Tuesday, September 23rd 2025

Microsoft Claims 90% of Windows-on-Arm Usage Happens on Native Apps

Microsoft has published an interesting data point about the usage model of its Windows-on-Arm (WoA) devices. The company's corporate vice president Mike Adams claims that "The Arm app ecosystem continues to expand, with native Arm versions available for apps representing 90% of total user minutes, thus providing efficient, high-performance experiences across the scenarios that matter most to our customers." The Arm-based software ecosystem has matured to the point where the user experience is primarily occurring on native app builds, rather than relying on an x86-to-Arm translation layer. Microsoft is confident enough in this ecosystem's compatibility that it recommends users with older PCs running Windows 10—which will reach its end-of-life on October 14, 2025—consider transitioning to Arm-based Copilot+ AI PCs.

The company showcased various app use cases, all operating on their native build for Windows 11 on Arm. These include endpoint protection applications, VPN and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) apps, endpoint management tools, productivity and creative apps, as well as social, web, and entertainment applications. Microsoft even made a list of compatible applications, which you can check out here. For consumers, the choice of WoA laptops is limited, but we can expect more announcements from Qualcomm and NVIDIA to kickstart more design wins and shipments of Arm-based processors to the general Windows PC users.
Sources: Windows Central, Microsoft
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Microsoft Claims 90% of Windows-on-Arm Usage Happens on Native Apps

#1
Vayra86
90% of my toilet visits happen on actual toilets.

And 0% of them require Copilot
Posted on Reply
#2
R-T-B
Vayra8690% of my toilet visits happen on actual toilets.
This percentage is worryingly low.
Posted on Reply
#3
_roman_
I do not get it.

100% of my apps are compiled for my cpu flags for years since 2006.

Emulation software may be the only exception like wine, dosbox, ... The emulator is compiled but the binary which is emulated is not native.

I do not see any point anymore in arm. RiscV with an open platform and bootloader or amd64 when it has to be the proprietary route.
Posted on Reply
#4
theouto
90% of usage (which, mind you, may just be people buying a laptop for just web browsing) being native apps does not mean that windows on arm is good, Microsoft, so it's nothing to brag about. And of course you'd recommend people buy copilot+ laptops, they make you more money by making investors see that AI line go up, which means money now please.
R-T-BThis percentage is worryingly low.
We all have those moments when we are walking through the forest, don't we? Surely that's where the missing 10% went, ...right?
Posted on Reply
#5
b1k3rdude
Vayra8690% of my toilet visits happen on actual toilets.

And 0% of them require Copilot
LOL, excellent..
Posted on Reply
#6
human_error
I'd speculate that 90% of consumer and working from home usage will be web browsers and basic office productivity apps, so this figure is quite misleading as that'll be say four web browsers and two office suites needing to be compiled for ARM? Hardly a large number of applications needing native support to get to this figure. Also, is it counting an application open but in the background towards those "user minutes" (as web browsers will almost always be open in the background)? Or only applications with focus and interaction?

Microsoft are desparate to address the large concerns of poor performance and incompatibility for windows on ARM with this.

All of that telemetry and tracking data is paying off for Microsoft.
Posted on Reply
#7
Aleksandar_038
Windows development is dead anyway... ARM will just speed up this process....
Posted on Reply
#8
Darmok N Jalad
Vayra8690% of my toilet visits happen on actual toilets.

And 0% of them require Copilot
Looking at your Avatar, I kinda wonder where that other 10% happens.
Posted on Reply
#9
Dragonsmonk
R-T-BThis percentage is worryingly low.
urinals are technically no toilet
:p
Posted on Reply
#10
GenericUsername2001
Obviously there is going to be some selection bias here; people that regularly run programs that don't have a native ARM version probably aren't going to be buying a Windows on ARM device in the first place. The only people buying WoA devices (and not returning them, lots of reports from retailers of WoA devices having high return rates) are those who know they will be using ARM native apps most of the time.
Posted on Reply
#11
Nostras
GenericUsername2001Obviously there is going to be some selection bias here; people that regularly run programs that don't have a native ARM version probably aren't going to be buying a Windows on ARM device in the first place. The only people buying WoA devices (and not returning them, lots of reports from retailers of WoA devices having high return rates) are those who know they will be using ARM native apps most of the time.
This is my thought as well. I'm not saying Microsoft is lying, but they're trying to push a certain narrative here that puts them in a positive light.
"See, Windows on ARM is useful for the populace!"
But there's a very important elephant in the room that Microsoft attempts to dodge here.
Posted on Reply
#12
Darmok N Jalad
It’s the same old story with Windows. It’s an uneasy truce we have with MS—we need Windows, and they need us. What WOA misses is the very thing we have come to expect from Windows, and that’s high compatibility in not just hardware, but software. Once you get to a place where 90% is the goal, now the user can look at alternatives. Linux meets that for me, and MacOS exceeds that. Now Windows must stand on its own merits, and it does not (for me). It’s like when MS compares Surface to iPad or Mac. The stats might be accurate, but the comparison misses the mark since the overlap of users is so minimal.

Related, copilot just appeared on my work PC taskbar this morning.
Posted on Reply
#13
R-T-B
Dragonsmonkurinals are technically no toilet
:p
But he specifically said "toilet visits."

Is this guy just walking into the stall, looking the toilet square in the eye, and only hitting 90% of the time?

...Actually given some mens uh... streams, this may add up.
Posted on Reply
#14
Vayra86
R-T-BBut he specifically said "toilet visits."

Is this guy just walking into the stall, looking the toilet square in the eye, and only hitting 90% of the time?

...Actually given some mens uh... streams, this may add up.
Sometimes, ignorance is bliss :roll:
Posted on Reply
#15
JohH
How did they get this usage metric? User minutes.
:)
Windows is spying. Microsoft is spying. And they're selling this information.
Posted on Reply
#16
Craptacular
Vayra8690% of my toilet visits happen on actual toilets.

And 0% of them require Copilot
Women would disagree considering how much you pee on the seat and around the toliet.
Posted on Reply
#17
close
97% of people who filled our survey said they love to fill surveys.

I bet 90% of what a user of a Windows on ARM device does on that device happens in the browser. The companies who buy these devices expect the users will use them with Teams, Office, and the M365 stuff which runs on anything (also in the browser). MS themselves have a lot of these devices, probably enough to skew the statistic even.

In their "what works where" site they proudly list 1600 games but when you filter for playable/perfect you end up with 120ish. And at least one random app that I searched for which is marked as "Compatible" has an atrocious performance on the top end ARM device on which I saw it being tested.

So 90% browser and 10% "technically compatible but the lawyers told us to not say more".
Posted on Reply
#18
Vayra86
CraptacularWomen would disagree considering how much you pee on the seat and around the toliet.
Are you suggesting men use Copilot to help them, I wonder...
Dragonsmonkurinals are technically no toilet
:p
Thanks for saving me from that comment lol
Posted on Reply
#19
cvaldes
Unsurprising.

The vast majority of Windows-on-ARM devices are corporate/work issued devices, so people are using them for the standard productivity tasks: e-mail, web browser, office suite, etc. If there are other tools required by the company to do the job, the IT department has qualified those applications to run on these systems.
Posted on Reply
#20
ZoneDymo
what is this "windows 11 on arm" they are talking about??
I can understand installing MS apps like word on an arm based device...but as far as I know you cannot install windows 11 on just about any arm based device, its all Android.
Posted on Reply
#21
Darmok N Jalad
JohHHow did they get this usage metric? User minutes.
:)
Windows is spying. Microsoft is spying. And they're selling this information.
It’s technically not spying since you agreed to it, right? Right?

Yeah, I have no doubt the tracking in W11 and apps like Office and Teams is very much aimed at the corporate overlord. Why manage people personally when you can get the usage metrics reports from MS and determine who is working, how much, and from where? I don’t doubt all those things are possible and happening. I used to get emails (that would light up my phone at 4AM) from MS on who I “collaborated most with,” so you know the tracking runs deep.
Posted on Reply
#22
Aleksandar_038
Darmok N JaladIt’s technically not spying since you agreed to it, right? Right?

Yeah, I have no doubt the tracking in W11 and apps like Office and Teams is very much aimed at the corporate overlord. Why manage people personally when you can get the usage metrics reports from MS and determine who is working, how much, and from where? I don’t doubt all those things are possible and happening. I used to get emails (that would light up my phone at 4AM) from MS on who I “collaborated most with,” so you know the tracking runs deep.
Well, it is the same regardless of software used. Google track you (and Google Business Suites tracks you even more extensively), and some suites made a name thanks to their precise "time" tracking of users (Confluence comes to mind).

If we talk about that subject, one giant reset is needed anyway.
close97% of people who filled our survey said they love to fill surveys.

I bet 90% of what a user of a Windows on ARM device does on that device happens in the browser. The companies who buy these devices expect the users will use them with Teams, Office, and the M365 stuff which runs on anything (also in the browser). MS themselves have a lot of these devices, probably enough to skew the statistic even.

In their "what works where" site they proudly list 1600 games but when you filter for playable/perfect you end up with 120ish. And at least one random app that I searched for which is marked as "Compatible" has an atrocious performance on the top end ARM device on which I saw it being tested.

So 90% browser and 10% "technically compatible but the lawyers told us to not say more".
Exactly. But Microsoft is fine with dooming Windows existence and moving to browser / cloud. They basically migrated all their key offerings to fully cloud and browser-first platform, Windows is relic on life support.

And I think we can all agree it will end badly for Microsoft long-term. Yet, shareholders are now happy, and that is only thing that matters...
Posted on Reply
#23
cvaldes
WoA is just Microsoft’s interim solution to stretch their relevance until general computing is done on thin clients connected to the cloud. Apart from gaming and some increasingly niche cases, we’re probably looking at 2030.

Microsoft basically lost relevance as a consumer platform when they fumbled away and ultimately exited the smartphone market. Smartphones have been the primary driver of consumer technology innovation for over ten years and Microsoft is just a sideline spectator today.

Personal computers are the old paradigm.

Their best hope is to maintain some consumer relevance via Xbox but the truth is in 15-20 years they will just be the cloud IT dweeb for the enterprise world. Joe Consumer might still be tapping on some on some Microsoft device but their attention will mostly revolve around their phone connected some AI cloud compute service.

Microsoft will soon just be enterprise’s IT department in the cloud.
Posted on Reply
#24
R-T-B
JohHHow did they get this usage metric? User minutes.
:)
Windows is spying. Microsoft is spying.
That's literally stated in the EULA. In other news water is wet.
And they're selling this information.
I mean probably, but we haven't proven that part... at least not yet.
Posted on Reply
#25
Dr_b_
Microsoft also claims that 90% of people actually enjoy having telemetry and find it useful for everyday tasks
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 02:04 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts