Wednesday, October 21st 2026

Leak: Intel Core Ultra 9 4995HX Leads Nova Lake Laptop Lineup

Intel's Core Ultra 9 4995HX looks set to be the fastest Nova Lake chip for laptops. Leaker Jaykihn on X has confirmed that the 4995HX uses an 8+16+4+2 layout, meaning 8 P-cores, 16 E-cores, 4 LPE cores, and 2 Xe3 GPU cores. That adds up to 28 CPU cores, four more than Intel's current Arrow Lake-HX chips, with the extra cores coming from the LPE cluster Arrow Lake-HX lacked. The overall layout matches the 8P+16E+4LP ceiling earlier reports pointed to, and the name itself fits the Core Ultra 4000 branding said to be extending to HX parts. Intel hasn't confirmed any of this, and clocks, cache, and power figures are still unknown.

The same post lists the Core Ultra 9 4970H as 4+8+4+12, so 16 CPU cores and a 12-core Xe3P iGPU. That is the same core count as Panther Lake's flagship Core Ultra X9 388H, so any gains here should come from the new Coyote Cove P-cores, Arctic Wolf E-cores, and Xe3P graphics rather than extra cores. The tiny iGPU on the 4995HX is less of a concern, since HX chips almost always end up paired with a discrete GPU anyway. Jaykihn also put the final 8+16 HX compute tile, built on TSMC N2P, at 14.8 x 6.6 mm, or roughly 98 mm², shortly after die shots of both chips surfaced. Current reports point to the first Nova Lake-H and HX laptops showing up around CES 2027, though that timing should be treated as tentative for now.
Sources: Jaykihn on X, via Wccftech
Add your own comment

5 Comments on Leak: Intel Core Ultra 9 4995HX Leads Nova Lake Laptop Lineup

#1
jesdals
Looking forward to these
Posted on Reply
#2
XeonsNOpterons
I am still going to wait until launch for the actual nodes, but regardless, 98mm2 is impressive. If you converted the die area used by E-cores to more Coyote Cove P-cores, you could fit about 14.5 which puts the core area density nearly exactly equal to Zen 6 CCDs.
Posted on Reply
#3
MikOnTopGG
This naming system still looks weird. I don't know why they can't stick to one thing like AMD has.
Posted on Reply
#4
konataVT
8+16 is such a common config these days, although it makes alot of sense it does feel like stagnation a little
Posted on Reply
#5
tsurugi
MikOnTopGGThis naming system still looks weird. I don't know why they can't stick to one thing like AMD has.
It is because amd actively imitated intel's naming that intel was passively forced to switch to a new naming in order to distinguish itself from amd. In this naming change, because amd updated its naming, the past ryzen 7 7840h ish was modified to ryzen ai 9 hx370 ish, which is very close to intel's core ultra 9 285h. This time intel changed to core ultra 4000 instead of continuing to use core ultra 400.
Posted on Reply
Nov 11th, 2026 04:10 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts