Thursday, December 18th 2025

Significant 8 nm Order at Samsung Foundry Linked to Futuristic Intel 900-series Chipset

Earlier in the year, Samsung's foundry business reportedly attracted a new set of orders from important clients. Instead of the "still in-progress" cutting-edge 2 nm GAA node process (aka SF2), key customers selected more mature production lines: 5 nm and 8 nm. Approximately seven months later, Intel is reportedly on Samsung Foundry's production order books, with semiconductor industry insiders disclosing details of a major deal. According to a two-day-old Hankyung news article, a next-gen Platform Controller Hub (PCH) design has been linked to a "legacy-grade" 8-nanometer node. Inside trackers reckon that Team Blue's futuristic mainboard chipset is heading towards mass production, with a "full-scale" phase anticipated next year.

Speculation points to the eventual arrival of 900-series chipsets; destined to control "Nova Lake" desktop processors. In theory, a flagship variant—perhaps "Z990"—could be the first of Intel's 8 nm PCH products to reach retail by late 2026. Currently, the foundry service's Taylor, Texas-based facility—aka Samsung Austin Semiconductor—produces a selection of current-gen 14 nm chipsets for Team Blue. Back in South Korea, the Hwaseong 8 nm production line can pump out about 30,000 to 40,000 wafers per month. It is possible that Intel has favored Samsung's native operation due to a high level of node maturity and operational reliability.
Sources: Hankyung, SamMobile, DigiTimes Asia, Tweak Town, Chosun Biz (historical), Enostech (render image source), jukan05 Tweet
Add your own comment

9 Comments on Significant 8 nm Order at Samsung Foundry Linked to Futuristic Intel 900-series Chipset

#1
Philaphlous
Welcome to 2026...nothing screams the future more than 8nm..
Posted on Reply
#2
kondamin
PhilaphlousWelcome to 2026...nothing screams the future more than 8nm..
Chipset's have always been on older nodes, they were the stuff tsmc used to make for intel.
Posted on Reply
#3
soulphie
kondaminChipset's have always been on older nodes, they were the stuff tsmc used to make for intel.
I got no problem with the mature node being used for the PCH but why is intel still outsourcing production?
They have equivalent nodes like intel 7 (at capacity, i understand why they would not go with their 10 nm node) or intel 4.
Unless they are saying that their own intel 4 node (7nm) is more expensive to produce then samsung 8nm is to buy. If that is the case then who would every buy intel 7 4 or 3?
Posted on Reply
#4
Fluke
What node is Promontory 21 manufactured in?
Posted on Reply
#5
soulphie
FlukeWhat node is Promontory 21 manufactured in?
as far as i can tell there is no info on that
Posted on Reply
#6
igormp
FlukeWhat node is Promontory 21 manufactured in?
x570 apparently was a repurposed Ryzen 3000 IOD, so 14nm. The lower-end chipsets were on 55nm.
Prom21 was said to be cheaper than x570, given that ASMEDIA is the one responsible for it, I guess they should be using 32nm or something like that.

Guesswork apart, there's no public info on that, as said above.
Posted on Reply
#7
soulphie
igormpx570 apparently was a repurposed Ryzen 3000 IOD, so 14nm. The lower-end chipsets were on 55nm.
Prom21 was said to be cheaper than x570, given that ASMEDIA is the one responsible for it, I guess they should be using 32nm or something like that.

Guesswork apart, there's no public info on that, as said above.
I just remembered i have a CrossHair VI laying around (X370 chipset) and i took of the heatsink to have a look and maybe you guys can find out more then i could in the last 15 mins. Its the amd 218-0891007 i can find replacement chips but nothing about the specs.
Posted on Reply
#8
Fluke
Huh? I was talking about Promontory 21, which is the chipset currently used in 600 and 800 series AM5 boards.
Posted on Reply
#9
soulphie
FlukeHuh? I was talking about Promontory 21, which is the chipset currently used in 600 and 800 series AM5 boards.
yeah i was trying to add some workable info to what Igormp said, a 12nm io die for X570 sounds expensive compared to 55nm for the lower end chipsets and there is nothing cited as a starting point in this thread
Posted on Reply
Nov 15th, 2026 11:19 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts