best when it comes to "preventing" it.
at least when they were providing sony with panels (left retail 4 years ago), their (tvs tho) experienced IR within 8-10 month, while the equivalent sony model did not.
Posted on Reply
#33
Vayra86
TheLostSwedeThat was true for the Samsung smart TV we had, but I can't say that this LG TV feels slow. I only have a Fire TV Stick 4K Max (1st gen) to compare with though and that's hardly powerful, but way better than the non Max version that I also had. It was a midrange version when release in 2021, but I was a bit shocked that it only had 2 GB of free storage for apps. However, webOS doesn't seem to have nearly as big apps as Android, so it hasn't proven to be an issue as yet.


Sorry, but how is that Arms fault? Arm license IP, they don't make the chips.
If you want to blame someone, blame the TV makers, as they're the ones deciding what hardware goes into their TVs.
Also, one of the biggest chip makers for TVs is Mediatek, who bough MStar which was their major competitor.
Yes, if you compare with smartphone SoCs, TV SoCs are way behind, as MediaTek's highest-end TV chip are based on the Cortex-A76 cores and the Mali G57 MC3 GPU.
That said, those parts are only for the application processing and not the rest of the stuff that goes on in a TV.
It seems like all of their slower Pentonic parts are Cortex-A73 at least, not A53 or A55.
www.ubergizmo.com/2021/11/mediatek-pentonic-2000-soc-for-next-gen-8k-120hz-smart-tvs/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_MediaTek_systems_on_chips#Pentonic_Series

LG and Samsung make their own chips from what I know.
Connect an Nvidia Shield to your Smart TV and feel the difference between actual responsiveness and your Smart TV. Or just a PC with a low end desktop chip... I mean.. come on. Its like night and day. Its entirely comparable to me opening the door of my VW ID3 and wanting to fire off onto the road within 5 seconds after sitting down, and the whole infotainment still getting to grips with the whole event. Don't even consider trying to connect your phone over bluetooth at that point, no no. And DEFINITELY don't be entering a destination on your navigation because the keyboard will just simply pop up a good 20 seconds after you ask for it ;) Oh yeah, and every letter of your destination will also be having a good 500ms delay before appearing on screen. And yes, that means you will be having wrong inputs all the time. And yes, its absolutely ridiculous considering its 39k EUR car.

I have a brand new LG Evo C4 right now and it still has the odd slowdown. And that's not, far from even, the bottom of Smart TV chip land at all.
Nah... really... we should be expecting much more of this, especially as tech nerds. I mean, Apple figured out how to present its consumers with bottom end chips and still have a good UX (or at least, the chip performance is sufficient to have a consistent experience). Why haven't TVs figured this out? And don't get me wrong - I'm not entirely complaining about the LG TV's performance, it does what it needs to do. But its absolutely just that, and not a smidge more - and occasionally its a tad too little in terms of performance/responsiveness. And that's with a TV not filled to the brim with historical data, yet. It works just okay out of the box. But in due time?
Posted on Reply
#34
The Von Matrices
Vayra86Connect an Nvidia Shield to your Smart TV and feel the difference between actual responsiveness and your Smart TV.
Bad comparison IMO. I have a Shield TV and "responsive" is not a term I would use to describe it. The device is using a 10-year old chip and it definitely feels like it. NVidia desperately needs to refresh it with the chip from the Nintendo Switch 2 (considering the 2015 Shield uses the chip from the Switch 1).
Posted on Reply
#35
Vayra86
The Von MatricesBad comparison IMO. I have a Shield TV and "responsive" is not a term I would use to describe it. The device is using a 10-year old chip and it definitely feels like it. NVidia desperately needs to refresh it with the chip from the Nintendo Switch 2 (considering the 2015 Shield uses the chip from the Switch 1).
Yeah Im old but the shield is too at this point, probably true :)
Posted on Reply
#36
claudio mp
Jesus!! I Just wanted an good contrast ratio whit low bright, 1500nits for me is too much!! Normally I use 600nits whit HDR (the bare minimum),and 300 while browsing , 1500 nits is just unbearable to my Eyes!!
Posted on Reply
#37
Rightness_1
claudio mpJesus!! I Just wanted an good contrast ratio whit low bright, 1500nits for me is too much!! Normally I use 600nits whit HDR (the bare minimum),and 300 while browsing , 1500 nits is just unbearable to my Eyes!!
it's 1500 nits on a 1.5% window. calm down. The average max brightness will be more like 600-900, so it will resemble an OLED HDTV in your living room from 3 years ago. Plus I hear they have this thing called a brightness and contrast control...
Posted on Reply
#38
TheDeeGee
Visible NoiseThis please. And text rendering quality that I can use all day, without VRR flickering.


2010 called to get its burn-in meme back.
It's not a meme, it's still a problem.
Posted on Reply
#39
Rightness_1
TheDeeGeeIt's not a meme, it's still a problem.
Monitors Unboxed has a good video series up, where he is testing an OLED monitor for burn in. I think he has been using the monitor for 18 months now, and it's not a problem.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 23:56 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts