Monday, September 21st 2026

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 60-Series Reportedly Slips to 2028, Per New Leak

Kopite7Kimi, a leaker with a strong track record on NVIDIA hardware, says the company's next-generation GeForce RTX 60-series based on the Rubin architecture is a 2028 product. "Unfortunately, GR20x is a product from 2028. That means they have postponed again," the leaker posted on X. Their earlier estimate was the second half of 2027, so this is another "delay," if you can even call it that. NVIDIA hasn't said anything official about RTX 60-series timing, so treat it as a rumor for now.

Interestingly, this new leak seems to align with what prominent leaker Kepler_L2 claimed a few days ago: that Rubin gaming GPUs would only arrive in 2028. It also goes against leaker Moore's Law Is Dead, who said about a week ago that an NVIDIA source told them gaming Rubin was greenlit for the first half of 2027. Two leakers against one doesn't settle anything, and we don't know who is right yet, but the 2028 timing does seem more likely given the current industry conditions. Of course, these plans can change before 2028, as the memory supply situation is currently very volatile, and hardware roadmaps are changing almost on a weekly basis.
As for why Rubin seemingly slipped to 2028, the culprit seems to be what we all expected. Memory and TSMC capacity are stretched thin, and data center hardware makes NVIDIA far more money than GeForce does. Apparently, the RTX 50 Super refresh is also stuck over pricey 3 GB GDDR7 modules. All this likely adds up to a long Blackwell cycle, NVIDIA still may manage to squeeze in the Super launch somewhere in 2027, unless it is canceled outright.
Source: Kopite7Kimi on X
Add your own comment

125 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 60-Series Reportedly Slips to 2028, Per New Leak

#1
dtoxic
2500$ +/- for the 6070TI, same crap connector,same crap power delivery,more wattage...its going to be a blast for pc users.
Posted on Reply
#2
Solid State Brain
NVidia can't make the GPUs significantly faster without making the chips larger (thus more expensive and power-hungry) and memory prices have increased too much. These aren't huge issues in the datacenter sector yet, but home consumers can't spend any more.
Posted on Reply
#3
Krit
It looks like there will not be a new gpus in 2027 so AMD actually have a time/chance to detrown nvidia for TPU most popular gpu of 2027! Right now nvidia has only 7.2% advantage but if they continue to be as cocky with their prices then at some point they will be crushed under pressure.
Posted on Reply
#4
Infy101
Since RTX 60 series is rumored to be produced on TSMC 3nm class process, it may not yet be mature enough to produce large monolithic dies required, unless Nvidia is going multi-die architecture with Rubin.
Posted on Reply
#5
Blazeoptimus
This situation reminds me of the crypto days. When nvidia has production limits, gamers always come last.
Posted on Reply
#6
lambda
KritIt looks like there will not be a new gpus in 2027 so AMD actually have a time/chance to detrown nvidia for TPU most popular gpu of 2027! Right now nvidia has only 7.2% advantage but if they continue to be as cocky with their prices than at some point they will fall.
If rumours are to be believed, AMD also has only a single SKU planned for 2027. It's not the top end card either.
Posted on Reply
#7
_JP_
Who was in a rush to get a new generation of a self-destructing excruciatingly expensive card anyway (if it's not the power connector, it's the chip itself)?
Posted on Reply
#8
Kohl Baas
Solid State BrainNVidia can't make the GPUs significantly faster without making the chips larger (thus more expensive and power-hungry) and memory prices have increased too much. These aren't huge issues in the datacenter sector yet, but home consumers can't spend any more.
Bet! Even in datacenters it is a significant problem for nVidia not to be able to gain any performance without multiplying the number of GPUs. Not to mention pulling megawatt+ worth of heat from a single cabinet.
Posted on Reply
#9
Solid State Brain
BlazeoptimusThis situation reminds me of the crypto days. When nvidia has production limits, gamers always come last.
I think this one is different. It's not merely that production capacity has been gobbled up by large customers (datacenters, etc); technological progress has slowed down significantly too. Even the latest datacenter-class NVidia GPUs are mostly only getting larger and packed with more features, with barely any improvement in terms of actual efficiency (NVidia is "cheating" by highlighting huge gains with FP4 support, but performance relative to the standard FP16/BF16 format hasn't changed much over the past years).
Posted on Reply
#10
xSneak
I'm going to need an upgraded gpu when the 4k 360hz monitors come out next year. 😞
Posted on Reply
#11
Solid State Brain
Kohl BaasBet! Even in datacenters it is a significant problem for nVidia not to be able to gain any performance without multiplying the number of GPUs. Not to mention pulling megawatt+ worth of heat from a single cabinet.
As long as NVidia can promise (somewhat) better GPUs with more and faster memory, datacenters will get them, no matter what.
Since they acquired Groq a while back, I guess they'll eventually start introducing large(r) amounts of SRAM to break current memory bandwidth (+ associated power draw) barriers, but that's still something that needs large clusters for being effective.
Posted on Reply
#12
N/A
xSneakI'm going to need an upgraded gpu when the 4k 360hz monitors come out next year. 😞
Oh boy, for that you need a 6090, which is basically a 5090 with an RTRT upgrade and optical shrink to N3, but it still doesn't deliver significant performance, while simultaneously causing a huge drop in speed.
Posted on Reply
#13
Lycanwolfen
I never thought in a million years it would cost 7 grand for a video card. I bought my car for 6 grand.


Nvidia used to be cool. Now they only taylor to the super rich.

I would bet money the 6090 will be 10 grand min.
Posted on Reply
#14
Krit
LycanwolfenI never thought in a million years it would cost 7 grand for a video card. I bought my car for 6 grand.
There are thousand and one better way's to spent it. To buy that piece of shit for that price is something else reality is it's just a brick as they all.
Posted on Reply
#15
Lycanwolfen
Glad I got my 5080 when i did for 1500.00 today price is over 3 grand.
KritThere are 1000 better way's to spent it. To buy that piece of shit for that price is something else reallity is it's just a brick.
Ya on food, new wheels for my car, gas, anything is better.
Posted on Reply
#16
Chrispy_
50-series for another 18 months kinda sucks. Blackwell as an architecture is great but there are too many GPUs in the lineup that suck:

5050 8GB - Stupid pricing for a massive downgrade over the 5060.
5060Ti 8GB - Stupid VRAM quantity for GPU that is plenty capable of running 1080pRT or 1440pUltra and needing 10GB+ of VRAM. PCIe 8x hurts this even more!
5070 12GB - Ridiculous pricing considering it's only a 12GB card. Why is it $900?!!! The GDDR7 pricing issues shouldn't inflate it by a higher percentage than the 16GB cards.
5080 16GB - Ridiculous pricing at launch, the price hikes haven't helped.
5090 32GB - Even calling this a gaming card at $5000-6000 is an insult.

As you can probably tell, I'm only really a fan of the 5060Ti 16GB and 5070Ti. Neither of them are priced well right now, but at least they aren't short of VRAM and amusingly they offer the least bad performance/$ in Nvidia's stack despite all the prices of GDDR7 products being FUBAR right now.

In hindsight, AMD's choice to stick with GDDR6 with RDNA4 looks like a fortuitous move. The RX 9070XT and 9600XT 16GB are still suffering price hikes, but nowhere near as badly as the Nvidia stuff right now....
Posted on Reply
#17
Vya Domus
Neither Nvidia or AMD are going to make new products for consumers for the time being except for a few SKUs that were in the pipeline already pre-2023, there is no profit incentive anymore. PC gaming or at the very least high end PC gaming is basically dead, even if the AI bubble pops the demand for datacenter GPUs wont really go away. It's hard to see an outcome where high end PC gaming becomes viable again, the only thing that can solve this is increased manufacturing but as long as the margins remain astronomical on datacenter parts that's not going to happen.
Posted on Reply
#18
kazuviking
lambdaIf rumours are to be believed, AMD also has only a single SKU planned for 2027. It's not the top end card either.
And i expect 300W power draw for it as default.
Posted on Reply
#19
Luminescentt
If Team Red doesn't strike right now with AT2 in 2027, they never will.

Having an almost full year where NVIDIA has zero response and AMD is the only new architecture on the market is a once-in-a-decade open goal.
Posted on Reply
#20
Vayra86
Solid State BrainNVidia can't make the GPUs significantly faster without making the chips larger (thus more expensive and power-hungry) and memory prices have increased too much. These aren't huge issues in the datacenter sector yet, but home consumers can't spend any more.
Aww, and all of that while Nvidia itself is promoting a heavily GPU intensive technology called RT. Such a bummer, who could have ever seen this coming.
Vya DomusNeither Nvidia or AMD are going to make new products for consumers for the time being except for a few SKUs that were in the pipeline already pre-2023, there is no profit incentive anymore. PC gaming or at the very least high end PC gaming is basically dead, even if the AI bubble pops the demand for datacenter GPUs wont really go away. It's hard to see an outcome where high end PC gaming becomes viable again, the only thing that can solve this is increased manufacturing but as long as the margins remain astronomical on datacenter parts that's not going to happen.
Ofc not. There is demand, so there is a market. It'll adjust, I'm sure, but it will survive.

They call this kind of figure 'too big to fail', with PC posting, once again, the biggest YoY growth %.
Posted on Reply
#21
kondamin
Solid State BrainNVidia can't make the GPUs significantly faster without making the chips larger (thus more expensive and power-hungry) and memory prices have increased too much. These aren't huge issues in the datacenter sector yet, but home consumers can't spend any more.
nvidia just had 2 generations on 4nm 2nm is significantly denser than 4nm.
So a new chip with the same number of transistors would be significantly smaller
Posted on Reply
#22
Kohl Baas
Vya DomusNeither Nvidia or AMD are going to make new products for consumers for the time being except for a few SKUs that were in the pipeline already pre-2023, there is no profit incentive anymore. PC gaming or at the very least high end PC gaming is basically dead, even if the AI bubble pops the demand for datacenter GPUs wont really go away. It's hard to see an outcome where high end PC gaming becomes viable again, the only thing that can solve this is increased manufacturing but as long as the margins remain astronomical on datacenter parts that's not going to happen.
I'd say it's the opposite. High-end/enhusiast PC gaming is the only thing what remains. Literally garbage they can't sell to compute will end up in the rich gamers' setup. What is dead is the sub 500$ market. Totally and utterly dead. There'll be the 500$+ GPUs (soon to be 1000+) and below that a huge chasm until the first non-heterogenous APU's IGP...
Posted on Reply
#23
Vayra86
Kohl BaasI'd say it's the opposite. High-end/enhusiast PC gaming is the only thing what remains. Literally garbage they can't sell to compute will end up in the rich gamers' setup. What is dead is the sub 500$ market. Totally and utterly dead. There'll be the 500$+ GPUs (soon to be 1000+) and below that a huge chasm until the first non-heterogenous APU's IGP...
This. And eventually, IGPs / APUs do get more powerful (they already are) and its already a proven concept they can be produced at scale with minimal cost.

The question is if we'll be having separate boards in X years, to me, but high end gaming won't be dead before we have those at a very comfortable performance level. Nobody is buying into straight regression, we have to at least have the impression something's improved (upscalers are a nice example of that).
Posted on Reply
#24
chrkeller
The problem, from my view, is I won't spend 1k to 2k, unless the jump is 100-200%, and I have a 4090. Might be waiting a long time. Getting a 30% (making up numbers) bump in performance is fine for a $300-$500 performance.
Posted on Reply
#25
Grimling
AMD, plz give us a 2nm Enthusiast GPU with 48GB of RAM and real 5090 Performance, for like 1000 Bucks!
plz?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts