Tuesday, October 20th 2026

Rumor: NVIDIA RTX 6060 May Be Years Away, and Possibly Slower Than the PS6

Anyone holding out for an affordable next-gen NVIDIA card might have a long wait. Hardware leaker Kepler_L2 claims on NeoGAF that the GeForce RTX 6060 will "launch much later," adding that, based on recent trends, he doubts it will even match the PlayStation 6. He was replying to a forum member who argued the PS6 would compete with the RTX 6060, in the same thread where he claimed the console's RAM and storage alone cost over $680. Kepler didn't give an actual date, and the 2029 figure going around seems to be an extrapolation. Both Kepler and kopite7kimi have placed NVIDIA's Rubin-based RTX 60 series in 2028, and the x60 cards usually trail the flagship by a few months. The RTX 5060 arrived under four months after the RTX 5090, while the RTX 4060 took over eight months to follow the RTX 4090.

With a flagship launch around mid-2028 or later, that could push the RTX 6060 into 2029. That said, the "much later" comment seems to be relative to the PS6, which is reportedly targeting late 2027, so the exact timing is still anyone's guess. Kepler didn't say why, but the ongoing memory shortage looks like the obvious suspect. NVIDIA reportedly postponed its RTX 50 SUPER refresh earlier this year to prioritize AI products that use the same GDDR7 memory, and the company recently admitted that RTX 5090 supply is tight. Of course, NVIDIA hasn't announced the RTX 60 series officially yet, so treat this as a rumor. Anyone looking to buy a new NVIDIA GPU should probably expect the current RTX 50 lineup to stick around for quite a while.
Source: Kepler_L2 on NeoGAF
Add your own comment

57 Comments on Rumor: NVIDIA RTX 6060 May Be Years Away, and Possibly Slower Than the PS6

#1
Chrispy_
Nvidia DGAF about consumers any more. Their AI circular investment bros are paying 100x more for everything.

If you haven't already done so, get a decent card that plays today's games and call it a day. Progress in graphics is going to slow right down because everyone is hellbent on throwing 110% of their available resources into AI slop that you have to rent from their cloud.
Posted on Reply
#2
wolf
Better Than Native
Hmm maybe I can get a few out of the way so that a conversation can actually start with them already said.

6060 = 5090 (with MFG 20x! no wait... 50x!)
DLSS6
3.5GB of VRAM with RTX Neural Texture Hair Compression Rendering Resolution
The more you buy, the more you save!
Leather Jacket?!!!111!1!


If the whole series is nowhere in sight till late 2027 or 2028, and the whole comment is at best a fairly accurate leakers opinion. What a time to be alive.
Posted on Reply
#3
Hecate91
And I assume it'll still have 8gb of vram, maybe 10gb if the jacket man feels generous.
I wouldn't mind GPU's launching every 3-4 years, but cards across the stack need sufficient vram, need to be more than 10% uplifts than the previous gen in raw performance, it would also require AAA game companies to optimize the UE5 slop instead of forcing upscaling and AI frames.
Posted on Reply
#6
TheinsanegamerN
Chrispy_Nvidia DGAF about consumers any more. Their AI circular investment bros are paying 100x more for everything.

If you haven't already done so, get a decent card that plays today's games and call it a day. Progress in graphics is going to slow right down because everyone is hellbent on throwing 110% of their available resources into AI slop that you have to rent from their cloud.
Nvidia doesn't care about consumers because *checks notes* low end cards exist.

That is some competitive level virtue signalling.
Posted on Reply
#7
Grimling
Nvidia will "upgrade" from 5 nm TSMC process, to 6 nm Global Foundries process, because bigger numbers = BETTER!
Posted on Reply
#8
JustBenching
Whoever has a card already is blessed. Games are super optimized nowadays anyways so low end xx60 cards can play everything just fine.
Posted on Reply
#9
kazuviking
wolf3.5GB of VRAM with RTX Neural Texture Hair Compression Rendering Resolution
Neural Texture Compression is the future tho.
Posted on Reply
#10
Grimling
JustBenchingWhoever has a card already is blessed. Games are super optimized nowadays anyways so low end xx60 cards can play everything just fine.
Especially those that are made with UE5!
They really did a fantastic job optimizing that beautiful Engine for high FPS and zero stuttering!
Posted on Reply
#11
JustBenching
GrimlingEspecially those that are made with UE5!
They really did a fantastic job optimizing that beautiful Engine for high FPS and zero stuttering!
I don't have any particular problem with ue5 games and stuttering. The last game I had that happen was the Jedi game but that was a couple of years old by now. Supposedly the new dawnwalker also has similar issues but haven't played it yet. Overall games are a lot more optimized nowadays.
Posted on Reply
#12
Grimling
JustBenchingI don't have any particular problem with ue5 games and stuttering. The last game I had that happen was the Jedi game but that was a couple of years old by now. Supposedly the new dawnwalker also has similar issues but haven't played it yet. Overall games are a lot more optimized nowadays.
Neither Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order nor Star Wars Jedi: Survivor uses UE5. They both use UE4!
Posted on Reply
#13
MikOnTopGG
If Nvidia is just going to reuse the same monolithic Ada/Blackwell mid-die layout with a memory bus narrower than a highway lane, what's the point? If we don't see a proper node transition down to TSMC N2 or a chiplet architecture, the 6060 is just going to be another clock-pushed rebadge

And who cares if the BS6 outperforms it? Even if it does, that won't make people just shift to console.
Posted on Reply
#14
JohH
My bet is that Nvidia has the design done already. But won't start tape out until needed - to preemptively crap on Radeon's parade as usual.
Posted on Reply
#15
Hecate91
TheinsanegamerNNvidia doesn't care about consumers because *checks notes* low end cards exist.

That is some competitive level virtue signalling.
Low end cards which will remain without any new gen replacing them until 2029, apparently.
That is some competitive level corporate glazing.
JustBenchingI don't have any particular problem with ue5 games and stuttering.
Use something besides a 4090, turn off upscaling and frame gen and you'll see the problem.
Posted on Reply
#16
AntiX3DGlazer
Renowned leaker Kepler_L2 "who is often wrong"



this is becoming my thing now. If you know you know.
Posted on Reply
#17
Chrispy_
TheinsanegamerNNvidia doesn't care about consumers because *checks notes* low end cards exist.

That is some competitive level virtue signalling.
"We're not making the cards you want because we're too stinking greedy to give you impoverished consumers the products we can sell to datacenters but here's some overpriced low end scaps that the datacenters can't use . Oh, and 'sorry, not sorry' about the 8GB of VRAM, that's all you're getting and you'll learn to like it!"
Posted on Reply
#18
Krit
RedelZaVednoWhat can man say? It's a 💩 show
For team green it's just another normal day. A spit in the face wasn't enough—now expect a bucket of shit on top of your heads!

If you buy a such a shit "the worst gpu generation ever realased" in such a volumes aviously at least in theory the next gen shold be a disaster.

Once i said..... Even then red flags were everywhere.
Posted on Reply
#19
friocasa
Chrispy_Nvidia DGAF about consumers any more. Their AI circular investment bros are paying 100x more for everything.

If you haven't already done so, get a decent card that plays today's games and call it a day. Progress in graphics is going to slow right down because everyone is hellbent on throwing 110% of their available resources into AI slop that you have to rent from their cloud.
Companies, and especially publicly traded ones, only care about one thing: money

They're going to sell to whom pays them the most, and if there isn't enough for everyone, they will stop selling the least profitable ones, you would do the same in their situation, the RTX PRO 5500 uses the exact same chip as the RTX 5090

The recommendation of buying just what you need today has always been the best strategy, not because of AI, but the ever increasing diminishing returns performance/price the higher you go, and that games will not make another big jump until next gen consoles get games designed just for them
Posted on Reply
#20
chrcoluk
This would be brilliant news, and if we combine it with car crash sales of a 1000USD PS6, then it might actually for game dev's to lower their ambitions on fidelity for performance.
Posted on Reply
#21
JustBenching
Chrispy_"We're not making the cards you want because we're too stinking greedy to give you impoverished consumers the products we can sell to datacenters but here's some overpriced low end scaps that the datacenters can't use . Oh, and 'sorry, not sorry' about the 8GB of VRAM, that's all you're getting and you'll learn to like it!"
When you are using the word greedy to describe someone that would sell to the highest bidder then the word loses all of it's meaning. Selling your products to the highest bidder isn't greedy, it's the common business practice in a market auction. The alternative would be to sell it to the lowest bidder, which makes no sense.

8 gb of vram isn't all we are getting. Besides the 5060 every other gpu has more than 8...what are you talking about?
friocasaCompanies, and especially publicly traded ones, only care about one thing: money
It's not just companies. Everyone does. You want to buy something, youll buy it from the shop that has the lowest price, not the one that has the highest (all else being equal of course). You want to sell something (your used PC parts), youll sell it for the highest price, not the lowest.
Posted on Reply
#22
Hecate91
friocasaCompanies, and especially publicly traded ones, only care about one thing: money

They're going to sell to whom pays them the most, and if there isn't enough for everyone, they will stop selling the least profitable ones, you would do the same in their situation, the RTX PRO 5500 uses the exact same chip as the RTX 5090

The recommendation of buying just what you need today has always been the best strategy, not because of AI, but the ever increasing diminishing returns performance/price the higher you go, and that games will not make another big jump until next gen consoles get games designed just for them
There is only caring about money and there is slowly backing out of the market that put Nvidia where they are today, it seems they're doing the latter since Jensen is at the helm of the AI bubble which is also destroying tech ownership by pricing out the everyday person, because money from mere consumers is no longer good enough. However I'm not surprised people are defending a company for doing so, just don't complain when you have no other option except to have a subscription to an Nvidia GPU in the cloud.

Nvidia could easily sell both the RTX pro cards, and consumer versions, I'm sure they could use some of their trillions to fund TSMC building another fab, or they could simply buy more fab space.

Anyone who bought a card within the past few years is very lucky, however anyone who wants or needs a new GPU now has to consider current pricing or is in for a long wait until next gen GPU's launch. The diminishing returns in performance increases is due to how greedy these companies are, AI is definitely causing progress to slow down significantly.
Posted on Reply
#23
N/A
Well, unless you live in Japan, PS6 is also years away. And 6060 series includes a Ti that is 25% faster, but it won't include 30 GB like the PS6 albeit system plus video buffer. So we're looking at a 6 months uncontested PS6 reign.
Posted on Reply
#24
Godrilla
So this suggests the cronies don't expect a crash until 2029 or later. Oof.
Posted on Reply
#25
TumbleGeorge
JustBenchingSelling your products to the highest bidder isn't greedy, it's the common business practice in a market auction. The alternative would be to sell it to the lowest bidder, which makes no sense.
You make no sense skipping the entire market between the extreme possibilities of minimum and maximum.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts