Friday, November 28th 2025
Valve Steam Machine May Cost Less Than Anticipated
Valve recently sparked concern among gamers when it revealed that the Steam Machine would be priced similarly to a competitive gaming PC, with ensuing speculation resulting in up to $1,000 prices being thrown around. Likely in response to many of these concerns, Linus Tech Tips on YouTube took it upon himself to build a gaming PC with similar specifications and performance to the upcoming Steam Machine in an attempt to estimate the price of the new living room console. The build itself consists of an AMD Ryzen 8400F, an ASRock B650M motherboard, 16 GB of Crucial DDR5-5600 memory, a Kingston 500 GB SSD, a Seasonic 550 W PSU, and an ASRock AMD Radeon RX 6600 GPU. Taking the build's cost at face value, at the time the PC was built, and with the lowest available prices, the Steam Machine will launch at somewhere around $910, with the possibility of bringing the price down by cutting certain features.
However, Valve is not a regular consumer, and economies of scale play a big role in pricing when you start talking about devices that are expected to sell hundreds of thousands or millions of units. Valve also previously said that the pricing for the entry-level Steam Deck was "painful," suggesting that it had employed very aggressive pricing for that device. At Valve's scale, it seems likely that the specific components that the YouTuber used in the build would come to around $700-750, but when accounting for the semi-custom nature of the Steam Machine and adjusting for the potential savings that Valve gets from its direct-to-consumer model, it seems like the Steam Machine cost as little as $600-650 in hardware. Accounting for Valve's assumed profit of around 10% and taking into account Valve's comments to Linus about its hardware business aiming for sustainability, the official pricing guess comes out to $699.99. This price estimate isn't incredibly reliable, since it doesn't account for the current DRAM shortage that has resulted in prices skyrocketing across the board, which will certainly affect Valve when the Steam Machine launches, and it assumes Valve will sell the Steam Machine at a high profit margin..
Source:
Linus Tech Tips on YouTube
However, Valve is not a regular consumer, and economies of scale play a big role in pricing when you start talking about devices that are expected to sell hundreds of thousands or millions of units. Valve also previously said that the pricing for the entry-level Steam Deck was "painful," suggesting that it had employed very aggressive pricing for that device. At Valve's scale, it seems likely that the specific components that the YouTuber used in the build would come to around $700-750, but when accounting for the semi-custom nature of the Steam Machine and adjusting for the potential savings that Valve gets from its direct-to-consumer model, it seems like the Steam Machine cost as little as $600-650 in hardware. Accounting for Valve's assumed profit of around 10% and taking into account Valve's comments to Linus about its hardware business aiming for sustainability, the official pricing guess comes out to $699.99. This price estimate isn't incredibly reliable, since it doesn't account for the current DRAM shortage that has resulted in prices skyrocketing across the board, which will certainly affect Valve when the Steam Machine launches, and it assumes Valve will sell the Steam Machine at a high profit margin..



118 Comments on Valve Steam Machine May Cost Less Than Anticipated
EDIT : after making a sanity check, the 8700G & 8600G are full Zen4 cores, respectively x8 & x6, the 8500G & 8300G are Zen4/4c mix, respectively x2+x4 & x1+x3
interesting, I did not know about thatThere is no such thing as an 8400G, they have 83/85/86/8700G but only an 8400F (and an 8440U)
it cannot be a cut down 8000G APU either because those get at the very most a 780M and they only get x12 RDNA3 CUs, it can't be a cutdown since Valve said the Machine gets x28 CUs
www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-8500g/2.html
With most of the cache ripped out
lower clocks and no the ipc isnt the same as it has less cache
its the same as a standard core with cache disabled but not one with full cache
You know what intel called that? a Celeron
e.g. its cut down
my god you people
this is a cut down 8500G as its missing 2 non C cores so god knows what else is cut
a Standard Desktop part has 32MB
Please, stop being thick, and just read the article I posted, will ya? :)
As my university profs always said: Wikipedia is not a source.
"even the L1 and L2 cache is the same"
"reduced L3 cache per core"
Do you see the difference between these two statements and how it contradicts "Zen 4c has the same cache"?
The 8700G has 8 Zen 4 cores and 16 MB L3.
The 8500G has 2 Zen 4 and 4 Zen 4c cores and 16 MB L3.
How is this reduced?
It's also worth noting that the L3 cache is not part of the cores. It is a separate entity shared among the cores.
Like I said, the 8700G has only full fat Zen 4 cores, but the same 16 MB L3. It's not semantics. It's the design of the CPU, not the Zen 4c core.
There are no Zen 4c cores with 4 MB of L3 cache per core. Therefore, Zen 4c cores have less cache. This is fairly obvious if you're not trying to play word games.
Ryzen 5 8540 & 220 are the most cost-reduced with a disabled AI NPU.
MLID calculated costs using silicon size * yield rate, etc. Costs come out in the range of USD $300 - 425. Total for the whole box.
Literally only RAM & NVMe drive costs have sky rocketted.
Linus is on the extreme low end of value in the field of speculation compared to leakers, insiders, and professionals.
Let's say you're running a single threaded load on your 8700G and a Zen 4 core, and the same single threaded load on an 8500G and its Zen 4c core. Doesn't your workload have the same 16 MB L3 cache to work with on both CPUs? And if you match the clock speed, too, will it not get done in the same amount of time?
L3 cache is not allocated per core. It is shared among all cores. That fact does matter, especially when making stupid statements like "Zen 4c is a cut-down core".
Excess cache makes X3D chips faster, a lack of cache, amongst other things, makes Zen 4c chips slower, and "cut down". AMD marketing claims about "IPC" being identical assumes the cores are fed, a core that has access to literally half the L3 cache isn't fed as well as a core that has the normal 4 MB per core, therefore IPC is not identical because Zen 4c cores aren't as well fed as Zen 4 cores, even if the rest of the core has the same specifications.So does the c core that has half the shared cache available as the non-c core have the same amount of cache AusWolf?
Zen 4c is literally a cut down core specifically designed to reduce die area and therefore cost. This is a classic example of you stubbornly dying on a hill that has little technical merit.