Saturday, October 17th 2026

Intel Core Ultra 4000 Naming Reportedly Extends to "Nova Lake-HX" Mobile Processors

Intel's "new" four-digit Core Ultra 4000 naming apparently isn't limited to desktop chips. Prominent leaker Jaykihn says on X that "Nova Lake-HX" laptop processors will use the same four-number format, while H-series and suffix-less mobile chips continue with the three-digit naming of the previous generation. The clarification follows a leaked list of seven "Nova Lake-S" desktop processors that showed names like Core Ultra 9 4970K BFC and Core Ultra 7 4870K BFC. In that list, the BFC suffix seems to mark the models with bLLC (big last-level cache). As for the mobile versions, HX chips have traditionally been BGA versions of Intel's desktop silicon, so it looks like Intel is grouping them with Nova Lake-S instead of the other laptop chips. Those would presumably fall under Core Ultra 400, although Jaykihn didn't name the series.

The HX claim isn't entirely new, either. When the Core Ultra 9 4950K surfaced in a CPU-Z leak in August, leaker Golden Pig Upgrade had already mentioned Core Ultra 4000HX naming for laptops. Jaykihn also seems to have cleared up one detail from the desktop list. Apparently, the non-BFC models keep their four LPE cores, even though the leaked table didn't show them for every SKU. We haven't seen any HX model names yet, and Intel hasn't confirmed the naming change. Nova Lake-S qualification samples are already showing up in HWiNFO, and reports point to an early 2027 launch. As if Nova Lake-S reusing Haswell's 4000-series numbering wasn't enough, laptop buyers will probably have to deal with two naming schemes in one generation.

Update Oct 17th: Leaker Jaykihn has now retracted part of that statement. Apparently, H-series and suffix-less Nova Lake Mobile CPUs also utilize the four-number "Ultra 4000" naming scheme.
Sources: Jaykihn on X, via Videocardz
Add your own comment

14 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 4000 Naming Reportedly Extends to "Nova Lake-HX" Mobile Processors

#1
Let3r
I am so confused. 😆 Just do what AMD is doing with Ryzen naming.
Posted on Reply
#2
Six_Times
Excellent. I am in need of a new laptop.
Posted on Reply
#3
dllm
can I have a new 4790k to replace my 4790k?
Posted on Reply
#4
phints
Imagine if Intel just called it a Nova Lake i7 so people actually understood what chip it was...
Posted on Reply
#5
soder
and somehow, the expansion on what the BFC should mean, was left to the readers imagination ;) IYKYK
Posted on Reply
#6
jesdals
Let3rI am so confused. 😆 Just do what AMD is doing with Ryzen naming.
To be fair AMD laptop processor nameing has been awfull for years. And nameing is newer logical on hardware - recent years 8 and 16GB GPU models with the same name etc.

I am looking forward to some Thunderbolt 5 laptops soon
Posted on Reply
#7
claylomax
Intel pulling an AMD naming scheme. 😂
Posted on Reply
#8
kazuviking
I hope its working like the 13 gen mutants where on a simple interposer it can be used in normal mobo.
Posted on Reply
#9
randomdude9182
Six_TimesExcellent. I am in need of a new laptop.
Zen6 will be more efficient. Oh wait already is (see 3nm budget chip performing 33% better than the ryzen 9 mobile)
Posted on Reply
#10
konataVT
Let3rI am so confused. 😆 Just do what AMD is doing with Ryzen naming.
dude ryzen has a terrible naming scheme. "AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D" thats weird as heck. also X3D2? like its getting messy. remember, before the intel core series, they had the E8400 and the Q6600, i find most naming is pretty bad.
Posted on Reply
#11
r00tcz
Is it that hard to come up with naming scheme that's new and haven't been used before?
Posted on Reply
#12
AntiX3DGlazer
randomdude9182Zen6 will be more efficient. Oh wait already is (see 3nm budget chip performing 33% better than the ryzen 9 mobile)
Strix gets slapped around by Panther Lake.
Posted on Reply
#13
Squared
Wait why is Haswell back? Is it 2013 again?
Posted on Reply
#14
randomdude9182
AntiX3DGlazerStrix gets slapped around by Panther Lake.
Yes because of 18A(basically Inbetween n3 and n2) whereas strix halo is on 4nm, duhhhh. Intel gets too much crap for thier fabs and not nearly enough crap on this forum for thier architecture. they have low yields but their actual transistor performance when a yelid actually works is highly competitive. A18 is roughly n2 performance, so ofc they beat a chip on, in thier own words, "ancient silicon" by sheer node advantage.
The sky is blue no shit Buddy.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:39 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts