Friday, November 28th 2025
Valve Steam Machine May Cost Less Than Anticipated
Valve recently sparked concern among gamers when it revealed that the Steam Machine would be priced similarly to a competitive gaming PC, with ensuing speculation resulting in up to $1,000 prices being thrown around. Likely in response to many of these concerns, Linus Tech Tips on YouTube took it upon himself to build a gaming PC with similar specifications and performance to the upcoming Steam Machine in an attempt to estimate the price of the new living room console. The build itself consists of an AMD Ryzen 8400F, an ASRock B650M motherboard, 16 GB of Crucial DDR5-5600 memory, a Kingston 500 GB SSD, a Seasonic 550 W PSU, and an ASRock AMD Radeon RX 6600 GPU. Taking the build's cost at face value, at the time the PC was built, and with the lowest available prices, the Steam Machine will launch at somewhere around $910, with the possibility of bringing the price down by cutting certain features.
However, Valve is not a regular consumer, and economies of scale play a big role in pricing when you start talking about devices that are expected to sell hundreds of thousands or millions of units. Valve also previously said that the pricing for the entry-level Steam Deck was "painful," suggesting that it had employed very aggressive pricing for that device. At Valve's scale, it seems likely that the specific components that the YouTuber used in the build would come to around $700-750, but when accounting for the semi-custom nature of the Steam Machine and adjusting for the potential savings that Valve gets from its direct-to-consumer model, it seems like the Steam Machine cost as little as $600-650 in hardware. Accounting for Valve's assumed profit of around 10% and taking into account Valve's comments to Linus about its hardware business aiming for sustainability, the official pricing guess comes out to $699.99. This price estimate isn't incredibly reliable, since it doesn't account for the current DRAM shortage that has resulted in prices skyrocketing across the board, which will certainly affect Valve when the Steam Machine launches, and it assumes Valve will sell the Steam Machine at a high profit margin..
Source:
Linus Tech Tips on YouTube
However, Valve is not a regular consumer, and economies of scale play a big role in pricing when you start talking about devices that are expected to sell hundreds of thousands or millions of units. Valve also previously said that the pricing for the entry-level Steam Deck was "painful," suggesting that it had employed very aggressive pricing for that device. At Valve's scale, it seems likely that the specific components that the YouTuber used in the build would come to around $700-750, but when accounting for the semi-custom nature of the Steam Machine and adjusting for the potential savings that Valve gets from its direct-to-consumer model, it seems like the Steam Machine cost as little as $600-650 in hardware. Accounting for Valve's assumed profit of around 10% and taking into account Valve's comments to Linus about its hardware business aiming for sustainability, the official pricing guess comes out to $699.99. This price estimate isn't incredibly reliable, since it doesn't account for the current DRAM shortage that has resulted in prices skyrocketing across the board, which will certainly affect Valve when the Steam Machine launches, and it assumes Valve will sell the Steam Machine at a high profit margin..



118 Comments on Valve Steam Machine May Cost Less Than Anticipated
I sure hope you can take away it's meaning without further confusion.
Chips and Cheese have a nicely summarized overview that might help you to understand.
A smaller L3 will result in a lower hitrate, which in turn creates more memory traffic. Servers already have less memory bandwidth per core than client CPUs do. Bergamo pushes core counts even higher but uses the same 768-bit DDR5 memory configuration as Genoa. To really shine, Bergamo will need programs that don’t suffer a lot of misses with a 16 MB L3. In the other direction, lower clock speeds should lower per-core bandwidth demands because there’s less compute power to feed.
Now please tell me what functional component does a Zen 4c core have less of compared to Zen 4. Or do you have trouble defining what a core is?
In other words, please compare the 8600G and the 8500G.
Valve is happy to sell you one paired with some other slow hardware, likely for more than it's worth.
Edit: With that logic, the 8700G, or even the 7950X has less cache than my 7950X3D, so that means that Zen 4 has less cache than um... Zen 4? :laugh:
Imagine this:
The Zen 4 core has a front-end, an execution engine, and L1 and L2 caches.
The Zen4c core is a shrunk (spatially condensed) form of Zen 4 that runs on lower frequencies because of its higher density, but is identical to Zen 4 in its components.
The L3 cache is a separate entity outside of the Zen 4 or Zen 4c cores that all cores on the CPU or CCD share. No Zen 4 or Zen 4c core has any L3 cache on its own.
This is a Phoenix 2 (R5 8500G) block diagram to help you visualise it:
Note that the L3 cache is separate from both Zen 4 and Zen 4c cores, and is accessible in its entirety to either or all of them.
Here is a Zen 4 core:
Note that it doesn't have any L3 cache. Like I said, the L3 belongs to the CPU or CCD as a whole, not to the individual cores.
The Zen 4c core has exactly the same components shrunk to a smaller area with less "space" between them.
Intel P and E cores are built on different architectures with different instruction sets. That's why they require special (software) scheduling. You can't run every instruction on every core.
Meanwhile, Zen 4 and Zen 4c are the same architecture with the same instruction set, just 4c comes in a condensed form and lower clock speed.
the ipc is only identical if everything fits in the cache
which is doesnt alot of the time
hence why x3d is so much faster than a standard zen4 part
the same goes from a zen4c to zen4
also P cores and E cores of intel any instruction set that the e core doesnt do was disabled on the p cores
so yes they are 100% able to operate on both e and p cores