Tuesday, September 22nd 2026

Manufacturers Reportedly Planning Both 4 GB and 6 GB GDDR7 Chips For 2027-28

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 currently ships with 2 GB GDDR7 modules, but even 3 GB modules have seen limited adoption due to their high cost. However, that could change soon. According to Weibo leaker Golden Pig Upgrade, memory manufacturers are reportedly planning 4 GB and 6 GB GDDR7 chips for a 2027 to 2028 window, a jump that could reshape how much VRAM budget and mid-range GPUs can carry without needing a wider memory bus. A 128-bit card using four memory packages currently tops out at 8 GB with today's 2 GB chips. Move to 4 GB chips and that same card could hit 16 GB, or 24 GB with 6 GB modules. Scale that up to a 256-bit interface with eight packages, and you're looking at 32 GB or 48 GB respectively, without touching the PCB layout or bus width. Of course, going the other way is possible too, a narrower memory bus combined with higher density, faster memory chips, can lead to similar bandwidth, with lower relative cost.

This would matter most at the low end, where narrow 128-bit buses have made generous VRAM capacities either awkward or expensive to pull off. Videocardz, citing supply chain sources, notes that today's 3 GB GDDR7 chips are already unusually expensive due to extreme demand, and that cost has reportedly contributed to delays around the rumored RTX 5050 9 GB and the RTX 50 Super refresh. If 4 GB chips end up cheaper to produce at scale, they could become the more practical choice for mainstream cards, while 6 GB modules might make more sense for workstation and other high-memory GPUs first. It's worth noting that the leaker's timeline only points to sometime in 2027 or 2028, so there's no confirmation this lines up with NVIDIA's RTX 60 series or AMD's next Radeon generation specifically.
Sources: Golden Pig Upgrade Pack on Weibo, Videocardz, via Notebookcheck
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Manufacturers Reportedly Planning Both 4 GB and 6 GB GDDR7 Chips For 2027-28

#1
N/A
Only for Quadro. if RTX 6080 is 20GB, Quadro GR203 doubles that to 40GB for professional use.
Posted on Reply
#2
wNotyarD
Nice, more VRAM for datacenters /s
Posted on Reply
#3
Harbinger Ace
Higher-capacity chips will constrain the already-limiting memory buses provided on GPUs. Plenty of non-gaming tasks are memory-intensive, and I seem to recall LLMs being quite so.

If this comes to workstation or consumer GPUs, it'd be a good ways out without this memory "shortage." Because of that, though, I have doubts consumer platforms will see these chips at all.
Posted on Reply
#4
Red Hood
these will end up in workstation ai cards
Posted on Reply
#5
rattlehead99
Oh damn, 4GB was expected, but 6GB? That's big.

Of course the memory crisis is a problem, but besides that, 6GB chips sound awesome. 128 bit 24-48GB cards sound great to me.
Posted on Reply
#6
Hecate91
These will be in mostly AI cards, we'll probably get 3GB VRAM chips.
Posted on Reply
#7
MikOnTopGG
I don't know.

Sounds kinda sus to me...
Posted on Reply
#8
TumbleGeorge
rattlehead99Oh damn, 4GB was expected, but 6GB? That's big.

Of course the memory crisis is a problem, but besides that, 6GB chips sound awesome. 128 bit 24-48GB cards sound great to me.
JEDEC says also 8GB(64Gbit) GDDR7. That means that today's 2GB looks like some kind of premature size. :D.
Posted on Reply
#9
Wirko
What about physical die sizes? DRAM density aren't going to double or triple between early 2025 and 2028, so I would expect these new chips to be larger and require more space around the processor.
Posted on Reply
#10
wNotyarD
WirkoWhat about physical die sizes? DRAM density aren't going to double or triple between early 2025 and 2028, so I would expect these new chips to be larger and require more space around the processor.
Changing the footprint of the chips is counterproductive. So I believe the density will indeed increase.
Posted on Reply
#11
TumbleGeorge
wNotyarDChanging the footprint of the chips is counterproductive. So I believe the density will indeed increase.
Sandwich from two layers 16Gb for 32Gb?
Posted on Reply
#12
Denver
Cards with 64-bit memory buses and 12GB of VRAM are coming. It’s not as bad as it seems if we get GDDR7 chips rated at 36Gbps or higher. I guess the low-end market will be happier with 12GB and 288 GB/s than with higher bandwidth and a miserable 8GB.
Posted on Reply
#13
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
N/AOnly for Quadro. if RTX 6080 is 20GB, Quadro GR203 doubles that to 40GB for professional use.
Yeah I suspect 20 GB too. Maybe 40 GB for 6090 if its still double the xx80, but we'll see.
rattlehead99Oh damn, 4GB was expected, but 6GB? That's big.

Of course the memory crisis is a problem, but besides that, 6GB chips sound awesome. 128 bit 24-48GB cards sound great to me.
Hopefully the 6 GB version eases demand for the 2/3 GB and maybe even 4 GB variants (I doubt it for 4 GB), so we see these used in consumer cards due to becoming a non-moronic economical choice by manufacturers (why sell to consumer when you can sell to DC for 10x more).
Hecate91These will be in mostly AI cards, we'll probably get 3GB VRAM chips.
Still a decent thing, considering that's 50% more than what we have. Of course we'll probably realistically see the same or maybe 20% more VRAM at pricing tiers due to costs still being very high.

At least RDNA will take advantage of GDDR7, instead of GDDR6 (non-X).
WirkoWhat about physical die sizes? DRAM density aren't going to double or triple between early 2025 and 2028, so I would expect these new chips to be larger and require more space around the processor.
Doubt it, only really a major concern for mobile applications from what I understand.
DenverCards with 64-bit memory buses and 12GB of VRAM are coming. It’s not as bad as it seems if we get GDDR7 chips rated at 36Gbps or higher.
We will get those, but I doubt the good bins will be used in entry level cards, I wouldn't expect more than 32 Gbps.
Posted on Reply
#14
kazuviking
Games still barely use 12-14gigs with playable fps. Yea you can crank it to ultra+ when it uses 22gigs but with 10 fps.
Posted on Reply
#15
Wirko
dgianstefaniWe will get those, but I doubt the good bins will be used in entry level cards, I wouldn't expect more than 32 Gbps.
As you mentioned binning - were partially good GDDR chips ever used in a GPU? A 4 GB chip with 3 GB usable and the last 1 GB defective could easily be used as a lower bin part in lower tier graphics cards. Some may say "don't give them ideas" but this idea is not nearly new. A very, very long time ago, half-good 64-kilobit DRAM was sold as 32-kilobit.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts