Wednesday, August 5th 2026

Apple Scrambles for DRAM, CXMT Reportedly Rejects Negotiations

Apple is one of the largest supply chain operators in the world, maintaining a vast network of suppliers and manufacturing capacity. However, even a company of its stature is struggling amid the current DRAM shortage. According to Tim Culpan's Culpium newsletter, Apple is scrambling to secure DRAM just weeks before its annual iPhone update cycle. With less than six weeks until the launch of the iPhone 18 series and the iPhone Ultra, assemblers are rushing to place DRAM orders to secure new supplies. The Cupertino-based giant primarily relies on DRAM from Micron, whose LPDDR5X memory is used in a range of devices and is the main source for the next-generation iPhone. SK hynix and Samsung are also suppliers, but Micron remains the primary choice.

Interestingly, another report has surfaced about Apple's efforts to secure more DRAM. The company has reportedly entered negotiations with Chinese memory giant CXMT for LPDDR5X memory needed for its current product lineup. Apple attempted to negotiate better pricing with CXMT, likely due to the volume it plans to purchase, but CXMT rejected the proposed lower price. This is one of the first instances where negotiation power lies with the suppliers, as CXMT is producing one of the world's most in-demand commodities and is offering it at market rates without discounts.
Chinese companies, including hyperscalers, neo clouds, and AI labs, are buying up all the available DRAM that CXMT is manufacturing. As a result, any output CXMT could provide to Apple is already reserved for Chinese customers willing to pay the current market price, rather than seeking discounts. As DRAM becomes even scarcer next year, this leverage in the supply chain is likely to increase in favor of DRAM manufacturers. It remains unclear whether Apple has accepted these regular market prices.
Sources: Culpium, DDaily
Add your own comment

45 Comments on Apple Scrambles for DRAM, CXMT Reportedly Rejects Negotiations

#2
windwhirl
AleksandarKApple is scrambling to secure DRAM just weeks before its annual iPhone update cycle.
I'd have thought they'd have secured it months ago, considering they're far more aware of how things move in the industry than, say, me. They would have known this "crisis" isn't gonna get resolved any time soon.
Posted on Reply
#3
sudothelinuxwizard
Apple getting desperate isn't something I ever expected to happen.
Posted on Reply
#4
Denver
They should have bought one of Micron's factories to create custom RAM.
Posted on Reply
#5
SnoutBaron
sudothelinuxwizardApple getting desperate isn't something I ever expected to happen.
Amazing profile pic btw.
Posted on Reply
#6
A Computer Guy
Does this mean they are going to have to cancel the iCoffen again?
Posted on Reply
#7
dinmaster
They have the money, create a fab and license one of the memory manufactures to make ram at said fab.
Posted on Reply
#8
Hecate91
Apple should have enough money to buy or build their own fab, or go to Intel and have them manufacture DRAM.
Posted on Reply
#9
Krit
sudothelinuxwizardApple getting desperate isn't something I ever expected to happen.
Sucker Punch from behind not only regular people are suffering from it. Company who most people will support.

Posted on Reply
#10
shuffy_losys
The problem with Apple building their own fab is even if they could, it'd still take several years before the first mass tape out.

So, it doesn't really solve the problem now.
Posted on Reply
#11
_roman_
Was it not that an applie smartphone costs 50€ and was sold for 2000€, sometimes only 1200€. So apple did not source core components?

Why do i see on a daily basis a news about apple, a small company which makes niche smartphones and niche computer hardware. In the high price segment but with very low usage numbers.

they should not destroy old devices but source those components from those. apple has plenty of old DRAM lying around.
Posted on Reply
#12
Aleksandar_038
Well, if Apple with ample resources is "scrambling", most of others are doomed.
Posted on Reply
#13
cvaldes
shuffy_losysThe problem with Apple building their own fab is even if they could, it'd still take several years before the first mass tape out.

So, it doesn't really solve the problem now.
And that's if they had decades of solid experience running foundries on cutting edge nodes.

You cannot just wave a magic wand to conjure up competency. "Fake it until you make it" isn't a real world strategy.

Apple can only hope that RAM manufacturers (Samsung, SK hynix, Micron supply 90% of the world's DRAM) are willing to increase production. A new foundry is $10+ billion these days and requires years to bring online. That's when the operator knows exactly what they are doing.

And the semiconductor industry is notoriously risk averse. Who wants to idle a $10B foundry if an oversupply condition arises?

For sure the RAMpocalyse is going to get worse over the next few years. No one has a crystal ball that will predict when the supply-demand balance will plateau. Apple can't just sell nothing for five years.

My hunch is that the RAMpocalyse will drive many smaller manufacturers towards failure, particularly those servicing the low end of the consumer market.
Posted on Reply
#14
freeagent
Good thing I got a new phone already, seems like things are about to assplode in price.
Posted on Reply
#15
Darmok N Jalad
There is a difference between not sourcing enough RAM and not getting that RAM at the price you want. I’m sure Apple can secure what it needs, but they are paying more than they want to. CXMT doesn’t want to accept Apple’s desired pricing either, but that doesn’t mean they can’t still be a supplier under different terms.
Posted on Reply
#16
remixedcat
_roman_they should not destroy old devices but source those components from those. apple has plenty of old DRAM lying around.
not really it's unified memory, soldered and cpu bound:
Unified Memory Architecture (UMA) where the RAM chips are placed directly on the processor package right next to the main system-on-a-chip (SoC).
Posted on Reply
#17
Wirko
Darmok N JaladThere is a difference between not sourcing enough RAM and not getting that RAM at the price you want. I’m sure Apple can secure what it needs, but they are paying more than they want to. CXMT doesn’t want to accept Apple’s desired pricing either, but that doesn’t mean they can’t still be a supplier under different terms.
One thing we can be sure of is that both Apple and DRAM manufacturers, all of them, are going to post record revenue and profit next quarter, no matter if the agreed memory price is a little higher or a little lower.
Posted on Reply
#18
TheinsanegamerN
_roman_Was it not that an applie smartphone costs 50€ and was sold for 2000€, sometimes only 1200€. So apple did not source core components?
No. The iPhone 17 pro max cost between $317 to $408 each to produce, depending on SKU, and this was before all these price hikes.

Also, while setting up that red herring, you also need to figure the cost per device for R+D costs of each generation, the cost of 8+ years of software support, and advertising costs, all of which are taking chunks of every iPhone made.
_roman_Why do i see on a daily basis a news about apple, a small company which makes niche smartphones and niche computer hardware. In the high price segment but with very low usage numbers.
Gee, I wonder why you keep seeing news about one of the largest phone makers on earth, tied up with Samsung for the #1 spot. Real difficult question, that one. /S

Better question: why do you click on, read, and comment on apple posts if you don't care for apple?
_roman_they should not destroy old devices but source those components from those. apple has plenty of old DRAM lying around.
That old dram isn't useful on new devices. In case you didn't know, memory specs advance with time.

And that memory is packed on the SoC under the CPU core. Do you have any understanding of how incredibly difficult it would be to recover usable DRAM from that, let alone at any sort of scale?
Posted on Reply
#19
TheEndIsNear
I love this. Apple the innovative slave labor company and memory company destroyers are now not number 1 anymore. Whatever will they do. Can't wait apple was worth more than nvidia last week. That will seem silly in a year or two.
Posted on Reply
#20
Prima.Vera
AleksandarKApple attempted to negotiate better pricing with CXMT, likely due to the volume it plans to purchase, but CXMT rejected the proposed lower price.
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
WirkoOne thing we can be sure of is that both Apple and DRAM manufacturers, all of them, are going to post record revenue and profit next quarter, no matter if the agreed memory price is a little higher or a little lower.
Exactly this. 👏
Posted on Reply
#21
kondamin
TheEndIsNearI love this. Apple the innovative slave labor company and memory company destroyers are now not number 1 anymore. Whatever will they do. Can't wait apple was worth more than nvidia last week. That will seem silly in a year or two.
As Nvidia will sit back lower in the top 30 for companies by market cap and Apple retains its position in the top 3

Loads of companies making their own inferencing hardware and other AI chips.
Apple is a lifestyle brand, the only way they will shed value is if the rest of the world bans American tech
Posted on Reply
#22
R0H1T
windwhirlI'd have thought they'd have secured it months ago, considering they're far more aware of how things move in the industry than, say, me. They would have known this "crisis" isn't gonna get resolved any time soon.
More like they couldn't get them at the price they wanted to! Apple is notorious for being a tough and often times punishing especially to their suppliers & befoe all this AI boom came up they easily had the lowest "component costs" among any (major) electronics manufacturer you can think of. This is one of the reasons why I constantly remind everyone here that even if the DRAM "cartel" is bad IMO Apple is worse :shadedshu:

Apple pays Arm less than 30 cents per chip in royalties, new report says

Because at least with DRAM or NAND, in previous cycles, you could get absolute dirt cheap memory or storage but every RAM/SSD upgrade with Apple still costs you anywhere between 4-10x normal prices!
Posted on Reply
#23
Mack4285
Would be interesting if Apple cannot secure supply, and has to simply pause sales of products, and their stock nose dives. Then at least some direct consequences to others than consumers.
Posted on Reply
#24
Aleksandar_038
Mack4285Would be interesting if Apple cannot secure supply, and has to simply pause sales of products, and their stock nose dives. Then at least some direct consequences to others than consumers.
They are trying to obtain better price, but for sure they will not run out of memory. They will simply raise prices, and people will keep buying - those with more money than common sense (still lot of them around).

Smaller companies will get roasted, though...
Posted on Reply
#25
kondamin
Mack4285Would be interesting if Apple cannot secure supply, and has to simply pause sales of products, and their stock nose dives. Then at least some direct consequences to others than consumers.
If Apple cant get supplies, nothing but old stock and refurbished items would be for sale.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 07:13 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts