Tuesday, January 31st 2023

Intel LGA-7529 Socket for "Sierra Forest" Xeon Processors Pictured

Intel's upcoming LGA-7529 socket designed for next-generation Xeon processors has been pictured, thanks to Yuuki_Ans and Hassan Mujtaba. According to the latest photos, we see the massive LGA-7529 socket with an astonishing 7,529 pins placed inside of a single socket. Made for Intel's upcoming "Birch Stream" platform, this socket is going to power Intel's next-generation "Sierra Forest" Xeon processors. With Sierra Forest representing a new way of thinking about Xeon processors, it also requires a special socket. Built on Intel 3 manufacturing process, these Xeon processors use only E-cores in their design to respond to AMD EPYC Bergamo with Zen4c.

The Intel Xeon roadmap will split in 2024, where Sierra Forest will populate dense and efficient cloud computing with E-cores, while its Granite Rapids sibling will power high-performance computing using P-cores. This interesting split will be followed by the new LGA-7529 socket pictured below, which is a step up from Intel's current LGA-4677 socket with 4677 pins used for Sapphire Rapids. With higher core densities and performance targets, the additional pins are likely to be mostly power/ground pins, while the smaller portion is picking up the additional I/O of the processor.

20:20 UTC: Updated with motherboard picture of dual-socket LGA-7529 system, thanks to findings of @9550pro lurking in the Chinese forums.
Sources: Yuuki_Ans (Twitter), Hassan Mujtaba (Twitter), via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

25 Comments on Intel LGA-7529 Socket for "Sierra Forest" Xeon Processors Pictured

#1
Arco
That's no socket. It's a football field!
Posted on Reply
#2
Chaitanya
Too many lines to keep track off, its worse than navigating through an actual rainforest at night.
Posted on Reply
#4
bobbybluz
I think I saw a bent pin in the right upper quadrant.
Posted on Reply
#5
TheoneandonlyMrK
Sierra Forrest? What a name I love it and the literal image it generates in my mind a Forrest of Sierra's.

What a piece of tech, imagine handmaking the prototypes of that monster.

Let me know when I can grab mine Intel.
Posted on Reply
#6
wNotyarD
Yay, another new Intel roadmap!
Posted on Reply
#7
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
That's incredible.

@AleksandarK you've switched between 7529 and 7592 in the article, but 7592 is correct. :)
Posted on Reply
#8
JAB Creations
New socket = new motherboard.
New motherboard != upgrade.

That is called a rebuild.

Go take a lot at those Intel motherboards and start counting all the Intel chips that you can see and then the device drivers for Intel things like Nic and WIFI.

With ~80% of the market still blindly buying Intel how are they "missing" their goals? :rolleyes:

AMD may fumble from time to time though I've never seen them make an effort to screw over their customers.
Posted on Reply
#9
Tropick
ChaitanyaToo many lines to keep track off, its worse than navigating through an actual rainforest at night.
Don't worry, the inevitable delays will give us plenty of time to figure out which product line is which :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#12
TheLostSwede
News Editor
sepheronxWho needs a case?
You're at least wearing noise cancelling headphones, right?
Posted on Reply
#13
Wirko
AleksandarKWith higher core densities and performance targets, the additional pins are likely to be mostly power/ground pins, while the smaller portion is picking up the additional I/O of the processor.
There are 12 memory channels as it appears, compared to Sapphire Rapids' 8. Those too use a lot of pins.
Posted on Reply
#14
sepheronx
TheLostSwedeYou're at least wearing noise cancelling headphones, right?
I'm near deaf so I'm good.
Posted on Reply
#15
Zareek
These server sockets are getting absurd! You could fit an entire PC into the space that socket takes up. I'm sure there are a few that are smaller.
Posted on Reply
#16
mashie
A few more years and we can revive the classic "Over 9000" jokes.
Posted on Reply
#17
pressing on
ZareekThese server sockets are getting absurd! You could fit an entire PC into the space that socket takes up. I'm sure there are a few that are smaller.
There are, but for example AMD latest server socket - SP5 - is 6096 pins and that's a step up from the previous server socket that had 4094 contacts. There are good reasons for the increase such as 12 memory channels instead of 8 and DDR5 memory instead of DDR4.
Posted on Reply
#18
Minus Infinity
This is definitely one cpu you won't see for the Forest
Posted on Reply
#19
Chaitanya
TropickDon't worry, the inevitable delays will give us plenty of time to figure out which product line is which :laugh:
By the time fog clears we will be back to drowning in lakes.
Posted on Reply
#20
The_Enigma
TheLostSwedeSomeone in a forum in xina posted a picture of the full board.
Good luck finding a suitable case.

Looks like a typical server MB to me, easy to find. Those are OCP slots on the back, also semi-standard now days.

Here is a Xeon server board from a couple generations ago for example:


And here is an AMD Zen4 Epyc 1P board:


In that one though the OCP socket is off to the side hidden by the monitor and they have ten EDSFF slots for solid state drives where the Xeon board has its OCP slots.
Servers are just VERY different these days than the typical PC most of us know. Far longer, and much more dense components. For anyone wondering what the heck an "OCP slot" or "EDSFF" is:
www.servethehome.com/ocp-nic-3-0-form-factors-quick-guide-intel-broadcom-nvidia-meta-inspur-dell-emc-hpe-lenovo-gigabyte-supermicro/
www.servethehome.com/e1-and-e3-edsff-to-take-over-from-m-2-and-2-5-in-ssds-kioxia/#:~:text=EDSFF%20Overview,2U%20sized%20E3%20form%20factors.
Posted on Reply
#21
HansRapad
JAB CreationsNew socket = new motherboard.
New motherboard != upgrade.


That is called a rebuild.

Go take a lot at those Intel motherboards and start counting all the Intel chips that you can see and then the device drivers for Intel things like Nic and WIFI.

With ~80% of the market still blindly buying Intel how are they "missing" their goals? :rolleyes:

AMD may fumble from time to time though I've never seen them make an effort to screw over their customers.
I'll put this here, and start seeing the reaction of AMD cultist

www.techspot.com/news/82734-amd-commits-long-term-support-strx4-cpu-socket.html

AMD screw their customer, not just Intel,

Intel today failure is not 2020 issue, it is 2015 failure that still hurting them to this days, it will be couple hard year for intel since the management before Bob Swan is really bad,
Posted on Reply
#22
InVasMani
This thing is massive what the core count and power draw on it!!? That's a lot of memory bandwidth and memory capacity as well, but DDR5 so that'll cost you more than "a kidney" what else do you have to offer!!?
ChaitanyaBy the time fog clears we will be back to drowning in lakes.
That sounds like the title of Steven King horror novel.
TheLostSwedeYou're at least wearing noise cancelling headphones, right?
They'll be needing a pair it's going to be a long afternoon of screaming.
Posted on Reply
#23
Zareek
pressing onThere are, but for example AMD latest server socket - SP5 - is 6096 pins and that's a step up from the previous server socket that had 4094 contacts. There are good reasons for the increase such as 12 memory channels instead of 8 and DDR5 memory instead of DDR4.
It's actually pretty impressive, IMO. These x86 server chips are starting to look like the IBM mainframe monsters more and more every year. I'm just amazed how much the industry has changed over the last 30 years. I still remember picking up my first computer shopper catalog and drooling over the 486DX chips and then first gen Pentiums.
Posted on Reply
#24
The Von Matrices
ZareekThese server sockets are getting absurd! You could fit an entire PC into the space that socket takes up. I'm sure there are a few that are smaller.
It's all about integration. If that leaked image is correct, it looks like Intel has taken AMD's strategy and eliminated the external chipset. So while the CPU socket is bigger, modern server motherboards have only the CPU socket and lots of slots but no other chips so they are overall smaller than they used to be.
Posted on Reply
#25
ypsylon
I'll say only this. After LGA2011 in servers Intel was unable to create solid socket design. All those billions of $ and can't create fool-proof CPU mounting mechanism. AMD since first TR/Epycs has absolutely the best CPU socket (yes, yes I remember Foxconn debacle at the very beginning) ever designed.

It's impressive size, but... so easy to destroy. I've said a while ago. Until Intel creates normal CPU mounting mechanism, I'll never go Xeon/HEDT. AMD TR/Epyc all the way here.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 23rd, 2024 02:54 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts