Thursday, July 31st 2025

Intel Adds Three Entry-Level Arrow Lake Processors to Ultra 5 Series 2

Intel has quietly rolled out three new Arrow Lake processors as part of its Ultra 5 lineup, enhancing its entry-level options with the Ultra 5 235A, 235TA, and 235UA models. The Ultra 5 235A and 235TA processors are quite similar, both featuring a total of 14 cores—six of which are performance cores and eight are efficient cores with 14 threads. They can both reach turbo frequencies of 5 GHz on their performance cores, while the efficient cores can go up to 4.4 GHz. The main difference between the two CPUs is the power consumption and base frequencies. The Ultra 5 235A runs at 65 W with its performance cores clocking at a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. The Intel Ultra 5 235TA is designed to be more power-efficient, operating at just 35 W with its performance cores running at a base frequency of 2.2 GHz. Both of these desktop models are built using TSMC's N3B manufacturing process and come equipped with 24 MB of Smart Cache.

Update 19:03 UTC:
The Ultra 5 235UA has an identical device ID to the Ultra 7 265U, a Meteor Lake based CPU that uses Redwood Cove P-Cores and Crestmont E-Cores, thus, the CPU does actually have 12 cores and 14 threads, due to the two P-Cores offering Hyper-Threading, which was removed in Arrow Lake's Lion Cove P-Core design, for security, area efficiency, and performance reasons. This is quite confusing, since the product is marketed as an Arrow Lake "Series 2" CPU, but is actually based on the preceding mobile only Meteor Lake "Series 1" architecture. The only differences between the 235UA/265U and the Meteor Lake 165U is the process node the chip is built on, with the 165U being fabbed on Intel 4, and the 265U/235UA refresh chips being fabbed on Intel 3, which allows for a slight clock speed bump within the same power budget.

The "Series 2," "Arrow Lake" Ultra 5 235UA takes a different route, focusing on ultra-low power applications with a 12-core Core Ultra Series 1 Meteor Lake based design. This mobile processor features two performance cores, eight efficient cores (2.0 GHz Base / 4.9 GHz Max.), and an extra pair of low-power efficient cores (1.6 GHz Base / 4.1 GHz Max. and 700 MHz / 2.4 GHz in low-power mode), allowing it to maintain 12 threads even with fewer total P-Cores. It operates at a mere 15 W base power and can ramp up to a maximum turbo of 57 W. Unlike the others, the 235UA utilizes Intel's own 3 nm process technology instead of TSMC's. All three processors support DDR5 memory and come with integrated graphics, though their performance levels vary. It is expected that all three processors to be available in Q3 2025. The desktop models (Ultra 5 235A and 235TA) are listed on Intel's website with an MSRP of $269.

Interestingly, Intel's own specifications page for the 235UA currently lists the CPU as having 10 cores in the search results, something that is impossible when considering the core count of 12. It seems that copy-pasting the Meteor Lake CPU into a "Series 2, Arrow Lake" model was possible, but copy-pasting the specifications correctly was a little too hard.
Sources: IT Home, Intel
Add your own comment

9 Comments on Intel Adds Three Entry-Level Arrow Lake Processors to Ultra 5 Series 2

#1
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
235UA looks like a nice NAS or self hosting CPU.
Posted on Reply
#2
sudothelinuxwizard
Isn't the 235A basically the 235 with a price hike? Intel Compare shows not a single difference.
Posted on Reply
#4
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
sudothelinuxwizardIsn't the 235A basically the 235 with a price hike? Intel Compare shows not a single difference.
Weirdly, the non K versions, just like the T/A/UA/whatever versions, all seem to have much higher street pricing than the equivalent K versions, not just for ARL, but for previous generations, too. Ironic considering the K models can also be ran with extremely low power limits, I suppose it's just the consequence of binning/less adoption in the consumer market.
Posted on Reply
#5
Nomad76
News Editor
sudothelinuxwizardIsn't the 235A basically the 235 with a price hike? Intel Compare shows not a single difference.
There's "A" difference :D
Posted on Reply
#6
pressing on
The 235UA is one of the series that used to be called Meteor Lake but now confusingly is Core Ultra (Series 2) just like Arrow Lake. That's why the spec includes Hyper-threading on the P cores which Arrow Lake does not have.
Posted on Reply
#7
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
pressing onThe 235UA is one of the series that used to be called Meteor Lake but now confusingly is Core Ultra (Series 2) just like Arrow Lake. That's why the spec includes Hyper-threading on the P cores which Arrow Lake does not have.
You are correct, editing the article

Pretty sure it's just a down binned 265U, since identical device ID.

www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/compare.html?productIds=241859,243859

The 265U is literally just a Meteor Lake 165U built on Intel 3 not Intel 4, the 235UA is just a 265U with lower clocks. Unreal that they're calling this a Series 2 Arrow Lake product.

I was double checking specs because something seemed, off, thought the issue was with the Intel specs page, since they got the core count wrong (10 when should be 12), but turns out they were actually correct about it being a 12C/14T CPU, instead the marketing lie of it being a Series 2 Arrow Lake CPU.

Reminds me of the "Raptor Lake" CPUs that were below the 13/14600 in the product stack (13/14500, 400, 300, 200, 100 all Alder Lake dies).
Posted on Reply
#8
kondamin
dgianstefaniYou are correct, editing the article

Pretty sure it's just a down binned 265U, since identical device ID.

www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/compare.html?productIds=241859,243859

The 265U is literally just a Meteor Lake 165U built on Intel 3 not Intel 4, the 235UA is just a 265U with lower clocks. Unreal that they're calling this a Series 2 Arrow Lake product.

I was double checking specs because something seemed, off, thought the issue was with the Intel specs page, since they got the core count wrong (10 when should be 12), but turns out they were actually correct about it being a 12C/14T CPU, instead the marketing lie of it being a Series 2 Arrow Lake CPU.

Reminds me of the "Raptor Lake" CPUs that were below the 13/14600 in the product stack (13/14500, 400, 300, 200, 100 all Alder Lake dies).
Don’t they know it’s stuff like this that is really damaging the enthousiast consumers trust in them
Posted on Reply
#9
sudothelinuxwizard
kondaminDon’t they know it’s stuff like this that is really damaging the enthousiast consumers trust in them
wtf is the point of selling a 256U as "235UA"
Posted on Reply
Aug 1st, 2025 08:44 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts