Thursday, May 14th 2026

AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 Officially Arrives to Radeon RX 7000/6000 GPUs

AMD has responded to what gamers have been most vocal about: bringing its FSR 4.1 upscaling technology to older RDNA 3 and RDNA 2 GPUs. Today, we learn that this dream is becoming a reality, as AMD is officially introducing its FSR Upscaling 4.1 technology to millions of Radeon RX 7000 Series graphics cards worldwide. Arriving this July, millions of RDNA 3 gamers will enjoy official support for FSR Upscaling 4.1 in over 300 supported games. This means that, just like the latest RDNA 4-based Radeon RX 9000 Series, RDNA 3 gamers will also benefit from the upscaling algorithms based on various machine learning techniques without needing to upgrade to the latest Radeon RX 9000 GPUs if their current GPU performs adequately.

Interestingly, the FSR Upscaling 4.1 will use the same underlying model on RDNA 3 as it does on RDNA 4. However, differences in hardware create some background variations, as RDNA 4 has FP8 processing units and INT8, whereas RDNA 3 only has INT8. AMD explains that the company has developed FSR Upscaling 4.1 with the FP8 format in mind, while the latest ML algorithm has been optimized and ported for the INT8 data format to work with RDNA 3. This difference in hardware support delayed AMD's port of FSR technologies to RDNA GPU IP below version four, but it is now finally making an appearance.
Finally, FSR Upscaling 4.1 is also coming to older RDNA 2 GPUs, but that port will have to wait until early 2027. This indicates that AMD is doing additional optimization for RDNA 2 cards, as it is challenging to port this upscaling algorithm to hardware that isn't optimal for the latest techniques. However, it is promising that it is possible, and RDNA 2 gamers will just have to wait a bit longer.
Source: Jack Huynh on X
Add your own comment

252 Comments on AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 Officially Arrives to Radeon RX 7000/6000 GPUs

#1
Dr. Dro
That's excellent news. It just shouldn't have happened after a year of the community being angry at AMD over this...

Their muted response to providing highly requested features like this in a reasonable time frame sold more GeForce cards than Jensen ever could by now.
Posted on Reply
#2
sam_86314
Actually wasn't expecting them to do this, this is hopefully great news.

I've messed with the leaked FSR4.0 INT8 on my RDNA2 GPUs, and while the performance impact is greater than FSR3 or XeSS, it looks way better than both of those.

I've been pretty happy with how much better FSR4 is over 3 on my 9070 XT (especially with Optiscaler to replace DLSS with it).
Posted on Reply
#4
Shihab
I hope their PR people aren't expecting positive performance reviews off this. They way these geniuses have been "performing" the past few months, I am surprised we aren't hearing of layoffs at big Red...
Posted on Reply
#5
windwhirl
Dr. DroThat's excellent news. It just shouldn't have happened after a year of the community being angry at AMD over this...

Their muted response to providing highly requested features like this in a reasonable time frame sold more GeForce cards than Jensen ever could by now.
They could have literally just said "We're working on a RDNA2/3 version of FSR4, but it's gonna take a while because FSR4 was designed mainly for RDNA4" and it'd have saved them like, half the outrage at least.
Posted on Reply
#7
Apocalypsee
That's a surprise to be honest I thought they would never do this officially. Even extending to RDNA 2 no less.
Posted on Reply
#8
TheGeekn°72
Extremely surprised to hear of this move, I wonder if Valve convinced them? in any case, this is amazing, late but amazing
Posted on Reply
#9
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
windwhirlThey could have literally just said "We're working on a RDNA2/3 version of FSR4, but it's gonna take a while because FSR4 was designed mainly for RDNA4" and it'd have saved them like, half the outrage at least.
Without the outrage, who says they would have released it at all?
Posted on Reply
#10
GodisanAtheist
As usual AMD does the right thing after damaging their reputation for seemingly no reason.

Even a "we're looking into it and this is why it's taking a while" a year ago would have calmed the storm considerably.

Now that tons of people have sworn off AMD,n possibly picked up a 5xxx series instead of a 9xxx series, literally had April Fools articles poking fun at the situation... They make this announcement.

Incredible.
Posted on Reply
#11
TheinsanegamerN
Just like with their driver issues and with supporting ryzen 3 and 5000 on older chipsets, it turns out bullying works, and AMD needs it constantly.
Posted on Reply
#12
PixelTech
Nooice, don't have to see those complaining comments anymore.
Posted on Reply
#13
TheinsanegamerN
ThomasKFinally the day has come that Nvidia owners can shut up about it.


Kthxbye.
And us AMD owners, as well as consumers in general, will continue to talk about it because we still have rights as consumers and are allowed to talk about bad ideas without funding them.
Posted on Reply
#14
PixelTech
GodisanAtheistAs usual AMD does the right thing after damaging their reputation for seemingly no reason.

Even a "we're looking into it and this is why it's taking a while" a year ago would have calmed the storm considerably.

Now that tons of people have sworn off AMD,n possibly picked up a 5xxx series instead of a 9xxx series, literally had April Fools articles poking fun at the situation... They make this announcement.

Incredible.
This may be due to AMD looking into if it's possible before stating they're working on for d2/3.
Also, this only costs them money and doesn't generate money. So low priority. FoLlOw tHe mOnEy!
Posted on Reply
#15
Sol_Badguy
Good guy AMD, gotta love it! :rockout::peace::clap::toast:
Scarlet Cortex next, let's gooo!!!
PixelTechAlso, this only costs them money and doesn't generate money. So low priority. FoLlOw tHe mOnEy!
I would have to disagree!
It creates fanbase loyalty, people like to be treated nicely, if they are chances are they will come back to you for future products, if you treat them like crap and lock them out of features their hardware supports and also cut driver support earlier than the competition chances are they will look elsewhere for what they want!
Posted on Reply
#16
Dr. Dro
dgianstefaniWithout the outrage, who says they would have released it at all?
Which is exactly why performative garbage PR posts disgust me.

"As a lifelong gamer I spend a lot of time thinking about..." no, you don't.
PixelTechThis may be due to AMD looking into if it's possible before stating they're working on for d2/3.
Also, this only costs them money and doesn't generate money. So low priority. FoLlOw tHe mOnEy!
We've known it's possible before it even released for RX 9000 GPUs. AMD took every step, technical and legal, to block it until now.
Posted on Reply
#18
Rulumi
PixelTechThis may be due to AMD looking into if it's possible before stating they're working on for d2/3.
Also, this only costs them money and doesn't generate money. So low priority. FoLlOw tHe mOnEy!
It has been known it was possible in a fine enough way at least in RDNA 3 for a long while, I think it was more of looking into if it was possible to not do it without users backlash.

As for costs, all the bad PR of this and a lot of other things with Radeon in the last time costs them more money in the long run, becuse it costs them losing more revenue (sales) and users in the long time.
Posted on Reply
#19
Dr. Dro
WindysonWho blames Sony ?
Sony has no such power over AMD, never has and never will.
Posted on Reply
#21
Rabit
My Rx 6750xt working now with FSR 4.02.c getting official support will be nice.
Posted on Reply
#22
Youseethis
Surprising. Will they update the driver branch as well?
Posted on Reply
#23
ZoneDymo
Took them WAY too long.
I wonder if this is somehow AI related, like AMD checking where it was all heading and like Nvidia they are probably holding off making new consumer cards in favor of datacenter hardware.
Therefor they will keep selling 6000/7000 and 9000 longer then planned, with that in mind it makes more sense to now bring this software to older (now longer relevant) hardware.
Posted on Reply
#24
Dr. Dro
YouseethisSurprising. Will they update the driver branch as well?
At this point this seems extremely unlikely. Driver development has been completely branched at this point, because the RDNA 1/2 servicing branch (25.10) uses an older code base. 25.30 is already phased out and it is 26.10 drivers that currently service RDNA 3 and 4. The code that supports RDNA 1/2 is mostly gone by now from the 26.10 releases.

GCN products remain on 23.19 which is very old, and consolidated at this point. Very minor bug fixes only every 6 months, unless security issues are found.
Posted on Reply
#25
Lew Zealand
windwhirlThey could have literally just said "We're working on a RDNA2/3 version of FSR4, but it's gonna take a while because FSR4 was designed mainly for RDNA4" and it'd have saved them like, half the outrage at least.
dgianstefaniWithout the outrage, who says they would have released it at all?
GodisanAtheistAs usual AMD does the right thing after damaging their reputation for seemingly no reason.
All of this.

It's Ryzen 3000 and 5000 on B350/X370 all over again. What I gotta wonder is in AMD's management, are their engineers solving these "problems" (clearly yes) but management is simply too incompetent to let them cook because they're paralyzed by.... quarterly revenue projections? board partner complaints? WTFFFF is it???

As usual complaining customers and tech media have seemingly straightened AMD's ship yet again, should we get a pool together and bet what AMD's next PR faceplant will be?

Whatever.

My 6800 XT and 6600 XT will emerge from their cocoons in July to see how this all plays out.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 08:27 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts