Friday, January 16th 2026

NVIDIA Reportedly Ends GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Production, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Next

NVIDIA has reportedly stopped production of its mid-range GeForce RTX 5070 Ti graphics card, according to ASUS, one of the largest PC manufacturers. ASUS shared exclusive information with Hardware Unboxed, revealing that NVIDIA has created a supply shortage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, effectively ending its production. As one of NVIDIA's largest AIB partners, ASUS has learned that the model is essentially in end-of-life status. The company noted the supply shortage and offered no further comments on availability or potential improvements in supply. Since retailers and manufacturers can't source enough stock of the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GPUs, the shortage has led to significant price increases for these models and suggests that the future availability of this GPU SKU might be nonexistent.

Update 2, January 16, 08:30 UTC: ASUS issued an official public statement regarding the "incomplete" information about the RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti EOL.
ASUSWe would like to clarify recent reports regarding the ASUS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB. Certain media may have received incomplete information from an ASUS PR representative regarding these products. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB have not been discontinued or designated as end-of-life (EOL). ASUS has no plans to stop selling these models. Current fluctuations in supply for both products are primarily due to memory supply constraints, which have temporarily affected production output and restocking cycles. As a result, availability may appear limited in certain markets, but this should not be interpreted as a production halt or product retirement. ASUS will continue to support the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and is working closely with partners to stabilize supply as conditions improve.
Below is an older update and the remaining of the original text.

Update 1, 19:45 UTC: NVIDIA issued a statement to HardwareLuxx confirming that the series remains in production, but elevated demand is drying up the inventory.
NVIDIA to HardwareLuxxWhat changes are occurring in the GeForce ecosystem given the current memory market?
Demand for GeForce RTX GPUs is strong, and memory supply is constrained. We continue to ship all GeForce SKUs and are working closely with our suppliers to maximize memory availability.
The next phase of the silent production end is approaching for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB version, with resources reportedly being redirected to the lower-capacity GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB version. Stocks of the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB SKU have been dwindling across retailers and distributors, and prices are beginning to reflect this scarcity. The massive industry DRAM shortage has affected even graphics GDDR7 memory. As a result, the lower-capacity 8 GB version will remain available until the supply chain and memory production improve. Yesterday's rumors also confirm that the regular RTX 5060 will be the priority card for NVIDIA going forward, for that segment.

Additionally, ASUS provided information about the previously rumored CES launch of the RTX 50 "SUPER" refresh, which was expected to have higher memory capacity. According to the AIB, this launch did not occur, although the original plan was indeed for a CES launch, which was postponed. Currently, there are no plans to release a series refresh, and some AIBs have reportedly expressed frustration over the sudden change. It seems the rumor about the SUPER launch being postponed was true, with the primary reason being the shortage of high-capacity GDDR7 memory.
Source: Hardware Unboxed
Add your own comment

210 Comments on NVIDIA Reportedly Ends GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Production, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Next

#51
LastDudeALive
Dragam1337Funny how you keep saying "we" and "us", when you are part of the crowd that aint getting hit with your midrange gpu.

"Although I'd love to upgrade my GPU, I'd rather more people have the opportunity to get into PC gaming with a 5060 or 5070." Wauw what a surprise, the guy with a midrange gpu thinks it's fine that you can now only get a midrange gpu...
I'm sure it's very difficult for you to comprehend this, but there are some people who don't have the money for a 7800X3D and a 5090. I think those people should be able to play video games.
Posted on Reply
#52
Dragam1337
LastDudeALiveI'm sure it's very difficult for you to comprehend this, but there are some people who don't have the money for a 7800X3D and a 5090. I think those people should be able to play video games.
And there are plenty of options for them - reducing options solves absolutely nothing.
Posted on Reply
#53
JIWIL
Who knew buying a 4080 at launch for just under MSRP was a good idea... certainly didn't seem like it at the time.
Posted on Reply
#54
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
LastDudeALiveI'm sure it's very difficult for you to comprehend this, but there are some people who don't have the money for a 7800X3D and a 5090. I think those people should be able to play video games.
5060s are fine for gaming, truthfully. Lower the settings, stay off 4K and stick to 60FPS and you're fine. I never understood why high refresh rates became the default honestly.
JIWILWho knew buying a 4080 at launch for just under MSRP was a good idea... certainly didn't seem like it at the time.
It's almost always a good idea to buy the higher end cards, at least at or below MSRP.
Posted on Reply
#55
LastDudeALive
Dragam1337And there are plenty of options for them - reducing options solves absolutely nothing.
Do you not understand the current situation? The AI bubble is removing those options. There is no longer enough VRAM to meet all the demand from consumers and enterprises. Nvidia has to make tough choices on which segments to prioritize. With an extremely limited VRAM supply, they are making the choice to discontinue a couple enthusiast-focused SKUs and prioritize the most popular models, so that as many people as possible get GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#56
Paganstomp
Update 19:45 UTC: NVIDIA issued a statement for HardwareLuxx confirming that the series remains in production, but elevated demand is drying up the inventory.

Panic buying. Last time it was toilet paper and canned goods. :)
Posted on Reply
#57
Krit
JIWILWho knew buying a 4080 at launch for just under MSRP was a good idea... certainly didn't seem like it at the time.
RTX 3080 (high end) was 700$ with way bigger and more expensive die to produce than RTX 4080 (mid range) at 1200$.

RTX 30 Series last decent nvidia gpu generation.

R.I.P.

RTX 50 Series
RTX 60 Series
PaganstompNVIDIA issued a statement
The real statement is that RTX 5070 is already as expensive as RX 9070 for the first time ever.
Posted on Reply
#58
Youseethis
PaganstompUpdate 19:45 UTC: NVIDIA issued a statement for HardwareLuxx confirming that the series remains in production, but elevated demand is drying up the inventory.

Panic buying. Last time it was toilet paper and canned goods. :)
From asus via hardware unboxed there was also a correction. For asus their own models are basically eol, not by nvidia’s design, but by scarcity.

For consumers the results will be the same, won’t they? Cards will be expensive and hard to find. Correct?
Posted on Reply
#59
JIWIL
KritRTX 3080 (high end) was 700$ with way bigger and more expensive die to produce than RTX 4080 (mid range) at 1200$.

RTX 30 Series last decent nvidia gpu generation.

R.I.P.

RTX 50 Series
RTX 60 Series
Yeah, there were shelves full of 4080's for this reason, picked one up on sale (remember those?).
Posted on Reply
#60
zenlessyank
Relax guys, we will be gaming on Blackwells soon for $50 each. ECC ram will be cheep and standard and RAID drives will be plentiful and almost free!
Posted on Reply
#61
Dr. Dro
Dirt ChipAll is good people, all is good. Just keep breathing and remember- less is more and the more you buy the more you save.
All is good.
Thanks Jensen! Back to you, Steve.
GrimlingWith a new DLSS 4.6 Feature: "infinity AI memory", a new "AI-Powered" texture compression! "16gb of texture memory performance on your 5050 6gb"!
Trip down memory lane. As one of the (un)fortunate sons who had a pair of these, I reassure you that the claim R9 Fury X's 4 GB of HBM clearly matched Titan X's 12 GB of GDDR5 was provably true. AI not needed.
Gatt"the regular RTX 5060 will be the priority card for NVIDIA going forward" LOL
It makes sense, though. Realistically, it is probably the best selling SKU for a variety of reasons. Most affordable means high global volume, also sold in bulk through OEM channels, cyber cafes, etc. - this is the same reason AMD also made a 8 GB 9060 XT variant, and it's probably going to be selling quite well should anything happen to the supply of 16 GB models.

AMD's decision to use previous-generation G6 memory helped their case immensely here in regards to supply. Considered Nvidia supposedly restarted production on the RTX 3060, so there must be some level of supply of G6 left available, although how much is really the big question if you ask of me.
Posted on Reply
#62
evernessince
720p lowPretty sure if you slice that 5050 die just right, you can get two great 4Gb RTX cards from it. So, things aren't all bad...
I've got a gif of what that looks like for gamers:




Meanwhile the AI bros have so many GPUs they can't build datacenters quick enough to use them all.
Posted on Reply
#63
TheinsanegamerN
LastDudeALiveDo you not understand the current situation? The AI bubble is removing those options. There is no longer enough VRAM to meet all the demand from consumers and enterprises. Nvidia has to make tough choices on which segments to prioritize. With an extremely limited VRAM supply, they are making the choice to discontinue a couple enthusiast-focused SKUs and prioritize the most popular models, so that as many people as possible get GPUs.
That doesnt mean they are making MORE of them. You've fallen for the double-speak.

Reducing options for the consumer is not good for the consumer - period. Especially when they remove the 16GB 5060ti, you know, a more affordable card that has a much longer usable lifespan then one crippled by a VRAM allocation from 2014? Wow, how consumer friendly! Forcing people to either buy crippled 8GB GPUs or nothing at all isnt good for the market, no matter how you spin it.
Posted on Reply
#64
wolf
Better Than Native
Looks like from Nvidias perspective they are not EOL'ing any cards. Asus can't get enough to justify production, but that could be a them problem... Stay tuned?



It also begs the question.. A 5080 is a flawless GB203 die, surely they want to do something with the flawed ones.
Posted on Reply
#65
maxli86
Like some mention all these were due to AI boom thus causing DRAM shortage.
DRAM manufacturer are running short on supplies thus high price as well as limited stocks.
Followed by SSD which now face very high price and now GPU is next.
I just hope if Nvidia axe 16GB cards, please don't axe 8GB cards.
If this DRAM situation worse we may see 4GB or 6GB cards.
RTX 5030 4GB or RTX 5050 6GB variant which I do not want these appear.
Posted on Reply
#66
LastDudeALive
TheinsanegamerNThat doesnt mean they are making MORE of them. You've fallen for the double-speak.
If Nvidia has 16GB of GDDR7, they can make 1 5070-Ti or 2 5060s.

Anyway, we've got Nvidia's statement that they aren't discontinuing it after all, it seems to be a decision some AIB partners are making.
wolfIt also begs the question.. A 5080 is a flawless GB203 die, surely they want to do something with the flawed ones.
They can be turned into 5090 and 5080 mobiles. The 5090m is cut down by just a couple hundred CUDA cores, while the 5080m is cut down more than the 5070-Ti.
Posted on Reply
#67
Bobaganoosh
Rover4444At worst they'll just release professional versions of their AI cards. VFX isn't going to just stop using CUDA and render farms can't use 100 series GPUs.
Sure. They make money on all of them, but the biggest market is data-center and if they switch-over their TSMC allotment entirely to data-center, that maximizes profit. It's a terrible long-term business plan, but that didn't stop Micron from doing the same (axing Crucial entirely). I just don't think it's too far a stretch for Nvidia to (even if they claim it's only temporary) completely move all production to data-center customers. They don't need to sell RTX cards at all, to professionals or gamers.
Posted on Reply
#68
Dragam1337
wolfLooks like from Nvidias perspective they are not EOL'ing any cards. Asus can't get enough to justify production, but that could be a them problem... Stay tuned?



It also begs the question.. A 5080 is a flawless GB203 die, surely they want to do something with the flawed ones.
Yeah, cause nvidia was totally gonna admit to EOL their 2 most popular gpus... come on...
Posted on Reply
#69
Hxx
LastDudeALiveDo you not understand the current situation? The AI bubble is removing those options. There is no longer enough VRAM to meet all the demand from consumers and enterprises. Nvidia has to make tough choices on which segments to prioritize. With an extremely limited VRAM supply, they are making the choice to discontinue a couple enthusiast-focused SKUs and prioritize the most popular models, so that as many people as possible get GPUs.
Nvidia doesn’t terminate certain SKUs to prioritize more popular SKUs. They do it because certain SKUs have a much higher margin and those remain in production. There is a much bigger profit on a 5080 than on a 5070ti for example. The 5080 is literally twice as expensive with the same amount of vram . If they have to sell you 16GB of vram they will do so by selling the most expensive SKU they have . In other words they are killing the “value” options. From a business perspective it makes sense if you need to kill some SKUs
Posted on Reply
#70
Hecate91
LastDudeALiveGood for the vast majority of consumers (who were the target market of the xx60 class GPUs), yes. Why should everyone have to pay for a feature that was irrelevant for 99% of gamers and 99% of games?
It's only good for those who would settle for an 8GB card, SLI would be a nice feature right now when Nvidia just discontinued 2 of their popular GPU's, but no Nvidia doesn't want the average consumer to have more than 1 GPU in their PC.
LastDudeALiveIt's better for the entire gaming economy if as many people have GPUs as possible, even if those GPUs are 8GB or 12GB. That means more people buying and playing games.
Only better for Nvidia, an 8GB GPU is on the edge of being obsolete, 12GB is just enough for 1440p.
LastDudeALiveDo you not understand the current situation? The AI bubble is removing those options. There is no longer enough VRAM to meet all the demand from consumers and enterprises. Nvidia has to make tough choices on which segments to prioritize. With an extremely limited VRAM supply, they are making the choice to discontinue a couple enthusiast-focused SKUs and prioritize the most popular models, so that as many people as possible get GPUs.
An AI bubble caused by the AI salesman himself, if only Nvidia could do something with the trillions they have to alleviate the "shortage" they caused, what a tough situation when they've chosen to turn their backs on the gamers who built the company,lol.
LastDudeALiveIf Nvidia has 16GB of GDDR7, they can make 1 5070-Ti or 2 5060s.

Anyway, we've got Nvidia's statement that they aren't discontinuing it after all, it seems to be a decision some AIB partners are making.
Sure, because Nvidia would admit they're discontinuing GPU's that people may still consider buying.
Some AIB partners may not be able to allocate RAM, as Nvidia has stopped selling GPU+VRAM as a bundle, if Asus can't purchase GDDR7 then other AIBs are in trouble as well.
Posted on Reply
#71
cfenton
Hecate91So Nvidia buyers only have the 5060 8GB, 5070 12GB, or for those willing to spend $1300-1400 on a GPU a 5080.
Seems like AMD using GDDR6 wasn't a bad thing like some were insisting, keeping prices down while performance isn't significantly worse.
I haven't seen any evidence that the type of memory makes a significant difference. The wafers are expensive, regardless of what you want to use them for. Maybe if they could make GDDR6 on some ancient process it would help, but I don't think that's the case.
Posted on Reply
#72
Dragam1337
cfentonI haven't seen any evidence that the type of memory makes a significant difference. The wafers are expensive, regardless of what you want to use them for. Maybe if they could make GDDR6 on some ancient process it would help, but I don't think that's the case.
Gddr7 is the primary reason that the 5060 ti is 15% faster than 4060 ti.
Posted on Reply
#73
LastDudeALive
Hecate91It's only good for those who would settle for an 8GB card,
So, the majority of customers, yeah.
Hecate91SLI would be a nice feature right now when Nvidia just discontinued 2 of their popular GPU's, but no Nvidia doesn't want the average consumer to have more than 1 GPU in their PC.
The 5060 can get you ~4k60 with DLSS while maintaining good image quality with the new 2nd gen Transformer model. That's better than the flagship GPUs like the 1080-Ti could provide when they came out. If you want high frame rates, you can turn on FG. There's just absolutely no justification for SLI.
Hecate91Only better for Nvidia, an 8GB GPU is on the edge of being obsolete, 12GB is just enough for 1440p.
Funny enough, AMD and Nvidia keep making them, and people keep buying them. You live in a bubble.
Posted on Reply
#74
Rover4444
BobaganooshSure. They make money on all of them, but the biggest market is data-center and if they switch-over their TSMC allotment entirely to data-center, that maximizes profit. It's a terrible long-term business plan, but that didn't stop Micron from doing the same (axing Crucial entirely). I just don't think it's too far a stretch for Nvidia to (even if they claim it's only temporary) completely move all production to data-center customers. They don't need to sell RTX cards at all, to professionals or gamers.
I think they'd definitely need to sell to professionals at least. Enterprise customers would absolutely riot if they didn't get CUDA, NVIDIA would just be leaving money on the table. They also need to keep producing gaming GPUs even if they're not selling them to keep GFN afloat, that's a cash cow.
LastDudeALiveYou live in a bubble.
Yeah, the AI bubble where 8GB GPUs are the norm for yet another gen because the entire supply of DRAM for this year just got allocated this month.
Posted on Reply
#75
cinemaware
evernessinceI've got a gif of what that looks like for gamers:




Meanwhile the AI bros have so many GPUs they can't build datacenters quick enough to use them all.
Is there a gif which could demonstrate the hypocrisy and crocodile tears people ITT are shedding over 5070Ti? Because I seem to recall that when Blackwell came out it was declared to be overpriced, backwards, fakeframed moneygrab scam, or something to that effect.

It's amazing how easily people can lose their minds over a rumour that predictably turned out be a lot of hot air from, predictably, Hardware Unboxed. But they got their clicks and the believers their narrative reinforced, so it's all good I guess.

Really, if you read some of the more outlandish conspiracies here, like the one where Nvidia kills the Ti to push 5080, it's pure comedy. Do you really think that a trillion $ company which is now all about AI would have time for such silly games, to earn what from this genius gambit...a few million maybe? Gimme a break.

Now, if you hate AI, then sure, it is the real reason for the scarcity. I hate this situation too, but also am aware of the fact that if it was me in the driving seat of a huge corpo in a capitalist system, I would absolutely do the same. You'd be mad not to prioritize your resources this way when being at the forefront of one of possibly greatest advances in tech in decades, if not centuries.

And AI really has the possibility to be just that. I'm not a great fan myself and if I could switch it off forever I probably would. But there’s no denying that if it realizes even a fraction of what the plans are, it'll be a seismic shift. It will be most likely for the worse for most of us (just like the internet turned out to be) but it's also a fact that humanity is sort of stuck at the moment when it comes to tech advances in general. And our long term survival prognosis doesn't look too rosy. If AI could help to propel us in some new directions, then at least that would count for something.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 19:06 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts