Tuesday, July 7th 2026

Lexar to Use CXMT Chips for Upcoming THOR RGB DDR5 Kits Rated Up to 7600 MT/s

Lexar is preparing new DDR5 memory kits built around CXMT (ChangXin Memory Technologies) chips, and the jump in speed over previous CXMT-based products is notable. Earlier kits using CXMT memory were limited to 6000 MT/s while the new modules push that to 7200 MT/s and 7600 MT/s, both running CL38 timings at 1.4 V. The new kits will launch under the THOR II name in the existing THOR RGB DDR5 lineup in 32 GB dual-channel configurations using two 16 GB modules. CPU-Z data backing the 7600 MT/s claim has already surfaced, with the faster kit identified by the module name LD5U16G76C38BV.

MSI recently demonstrated CXMT-based DDR5 hitting 8000 MT/s on AMD platforms, which signals that these chips have more overclocking headroom than their mainstream entry-level positioning suggested. However, the new Lexar kits don't seem to quite reach that speed, but 7600 MT/s at CL38 is competitive with what other memory vendors are offering in the same tier. No pricing or release date has been announced yet by Lexar for its upcoming THOR II RGB DDR5 memory kits. Looking back at CXMT, it does seem that the Chinese company has managed to close the gap with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Moreover, recent reports stated that even Apple is negotiating with the U.S. government to get clearance to use sanctioned CXMT memory chips in its products.
Source: IT Home
Add your own comment

24 Comments on Lexar to Use CXMT Chips for Upcoming THOR RGB DDR5 Kits Rated Up to 7600 MT/s

#1
phanbuey
Western memory makers learning:
Posted on Reply
#2
Marsil
I know all CXMT production will end up in data centers, so such news don't please me at all :-/
Posted on Reply
#3
phanbuey
MarsilI know all CXMT production will end up in data centers, so such news don't please me at all :-/
Nah meta already starting to sell capacity - they're overbuilt. There's going to be a flood of cheap memory soon. We're gonna be making coasters and keychains out of it.
Posted on Reply
#4
Noci
More competition is good normally (for consumers) ;) .
Lets see what it brings in the current industrial culture of greed.
MarsilI know all CXMT production will end up in data centers, so such news don't please me at all :-/
There will be a point in time that, that market will be saturated. Time will tell....
Posted on Reply
#5
_roman_
Does the usual consumer really care about what chips are on the kit. They manufacturers hide it quite well. and the translation tables about which dram chips are on which DRAM kit are only shared on nerdy forums like hardwareluxx.de

No one can eat morals. Cheap memory and if consumer will value those high dram prices may reflect on some future consumer purchases. Many will still give samsung, sk-hynix, crucial the cash regardless of the past. Some will even consider where the memory is made. I'm curious myself on how I will react on future purchases, price over morals who made the dram.
Posted on Reply
#6
Dr. Dro
_roman_Does the usual consumer really care about what chips are on the kit. They manufacturers hide it quite well. and the translation tables about which dram chips are on which DRAM kit are only shared on nerdy forums like hardwareluxx.de

No one can eat morals. Cheap memory and if consumer will value those high dram prices may reflect on some future consumer purchases. Many will still give samsung, sk-hynix, crucial the cash regardless of the past. Some will even consider where the memory is made. I'm curious myself on how I will react on future purchases, price over morals who made the dram.
The answer is no, the average consumer does not care. But we currently do have market segmentation based on the IC vendor, and only very recently any CXMT ICs were used in kits meant to be sold outside the mainland China market.
Posted on Reply
#7
Hecate91
I couldn't care less what chips are on the kit of RAM sticks, some overclockers might, but OC'ing has been generally pointless for a while.
I'll gladly buy RAM with CXMT made chips on it, if it means they can break into the market and undercut the big 3 RAM cartel.
Posted on Reply
#8
Chaitanya
Just like in case of LCDs, a big hole has been left in DRAM market which will get filled by someone new and kill the market for "traditional" players.
Posted on Reply
#10
ISSEnterprise
This should be done few years back when the Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron memory are still 'cheap'.
Posted on Reply
#11
Philaphlous
"premium" brand using non-premium hardware...makes sense. For profit. I feel like I just heard about CXMT about a month ago....wow they move fast.
Posted on Reply
#12
Hereticbar
phanbueyNah meta already starting to sell capacity - they're overbuilt. There's going to be a flood of cheap memory soon. We're gonna be making coasters and keychains out of it.
Didn't we hear this for months now?

Years of investing in the financial markets, mostly stocks, has taught me that the the market can stay irrational longer than anyone of us can stay solvent. There's always a greater fool that is willing to keep investing in AI, thus propping up the bubble. Sustained market momentum usually meant bubbles and market sell-offs can last for years.
ISSEnterpriseThis should be done few years back when the Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron memory are still 'cheap'.
This kind of hard for CXMT to do this a few years back. They are a relatively new company, they only started to manufacture DDR5 memory in 2025.

In the last few years, they were also alleged to have stole trade secrets from Samsung and SK Hynix. I guess they could have stolen the technology earlier?
Posted on Reply
#13
Icon Charlie
HereticbarDidn't we hear this for months now?

Years of investing in the financial markets, mostly stocks, has taught me that the the market can stay irrational longer than anyone of us can stay solvent. There's always a greater fool that is willing to keep investing in AI, thus propping up the bubble. Sustained market momentum usually meant bubbles and market sell-offs can last for years.




This kind of hard for CXMT to do this a few years back. They are a relatively new company, they only started to manufacture DDR5 memory in 2025.

In the last few years, they were also alleged to have stole trade secrets from Samsung and SK Hynix. I guess they could have stolen the technology earlier?
5%.. only 5% of my portfolio is on individial Stock. for the exact reason of hearsay, rumors, speculation, control and emotion that runs the stock market a lot more than 20+ years ago. Which is why I'm rather on the wealthy side of things.

Though I am a proponent of Index, Mutuals, Annunities, CD's and of course investment properties.

My concern with CMXT is not the quality, its the market manipulating the Dram Prices.


ALSO BlackRock and Vanguard own sizable holdings in Micron. You know the company that has decided that Crucial Has got to go.

Just sayn'
Posted on Reply
#14
_roman_
DRAM overclocking is not pointless on X570 and B550 with ryzen 5000 and crucial ballistix dram, or hynix a die on x670 / x670e.

I think some have no idea about compile times, that is my benchmark. am4 yielded more performance regarding dram
Posted on Reply
#15
Chomiq
Hecate91I couldn't care less what chips are on the kit of RAM sticks, some overclockers might, but OC'ing has been generally pointless for a while.
I'll gladly buy RAM with CXMT made chips on it, if it means they can break into the market and undercut the big 3 merge into 4 RAM cartel.
There, fixed it for you.
Posted on Reply
#16
R0H1T
phanbueyNah meta already starting to sell capacity - they're overbuilt. There's going to be a flood of cheap memory soon. We're gonna be making coasters and keychains out of it.
I'll need to see it play out in the real world before we, as consumers, can declare any sort of victory! Seen too many times that prices bumped up never really come down, even when demand is scarce ~ I hope this doesn't happen with NAND or DRAM but yeah let's hope for the best.
Posted on Reply
#17
Hecate91
ChomiqThere, fixed it for you.
Yeah that might happen also, CXMT has no reason to undercut the big 3.
Posted on Reply
#18
Chomiq
Hecate91Yeah that might happen also, CXMT has no reason to undercut the big 3.
They've already agreed last year that they will match their prices.
Posted on Reply
#19
Hyderz
In the early days intel used to make ram, I’m not sure about optane whether they closed or sold off.. but imagine they kept it going until now… be raking in tons
Posted on Reply
#20
Onasi
HyderzIn the early days intel used to make ram, I’m not sure about optane whether they closed or sold off.. but imagine they kept it going until now… be raking in tons
If by “early days” you mean 40+ years ago - sure. But it’s hardly relevant in 2026. Optane is completely different, it was a NAND alternative and they quit that business a while ago.
Posted on Reply
#21
Chomiq
HyderzIn the early days intel used to make ram, I’m not sure about optane whether they closed or sold off.. but imagine they kept it going until now… be raking in tons
In the early days AMD used to have their own fabs.
Posted on Reply
#22
phanbuey
HereticbarDidn't we hear this for months now?

Years of investing in the financial markets, mostly stocks, has taught me that the the market can stay irrational longer than anyone of us can stay solvent. There's always a greater fool that is willing to keep investing in AI, thus propping up the bubble. Sustained market momentum usually meant bubbles and market sell-offs can last for years.




This kind of hard for CXMT to do this a few years back. They are a relatively new company, they only started to manufacture DDR5 memory in 2025.

In the last few years, they were also alleged to have stole trade secrets from Samsung and SK Hynix. I guess they could have stolen the technology earlier?
The stock market yes - the physical market less so.
Posted on Reply
#23
tsurugi
HyderzIn the early days intel used to make ram, I’m not sure about optane whether they closed or sold off.. but imagine they kept it going until now… be raking in tons
Optane's performance is outstanding among NAND, but intel wanted to use it as DRAM, and was helpless when the whole industry shifted to HBM, which meant optane could not generate revenue, which is why intel had to abandon the technology.
Posted on Reply
#24
[XC] Oj101
_roman_Does the usual consumer really care about what chips are on the kit
Not since I was looking for TCCD, BH5, D9GMH, etc. These day's, RAM's RAM.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 03:32 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts