Tuesday, February 17th 2026

Hardware Unboxed Examines "Cheaper" CXMT IC-based KingBank KFRW DDR5-6000 CL36 Kit

Last week, computer memory industry observers noted the US Government's "very brief" removal of ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) from a trade blacklist. In early 2026, leading North American OEMs were reported as seeking alternative suppliers of consumer-grade DDR5 and DDR4 memory. China's CXMT seems to be an ideal frontrunner for brands that are currently struggling with procurements of more mainstream modules—as produced by Micron, SK hynix, and Samsung. Australia's Hardware Unboxed is in a fortunate geographical position; where CXMT IC-based kits are (kind of) readily available via big box stores. The ongoing "DDR pricing nightmare" has prompted Steve Walton's recent purchase of a cheaper KingBank KFRW DDR5-6000 CL36 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) White RGB kit. The KFRW range seems to be an Aussie market exclusive, derived from KingBank's Soarblade UDIMM product family.

Primarily, Walton compared this less familiar Chinese brand set to a "sweet spot" G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 CL30 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) kit. Prior to the present-day crisis, this former price-to-performance champ was available as low as $115 in North America. Fast-forward to February 2026, and the kit's price tag has reached a $490 high. A few weeks ago, Walton managed to pick up one of the cheapest KingBank kits, that happened to feature CXMT's homegrown modules—he did not disclose how much was forked over for review candidate ownership. Today's Hardware Unboxed investigative video notes that KingBank prices have increased around the mid-February period—Australians have to pay a minimum of AU$649 (~$458 USD) for currently in-stock CMXT-based sticks. Curiously, a screenshot of Mwave store listings shows a KingBank Hynix M-die-based kit being sold for a relatively reasonable AU$599 (~$423 USD). Overall, Walton recommends that locals pick up Chinese-made DRAM, if price tags are reasonable.
The tested KingBank KFRW kit delivered almost the same level of performance as the "sweet spot" G.Skill reference model, at least on Hardware Unboxed's AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 evaluation platform. In terms of game frame rates, Team Red's 3D V-Cache-augmented gaming processor performance are less sensitive to differences in memory speeds.
Hardware Unboxed's video description: "is this (KingBank/CXMT memory) the solution to crazy DDR5 prices?

Sources: Hardware Unboxed YouTube Channel, VideoCardz, MWave Australia (KingBank product listing), G.Skill Product Page
Add your own comment

24 Comments on Hardware Unboxed Examines "Cheaper" CXMT IC-based KingBank KFRW DDR5-6000 CL36 Kit

#1
jesdals
Now that both Stevens has put focus CXM - we can only hope that they are more willing to raise production than the big 3. Would have liked to se some AIDA64 latency and scores as well as performance / possibility for pushing timings etc. but nice with more competition in the Memory area
Posted on Reply
#2
blacksea76
If these would come with at least 10yr warranty and a good price/performance ratio it would be a very good alternative to the ones from the big three greedy companies. And it would help the Chinese catch up with their technology faster. More competition is always good to have.
Posted on Reply
#3
ZoneDymo
jesdalsNow that both Stevens has put focus CXM - we can only hope that they are more willing to raise production than the big 3. Would have liked to se some AIDA64 latency and scores as well as performance / possibility for pushing timings etc. but nice with more competition in the Memory area
im sure now that both Steve's have given attention CXM will start working a lot harder, they were slacking before but this will have given them the boost/motivation they needed!
Posted on Reply
#4
maxli86
blacksea76If these would come with at least 10yr warranty and a good price/performance ratio it would be a very good alternative to the ones from the big three greedy companies. And it would help the Chinese catch up with their technology faster. More competition is always good to have.
I agree, my concern is the RMA process.
How is it like, when you send it in how long it will take.
Posted on Reply
#5
Hecate91
Good performance, but not really a solution unless Chinese companies flood the market enough to bring prices down.
Posted on Reply
#6
sam_86314
jesdalsNow that both Stevens has put focus CXM - we can only hope that they are more willing to raise production than the big 3. Would have liked to se some AIDA64 latency and scores as well as performance / possibility for pushing timings etc. but nice with more competition in the Memory area
Maybe I'm way too pessimistic, but as much as I'd love to see CXMT disrupt the market, I think they're more likely to just join the cartel and the big 3 turn into the big 4.
Posted on Reply
#7
TheinsanegamerN
jesdalsNow that both Stevens has put focus CXM - we can only hope that they are more willing to raise production than the big 3. Would have liked to se some AIDA64 latency and scores as well as performance / possibility for pushing timings etc. but nice with more competition in the Memory area
CXMT is forecasting that they will be going from 4% to 12% marketshare within 2 years, so at minimum they are predicting they will triple production.

Their limitation is going to be the lithography equipment. Production of that needs to ramp up first.
Posted on Reply
#8
twin_savage
TheinsanegamerNCXMT is forecasting that they will be going from 4% to 12% marketshare within 2 years, so at minimum they are predicting they will triple production.
I'm not sure that's a safe assumption if the big 3 are pulling back from the consumer discreet DRAM market for customers that will pay them better; it might be that CXMT is even reducing production but still gaining marketshare in this segment. After all CXMT said they are going to shift a large portion of their capacity exclusively to HBM starting in 2026.


I'd be real interested to see what the power consumption of these CXMT modules are, they are running a significantly larger process node than the big 3's DRAM.
Posted on Reply
#9
Makaveli
X3D chips not needing super fast ram really helps in todays current market.
Posted on Reply
#10
jesdals
Wizard@ Hope that You can get some modules for indept testing - e.g. overclocking / timing potential, powerusage - Hardware Unboxed did report high temps - but it would be interesting to see some more testing.
Posted on Reply
#11
AGlezB
If CXMT plays their cards right they'll eat everyone's lunch.
Posted on Reply
#12
Chaitanya
maxli86I agree, my concern is the RMA process.
How is it like, when you send it in how long it will take.
Wont be any worse than Corsair who require you to spend time on "AI" chatbot even to generate a ticket after which you need to send the faulty DRAM kit all the way to Taiwan through post.
Posted on Reply
#13
MondoMike
MakaveliX3D chips not needing super fast ram really helps in todays current market.
True, but it's too bad new gen x3d aren't affordable and more expensive that 90% of the CPU market. Also, most CPU's don't need fast memory just some chips perform significantly better at higher speeds than others. Intel scales VERY well with high speeds and AMD typically doesn't. It is nicer on the pocket in the current ram market though I agree.
Posted on Reply
#14
Makaveli
MondoMikeTrue, but it's too bad new gen x3d aren't affordable and more expensive that 90% of the CPU market. Also, most CPU's don't need fast memory just some chips perform significantly better at higher speeds than others. Intel scales VERY well with high speeds and AMD typically doesn't. It is nicer on the pocket in the current ram market though I agree.
The 7600X3D cost this much in Canada right now so its not a bad start.

Posted on Reply
#15
MondoMike
MakaveliThe 7600X3D cost this much in Canada right now so its not a bad start.

Yah it's not a bad chip and good for L3 cache games, here in the States you can only get it at a reasonable price at a Microcenter which is In-store only. I think Microcenter sells it on Amazon but its the same price as yours but in USD which is horrible value. There are an underwhelming amount of reviews on the chip and most I've seen put it on par with the 14600k. Which for a while was under $200 in the $150-$175 range last year.
Posted on Reply
#16
TumbleGeorge
blacksea76If these would come with at least 10yr warranty and a good price/performance ratio it would be a very good alternative to the ones from the big three greedy companies. And it would help the Chinese catch up with their technology faster. More competition is always good to have.
I'm not sure the warranty period of Western companies is realistic. Have you ever received an RMA after 10 years for your RAM?
Posted on Reply
#17
TheinsanegamerN
twin_savageI'm not sure that's a safe assumption if the big 3 are pulling back from the consumer discreet DRAM market for customers that will pay them better; it might be that CXMT is even reducing production but still gaining marketshare in this segment. After all CXMT said they are going to shift a large portion of their capacity exclusively to HBM starting in 2026.


I'd be real interested to see what the power consumption of these CXMT modules are, they are running a significantly larger process node than the big 3's DRAM.
The marketshare represents global DRAM shipment, not just consumer sales.

they're actively building new fabs right now. Should the cartel decide to further reduce production for some bizarre reason, the higher prices will only further drive Chinese expansion.

They're playing with fire and I hope they get burned real good. The Chinese expansion may finally achieve what government fines and investigations never could: break up the cartel.
Posted on Reply
#18
R0H1T
jesdalsNow that both Stevens has put focus CXM - we can only hope that they are more willing to raise production than the big 3. Would have liked to se some AIDA64 latency and scores as well as performance / possibility for pushing timings etc. but nice with more competition in the Memory area
Dealing with Chinese (Taiwanese as well?) component makers is more of a political issue than anything else! Also be careful what you wish for ~ eventually if you allow a certain brand, or country, to be too big to fail they'll do the same shens as the current incumbents!

IMO we're entering an era where price/margin caps are now a must to check this kind of a behavior!
TheinsanegamerNthey're actively building new fabs right now. Should the cartel decide to further reduce production for some bizarre reason, the higher prices will only further drive Chinese expansion.

They're playing with fire and I hope they get burned real good. The Chinese expansion may finally achieve what government fines and investigations never could: break up the cartel.
Why do you bring this up? It's not like the retailers didn't jack up prices, of everything, during peak Covid or the last 3(4?) crypto booms!
Posted on Reply
#19
twin_savage
TheinsanegamerNThe marketshare represents global DRAM shipment, not just consumer sales.

they're actively building new fabs right now. Should the cartel decide to further reduce production for some bizarre reason, the higher prices will only further drive Chinese expansion.
If we're talking global DRAM shipments then the big 3 aren't contracting, they are expanding their DRAM shipments much faster than CXMT while constructing more new fabs than CXMT is.

HBM is included in total DRAM shipment figures, and cannot be readily used by consumers which is where some of the supply-demand mismatch is coming from.
Posted on Reply
#20
TumbleGeorge
twin_savagethey are expanding their DRAM shipments much faster than CXMT
What? Proof that! Moar incomes come from increase prices not from increasing shipment.
Posted on Reply
#21
twin_savage
TumbleGeorgeWhat? Proof that! Moar incomes come from increase prices not from increasing shipment.
Combine the information from these two report:
newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/memory-mania-how-a-once-in-four-decades
www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20250902-12694.html
and you'll see the total gigabytes shipped is increasing and that the market share by capacity is shifting toward the western producers and away from CXMT.

If you've got an account with trendforce you can get more up-to-date information and not have to piece it together yourself from multiple reports.

I understand people want to be pessimistic about the market but just because the memory maker's revenue is increasing doesn't mean they are reducing output and raising prices; they are allowed to increase output and still have the prices go up because so many are clamoring to buy the memory.
Posted on Reply
#22
TumbleGeorge
twin_savageCombine the information from these two report:
newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/memory-mania-how-a-once-in-four-decades
www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20250902-12694.html
and you'll see the total gigabytes shipped is increasing and that the market share by capacity is shifting toward the western producers and away from CXMT.

If you've got an account with trendforce you can get more up-to-date information and not have to piece it together yourself from multiple reports.

I understand people want to be pessimistic about the market but just because the memory maker's revenue is increasing doesn't mean they are reducing output and raising prices; they are allowed to increase output and still have the prices go up because so many are clamoring to buy the memory.
The gigabytes delivered is a function of higher capacity chips, not a greater number of chips.
Posted on Reply
#23
twin_savage
TumbleGeorgeThe gigabytes delivered is a function of higher capacity chips, not a greater number of chips.
This is true, however measuring DRAM by number of packages shipped regardless of capacity isn't a useful metric.
and going back to consumer memory, the DIMMs we use can have anywhere from 4 to 80 DRAM packages on them further reducing the utility of trying to count memory output by packages shipped rather than capacity shipped.
Posted on Reply
#24
TheinsanegamerN
R0H1TWhy do you bring this up?
Because it is part of an ongoing conversation within this thread
R0H1TIt's not like the retailers didn't jack up prices, of everything, during peak Covid or the last 3(4?) crypto booms!
Major difference: 1) memory was not the crux of any of those booms. Those were GPU shortages, or in Red Lungs case, major transportation shutdowns combined with an absurd growth in demand. GPUs are far harder to build competitors to, and to this day China is still pretty far behind in this field.

It should be noted that the Chinese have made major strides int he last few years on GPU manufacturing as well, partially driven by shutdown demand.

2) none of those shortages resulted in lower production. nvidia/AMD were hammering TSMC for every wafer they could get, and TSMC was opening up new facilities as fast as they could.

Meanwhile, in this case, we have the memory cartel actively shutting down production of DDR4 and idling lines of DDR5 as demand surges, creating artificial supply shortages. Previously they have not done this.

So yeah, apples and oranges.
twin_savageThis is true, however measuring DRAM by number of packages shipped regardless of capacity isn't a useful metric.
and going back to consumer memory, the DIMMs we use can have anywhere from 4 to 80 DRAM packages on them further reducing the utility of trying to count memory output by packages shipped rather than capacity shipped.
Its arguably much more useful then GB shipped. DDR5 is double the average capacity of DDR4 sticks, so comparing to, sa, 5 years ago, if GB shipped is up by 20% that could easily mean they are shipping fewer actual sticks of RAM, even though the GB shipped increased.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 04:07 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts