Friday, November 28th 2025

Intel Could Manufacture Apple M-Series Chips in 2027 with 18A-P Node

According to one of the analysts closest to the Apple supply chain, Ming-Chi Kuo, Intel is expected to manufacture Apple's advanced M-series of chips by 2027. According to Kuo, Apple has used version 0.9.1 of process design kit (PDK) designed for Intel 18AP node. With performance, density, power, and every other metric going according to plan, Intel could become Apple's source of advanced node production in 2027. Additionally, Apple is reportedly waiting for Intel to release 18AP PDK version 1.0 or 1.1, which is scheduled for Q1 of 2026. When that gets released, Apple will start with lowest-end M-series chip, used by MacBook Air and iPad Pro devices.

Interestingly, Intel expected customers to adopt more of the refined 18A nodes—like 18A-P and 18A-PT—and later 14A nodes, than its current vanilla 18A. The 18A-P node enhances Intel's 18A by incorporating RibbonFET and PowerVia technologies, which offer better performance and energy efficiency. Compared to the regular 18A node, these improvements include newly designed low-threshold voltage components, optimized elements to reduce leakage, and refined ribbon width specifications, all aimed at boosting performance-per-watt metrics. Apple's designs are very similar to Intel's "Lunar Lake," which includes compute and memory on a single package. This is made using the "Foveros" advanced packaging, which we covered here.
Intel-made Apple SoC
Apple is reportedly waiting to see how the final version of PDK 1.0 for the 18A-P performs before starting production. This could mean that volume production might begin by the end of 2026, with Apple expected to ship these Intel-made SoCs as early as the second or third quarter of 2027. With solid yield improvements, advanced packaging, and a promising outlook for the 14A node, Intel is becoming an increasingly attractive option for third parties. As Intel Foundry aims to break even in 2027, securing large clients like Apple definitely strengthens its position.
Source: Ming-Chi Kuo
Add your own comment

9 Comments on Intel Could Manufacture Apple M-Series Chips in 2027 with 18A-P Node

#1
Six_Times
Looks like Pat Gelsinger was correct after all.
Posted on Reply
#2
kondamin
Six_TimesLooks like Pat Gelsinger was correct after all.
To bad he took on to much debt to build fabs before he had a working node.
Posted on Reply
#3
bonehead123
kondaminTo bad he took on to much debt to build fabs before he had a working node.
Yea, but if he hadn't done that, he would not have been able to buy all those Lear Jets, Beach houses in south america, and oh yea, don't forget those late-night "executive assistant visits", not to mention his golden parachute package :D
Posted on Reply
#4
londiste
Interestingly, Intel expected customers to adopt more of the refined 18A nodes—like 18A-P and 18A-PT—and later 14A nodes, than its current vanilla 18A. The 18A-P node enhances Intel's 18A by incorporating RibbonFET and PowerVia technologies, which offer better performance and energy efficiency. Compared to the regular 18A node, these improvements include newly designed low-threshold voltage components, optimized elements to reduce leakage, and refined ribbon width specifications, all aimed at boosting performance-per-watt metrics.
I would put this more down to simple timing. 18A-P is slated for next year - if they find a customer with the time it takes to start manufacturing 18A-P is there and has superceded regular 18A. 14A I think is on the roadmap a year later and 18A-PT another year later but the idea is the same. Not discounting additional things like PowerVia and PowerDirect here but I would put these are more secondary factors.
Posted on Reply
#5
95Viper
Thread needs to get back on topic.
And, if anyone has a question on a moderator's action/decision... then. follow the Guideline for this"
If you disagree with moderator actions contact them via PM, if you can't solve the issue with the moderator in question contact a super moderator.
Under no circumstances should you start public drama.
Anymore off topic comments/questions will be met with thread bans or other actions.
Posted on Reply
#6
kondamin
bonehead123Yea, but if he hadn't done that, he would not have been able to buy all those Lear Jets, Beach houses in south america, and oh yea, don't forget those late-night "executive assistant visits", not to mention his golden parachute package :D
First I hear about that, i was under the impression he was a pretty straightforward honest man.
His predecessor was abut more problematic if I remember correctly.
Posted on Reply
#7
Ahhzz
The Wizard thereof
kondaminFirst I hear about that, i was under the impression he was a pretty straightforward honest man.
His predecessor was abut more problematic if I remember correctly.
@bonehead123 @kondamin

Original. Topic. This isn't it.
Posted on Reply
#8
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
I wonder if this actually means that Intel's fabs are competitive enough with TSMC to be a viable alternative for Apple. They wouldn't make this sort of switch if it didn't give Apple an advantage in some way. I can't imagine that Apple would take a step backwards just because of TSMC's fab capacity.
Posted on Reply
#9
kondamin
AquinusI wonder if this actually means that Intel's fabs are competitive enough with TSMC to be a viable alternative for Apple. They wouldn't make this sort of switch if it didn't give Apple an advantage in some way. I can't imagine that Apple would take a step backwards just because of TSMC's fab capacity.
Or it's just one of these rumours that don't pan out, as i wrote in my first post tsmc and apple have a good relationship.
Intel and Apple isn't as rosy.
Posted on Reply
Nov 14th, 2026 18:53 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts