Friday, January 16th 2026

NVIDIA Reportedly Ends GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Production, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Next

NVIDIA has reportedly stopped production of its mid-range GeForce RTX 5070 Ti graphics card, according to ASUS, one of the largest PC manufacturers. ASUS shared exclusive information with Hardware Unboxed, revealing that NVIDIA has created a supply shortage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, effectively ending its production. As one of NVIDIA's largest AIB partners, ASUS has learned that the model is essentially in end-of-life status. The company noted the supply shortage and offered no further comments on availability or potential improvements in supply. Since retailers and manufacturers can't source enough stock of the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GPUs, the shortage has led to significant price increases for these models and suggests that the future availability of this GPU SKU might be nonexistent.

Update 2, January 16, 08:30 UTC: ASUS issued an official public statement regarding the "incomplete" information about the RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti EOL.
ASUSWe would like to clarify recent reports regarding the ASUS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB. Certain media may have received incomplete information from an ASUS PR representative regarding these products. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB have not been discontinued or designated as end-of-life (EOL). ASUS has no plans to stop selling these models. Current fluctuations in supply for both products are primarily due to memory supply constraints, which have temporarily affected production output and restocking cycles. As a result, availability may appear limited in certain markets, but this should not be interpreted as a production halt or product retirement. ASUS will continue to support the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and is working closely with partners to stabilize supply as conditions improve.
Below is an older update and the remaining of the original text.

Update 1, 19:45 UTC: NVIDIA issued a statement to HardwareLuxx confirming that the series remains in production, but elevated demand is drying up the inventory.
NVIDIA to HardwareLuxxWhat changes are occurring in the GeForce ecosystem given the current memory market?
Demand for GeForce RTX GPUs is strong, and memory supply is constrained. We continue to ship all GeForce SKUs and are working closely with our suppliers to maximize memory availability.
The next phase of the silent production end is approaching for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB version, with resources reportedly being redirected to the lower-capacity GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB version. Stocks of the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB SKU have been dwindling across retailers and distributors, and prices are beginning to reflect this scarcity. The massive industry DRAM shortage has affected even graphics GDDR7 memory. As a result, the lower-capacity 8 GB version will remain available until the supply chain and memory production improve. Yesterday's rumors also confirm that the regular RTX 5060 will be the priority card for NVIDIA going forward, for that segment.

Additionally, ASUS provided information about the previously rumored CES launch of the RTX 50 "SUPER" refresh, which was expected to have higher memory capacity. According to the AIB, this launch did not occur, although the original plan was indeed for a CES launch, which was postponed. Currently, there are no plans to release a series refresh, and some AIBs have reportedly expressed frustration over the sudden change. It seems the rumor about the SUPER launch being postponed was true, with the primary reason being the shortage of high-capacity GDDR7 memory.
Source: Hardware Unboxed
Add your own comment

210 Comments on NVIDIA Reportedly Ends GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Production, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Next

#26
rv8000
hsewI mean if there's a silver lining in this, it's that maybe we will finally see development philosophies trend towards resource efficiency...

Ah, who am I kidding?
Hey now, they’ve got lakes to drain and non-commercial electric grids to ration so grok can spew out some more bs. Efficiency on the whole is a thing of the past. Every piece of silicon serves no better home than in an AI data center! We should be happy they’re still letting us purchase over priced 8gb cards, they’re being very kind…
Posted on Reply
#27
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
lambdaSuch a nice start to 2026.

Fingers crossed that AMD doesn't follow suit.
Don't they use GDDR6? Might not be as big a problem, but I don't know.
Posted on Reply
#28
Gatt
"the regular RTX 5060 will be the priority card for NVIDIA going forward" LOL
Posted on Reply
#29
_roman_
I really wonder when this is a mid-range card, what is than a high end card?

5070ti, 5080, 4090, 5090 are high end. Maybe I classify it totally wrong.
mid-range GeForce RTX 5070 Ti graphics card,
edit: You need a reason to sell a 5080. Removing a 5070ti makes room and gives a better purchase perspective for the 5080
Posted on Reply
#30
dismuter
Gooigi's ExIntel, this is your opening moment! DON’T F$#K IT UP!
Intel is in a worse position, because they don't have a latest-gen 8 GB model to fall back to, in order to keep prices low enough against NVIDIA and AMD. The value of their cards is going to suffer proportionately more.
Posted on Reply
#31
_roman_
Hecate91So Nvidia buyers only have the 5060 8GB, 5070 12GB, or for those willing to spend $1300-1400 on a GPU a 5080.
I think you forgot the Nvidia 3060 wiht 8Gib VRAM. I think I read it will be produced again.
Nothing better as big slow moving pixels and a Nvidia 3060.

Hey: DLSS 4.5 is available for any RTX card. YAY. Nvidia 3060 + DLSS 4.5 for the win.
Posted on Reply
#32
zenlessyank
I quit supporting NVidia after they removed SLI from their lower tier cards. As a happy user of GTX 660 SLI, I was shocked to see they had killed it off.

I am glad they aren't getting any of my money, because, frankly, I have never really seen such anti-consumer conduct before.

That which goes up must come down. I await with eager eyes to see the dead carcass of Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#34
efikkan
There are still good supply of RTX 5070 a great prices, and RX 9070 XT's pricing aren't that bad (yet), so grab'em while you can!

I wonder how the supply is for GDDR6, as it might make sense to release a 12GB version of RX 9070 (non-XT).
TSiAhmatThe year of game optimization is here! (fr, ong)
I'm with you there, we should use every opportunity to encourage actual optimizations. There is a tremendous potential in most current games.
_roman_I really wonder when this is a mid-range card, what is than a high end card?

5070ti, 5080, 4090, 5090 are high end. Maybe I classify it totally wrong.

edit: You need a reason to sell a 5080. Removing a 5070ti makes room and gives a better purchase perspective for the 5080
Normally it's classified by the upper third of the segment in performance metrics, but it's debatable where the threshold should be. Most would regard 5070 and 5070 Ti as upper mid-range.

It would probably make more sense if Nvidia renamed the Ti models and pushed the naming 1-2 tiers down, e.g. 5070 => 5060, 5070 TI => 5070, and so on. At least with the 5060 Ti model the naming makes some sense, since it's slightly better than a 5060, but with 5070/5070 Ti/5080 these are separate tiers.
_roman_I think you forgot the Nvidia 3060 wiht 8Gib VRAM. I think I read it will be produced again.
Nothing better as big slow moving pixels and a Nvidia 3060.

Hey: DLSS 4.5 is available for any RTX card. YAY. Nvidia 3060 + DLSS 4.5 for the win.
At this point it will probably be left-over bins of various chips. Nvidia have a tradition of "cutting down" larger chips to make numerous xx60 cards at the very end of life for their generations. I seriously doubt they will be made in any meaningful quantity though, probably mostly for OEMs.
Posted on Reply
#35
Rover4444
Knew this shit would happen, thank goodness I got my cards at MSRP.
Posted on Reply
#36
LastDudeALive
zenlessyankI quit supporting NVidia after they removed SLI from their lower tier cards. As a happy user of GTX 660 SLI, I was shocked to see they had killed it off.
Removing an irrelevant feature to lower cost and complexity for consumers is good, actually.
zenlessyankI am glad they aren't getting any of my money, because, frankly, I have never really seen such anti-consumer conduct before.

That which goes up must come down. I await with eager eyes to see the dead carcass of Nvidia.
Unfortunately, this is the pro-consumer move. AI is presenting massive price pressure on both VRAM and Blackwell chips. The "best" move for Nvidia (financially speaking) would be to just abandon consumer GPUs completely. Every consumer GPU represents a massive opportunity cost, compared to if that silicon and VRAM had gone into an AI chip instead.

The choice to focus on the most popular and lowest-cost SKUs (the 8GB and 12GB cards) is the best thing for the vast majority of consumers. It's very unfortunate for enthusiasts like us, who want and are willing to pay for higher-tier cards with more VRAM. But we are a small minority of the market. Nvidia has to make tough decisions about where to allocate their limited supply of chips and VRAM, and focusing on the most popular cards ensures that GPUs get to the most people possible.

Although I'd love to upgrade my GPU, I'd rather more people have the opportunity to get into PC gaming with a 5060 or 5070.
Posted on Reply
#38
SoM6
they want folk to rent their cloud service
Posted on Reply
#39
dismuter
SoM6they want folk to rent their cloud service
Are you saying that the real reason is not simply that there's competition for resources with AI, and consumer gaming products are losing that competition? If so, what's not credible about that reason?
Posted on Reply
#40
Tek-Check
Good bye gamers! It was pleasure serving you needs for many years. See you again in a few years when we design all data centers.
The next GeForce event will be live from...Mars, only for those who subscribed to our Martian server GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#41
Dragam1337
lambdaAMD has a stellar track record of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

I wonder whether we'll even see the 6000 series from Nvidia this year, if so the prices will be astronomical.

Chance for Intel to step up.
Nvidia was never going to launch 6000 series in 2026.
_roman_I really wonder when this is a mid-range card, what is than a high end card?

5070ti, 5080, 4090, 5090 are high end. Maybe I classify it totally wrong.


edit: You need a reason to sell a 5080. Removing a 5070ti makes room and gives a better purchase perspective for the 5080
70 cards were always midrange... and neither 5070 ti, nor 5080 uses a big chip. 5080 is highend in name only.
Posted on Reply
#42
wolf
Better Than Native
Best time to secure a card is launch. If the VRAM is nearing the most valuable part of the card, it makes sense the 57ti gets the axe. Lame though, it was the pick of the generation imo.

AMD have a massive opportunity to have the 9070XT win that segment by default here if they if they can stop tripping over their own feet like usual... so don't hold your breath, it's already climbing in price.
Posted on Reply
#43
Nick89
That is insane. It has only been out for less than a year and no 6000 series is even announced.

They are the most popular cards on the market.

I hate Jensen.

I wish AMD could catch up. This monopoly is horrendous.
Posted on Reply
#44
Rover4444
TSiAhmatThe year of game optimization is here! (fr, ong)
Posted on Reply
#45
Bobaganoosh
I've been wondering when Nvidia would just stop making gaming graphics cards now that they're not a gaming or even graphics card company anymore (not primarily anyway) and we're such a small portion of their profits.

Also, no, there won't be a 6000 series until at least 2027 and that's if they decide it's even worth their time (come on bubble burst...come on...).
Posted on Reply
#46
Rover4444
BobaganooshI've been wondering when Nvidia would just stop making gaming graphics cards now that they're not a gaming or even graphics card company anymore (not primarily anyway) and we're such a small portion of their profits.

Also, no, there won't be a 6000 series until at least 2027 and that's if they decide it's even worth their time (come on bubble burst...come on...).
At worst they'll just release professional versions of their AI cards. VFX isn't going to just stop using CUDA and render farms can't use 100 series GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#47
Hecate91
Gooigi's ExIntel, this is your opening moment! DON’T F$#K IT UP!
Intel already f$%^ed up the B770 launch by not announcing anything at CES, even then it's too late, and their launches to market have been too late so far.
Now Intel likely can't get decent pricing on GDDR6, or allocate enough fab space, Intel would have to sell cards at a loss at this point to get any sales as people are probably losing interest in building or upgrading PC's because of all this AI BS.
LastDudeALiveRemoving an irrelevant feature to lower cost and complexity for consumers is good, actually.


Unfortunately, this is the pro-consumer move. AI is presenting massive price pressure on both VRAM and Blackwell chips. The "best" move for Nvidia (financially speaking) would be to just abandon consumer GPUs completely. Every consumer GPU represents a massive opportunity cost, compared to if that silicon and VRAM had gone into an AI chip instead.

The choice to focus on the most popular and lowest-cost SKUs (the 8GB and 12GB cards) is the best thing for the vast majority of consumers. It's very unfortunate for enthusiasts like us, who want and are willing to pay for higher-tier cards with more VRAM. But we are a small minority of the market. Nvidia has to make tough decisions about where to allocate their limited supply of chips and VRAM, and focusing on the most popular cards ensures that GPUs get to the most people possible.

Although I'd love to upgrade my GPU, I'd rather more people have the opportunity to get into PC gaming with a 5060 or 5070.
Ah yes, having less choices and features is always good for consumers. /s

The majority of consumers only having 8 and 12GB if they want an Nvidia card isn't good either, 8GB isn't enough and 12GB barely cuts it in newer titles, of course it's good for Nvidia though, as they can sell consumers a 6000 series card.
Posted on Reply
#48
sinomoon
I am so glad I built my PC and made my upgrades even when I questioned why I was doing it lmao. I bought a RTX 5070 FE when things were starting to show signs were starting to get worse back in November. I built my entire PC back in October 2024 when prices were at an all time low first hand, especially for top of the line NVMe drives.

32GB of DDR4 was only $40. The latest Samsung NVMe at that time was only $89 in 2024. If the RTX 3060 really does come back I'll call it a major win if it comes higher than $299; that's what I got my RTX 4060 for back in 2024.
Posted on Reply
#49
LastDudeALive
Hecate91Ah yes, having less choices and features is always good for consumers. /s
Good for the vast majority of consumers (who were the target market of the xx60 class GPUs), yes. Why should everyone have to pay for a feature that was irrelevant for 99% of gamers and 99% of games?
Hecate91The majority of consumers only having 8 and 12GB if they want an Nvidia card isn't good either, 8GB isn't enough and 12GB barely cuts it in newer titles, of course it's good for Nvidia though, as they can sell consumers a 6000 series card.
It's better for the entire gaming economy if as many people have GPUs as possible, even if those GPUs are 8GB or 12GB. That means more people buying and playing games.
Posted on Reply
#50
Dragam1337
LastDudeALiveRemoving an irrelevant feature to lower cost and complexity for consumers is good, actually.


Unfortunately, this is the pro-consumer move. AI is presenting massive price pressure on both VRAM and Blackwell chips. The "best" move for Nvidia (financially speaking) would be to just abandon consumer GPUs completely. Every consumer GPU represents a massive opportunity cost, compared to if that silicon and VRAM had gone into an AI chip instead.

The choice to focus on the most popular and lowest-cost SKUs (the 8GB and 12GB cards) is the best thing for the vast majority of consumers. It's very unfortunate for enthusiasts like us, who want and are willing to pay for higher-tier cards with more VRAM. But we are a small minority of the market. Nvidia has to make tough decisions about where to allocate their limited supply of chips and VRAM, and focusing on the most popular cards ensures that GPUs get to the most people possible.

Although I'd love to upgrade my GPU, I'd rather more people have the opportunity to get into PC gaming with a 5060 or 5070.
Funny how you keep saying "we" and "us", when you are part of the crowd that aint getting hit with your midrange gpu.

"Although I'd love to upgrade my GPU, I'd rather more people have the opportunity to get into PC gaming with a 5060 or 5070." Wauw what a surprise, the guy with a midrange gpu thinks it's fine that you can now only get a midrange gpu...
LastDudeALiveGood for the vast majority of consumers (who were the target market of the xx60 class GPUs), yes. Why should everyone have to pay for a feature that was irrelevant for 99% of gamers and 99% of games?


It's better for the entire gaming economy if as many people have GPUs as possible, even if those GPUs are 8GB or 12GB. That means more people buying and playing games.
Lol, were people forced to buy more than a x60 card previously ? No ? Then gtfo with that strawman argument...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 19:06 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts