Saturday, October 17th 2026

PS6 RAM and Storage Alone Reportedly Cost Sony Over $680, Claims Leaker

The memory crunch looks like it is hitting the PlayStation 6 harder than expected. Hardware leaker KeplerL2 claims on NeoGAF that the RAM and NAND flash storage in Sony's next console alone cost over $680. He posted it as a reply to a forum member who floated $680 as a possible subsidized retail price, which pretty much puts that idea to rest. Keep in mind that figure covers only memory and storage, before the APU, cooling, power supply, and the rest of the hardware are counted. This is not the first time Kepler has updated his estimate. Back in March, he put the console's bill of materials at around $760, and by July, that had climbed to roughly $960.

Current leaks suggest the PS6 uses GDDR7 memory on a 160-bit bus with support for up to 40 GB, with 30 GB considered the more likely configuration. There have also been reports that Sony looked into cutting memory capacity to keep costs down, and the culprit is the same as everywhere else: AI data centers are soaking up DRAM and NAND supply, which pushes prices up for everyone. Sony has said nothing official about PS6 pricing, so it's reasonable to treat all of this with some caution. That said, if memory prices stay where they are, a PS6 that costs significantly more than the PS5 Pro seems likely, and a $1,000 price tag now looks quite possible.
Source: KeplerL2 on NeoGAF
Add your own comment

46 Comments on PS6 RAM and Storage Alone Reportedly Cost Sony Over $680, Claims Leaker

#26
Tek-Check
Consumer devices will get even more expensive due to AI data centres sucking up almost all capacity.

Crisis in consumer market of tech world is just one symptom of wider economic and societal issues.

There are already hundreds of thousands of protesters across several European countries, protesting against bad conditions in education, lack of opportunities, cost of living crisis, housing crisis, and more. Issues are compounding and younger generation can smell inequality, corruption and how the game was rigged against their current lives and their future.
Posted on Reply
#27
Jconnor1984
uplink777I apologize for my long rant upfront, but this article hit my sore spot on a philosophical level.

I love how we're discussing hypotheticals about a hypothetical PS6 and its hypothetical $680 memory and storage costs while, in my opinion, much of the collective West is facing a very real economic, industrial and potentially existential crisis. Seriously, guys, I see two things here that I consider borderline pathological.

First, do we even need a PS6 at this time (or a near-future time frame)?
I'm not convinced we need or are getting besides a paper launch another console generation within the next five years, or perhaps even the next decade. The hardware development paradigm has shifted considerably. The same applies to GPUs, memory, storage and gaming hardware in general. Generational improvements are becoming prohibitively expensive, while the practical benefits don't justify the enormous resources required.

And I'm sorry to say this on a computer hardware forum of all places, but perhaps we should temporarily stop obsessing over the next piece of silicon and focus on something considerably more important and that is our economic and industrial survival. We should be squeezing substantially more out of the hardware we already have through software development, optimisation and better utilisation of existing resources. We don't have unlimited time, electricity, energy infrastructure, manufacturing capacity, raw materials or access to critical components anymore. And pretending otherwise won't magically manufacture another million GPUs for us gamers. They all go to military/Ai atm anyways.

Second, I think we're seriously underestimating how fragile our entire technological supply chain has become.
I'm not Michael Pachter with a crystal ball ๐Ÿ”ฎ, and I'm certainly not claiming to know exactly what will happen. But whether we're discussing an RTX 6090, RTX 8090, PS6 or the next Xbox, I genuinely question whether these products will be available in anything resembling the quantities and at the prices we've grown accustomed to over the past decade. We're already dealing with extraordinary pricing pressures, geopolitical fragmentation, energy constraints and increasingly complicated global supply chains. These problems cannot necessarily be resolved by flipping a switch.

Even if international trade and economic relations somehow returned to their pre2019 conditions tomorrow, rebuilding disrupted supply chains, industrial capacity and strategic reserves could still take years. Potentially many years. I'm genuinely concerned that the next decade will be defined less by exciting generational upgrades and more by availability, affordability, repairability and making existing hardware last considerably longer. Perhaps I'm being overly pessimistic. I sincerely hope so. But that brings me back to these articles. We're speculating about the hypothetical manufacturing costs of hypothetical hardware in a future market whose conditions we cannot meaningfully predict. That's speculation built on speculation built on speculation.

I see it as a clickbait, nothing more, nothing less.

I would much rather see manufacturers invest their resources into software optimisation, extending hardware lifespans and improving what we already own, rather than endlessly pushing another generation of increasingly expensive products into an increasingly uncertain market. We already have tremendous hardware and thousands of games worth playing. Nobody needs an RTX 8090 or a PS6 to enjoy gaming.

And yes, I realise how ridiculous it sounds to suggest slowing down hardware development on TechPowerUp, especially coming from someone who loves enthusiast hardware as much as I do ๐Ÿ˜… But priorities matter. At this point we find ourselves in, we might have to accept that the next great technological achievement isn't necessarily building something faster.

It might simply be learning how to keep what we've already built running. Sorry for my long rant once more, I just got provoked by this article like a prawn (pun intended).

P.S.: Just s little reality check for all of us guys. The RTX 5090 that's suppose to cost 1999USD, I never gotten below 3000e, now costs 8000 - 12000 euros. I meam come on. Give it a break System!
Mate, UE5 and Raytransing...you got an answer why we do need new console gen...
Posted on Reply
#28
Guwapo77
There are a lot of delusional people thinking that RAM prices are a hoax and that these non RAM making companies have the ability to get the hardware whole sale. Why in the hell would RAM companies sell it to Sony/Apple/etc whole sale when they can sell it to data centers for X fold more?

Back to the story at hand... Sony and Microsoft should extend the current generation.
Posted on Reply
#29
uplink777
Jconnor1984Mate, UE5 and Raytransing...you got an answer why we do need new console gen...
Sure mate, I'm all for UE5 and ray tracing. But who's going to afford the hardware needed to run all that at ultra settings? A few thousand enthusiasts? That won't finance an entire console generation. I have 48 GB of ultra high-end RAM and an RTX 5090, and I've seen what UE5 titles like Wukong can do to that hardware ๐Ÿ˜…

Now imagine delivering comparable visuals on an affordable console amid skyrocketing memory costs and supply constraints. I doubt it'll be commercially viable anytime soon, perhaps not for another 5โ€“10 years. For now, optimisation should be the priority. FSR, DLSS where supported, frame generation and squeezing more out of existing hardware.

Let's make better use of what we already have before chasing another generation of silicon, what do You say bud?
Posted on Reply
#30
Hyrel
Solaris17Anyone that thinks these companies pay what we do are trolling.
Normally they don't, but with demand as high as it is today I doubt they're getting as much of a discount as they used to.
Posted on Reply
#31
uplink777
Guwapo77There are a lot of delusional people thinking that RAM prices are a hoax and that these non RAM making companies have the ability to get the hardware whole sale. Why in the hell would RAM companies sell it to Sony/Apple/etc whole sale when they can sell it to data centers for X fold more?

Back to the story at hand... Sony and Microsoft should extend the current generation.
Exactly mate. Here's an example from Slovakia. VAT on certain food products was reduced, yet grocery prices barely moved, and some even increased. The same applies to hardware. A company buys scarce materials at X, but instead of selling at X ร— 1.1, as before, it charges X ร— 2 or even X ร— 5. Why? Because it can. Every link in the supply chain has an incentive to maximise its margins, mainly at a time of global shortage. They know they won't be able to sell more of the article anymore, since it's scarce.

So it's not just manufacturing costs, shortages or datacenter demand. It's also good old human greed. Under scarcity, prices can escalate disproportionately, sometimes exponentially rather than linearly.

And guess who ultimately pays the bill? ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ
Posted on Reply
#32
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
HyrelNormally they don't, but with demand as high as it is today I doubt they're getting as much of a discount as they used to.
Talk about moving goal posts from โ€œthey pay what we pay.โ€

Makes sense though lots of gamers here
Posted on Reply
#33
tsurugi
Some people here do not realize that prices are rising due to increased demand and supply shortages, and increasing supply is the only way to solve supply shortages. Meanwhile, price increases allow DRAM producers to make a lot of money, basically enabling the people in the world who are most capable of producing DRAM to get the most money to enhance their ability to increase supply. We call this the market mechanism, which is basically the best way to solve supply shortages.
Posted on Reply
#34
mikesg
The PS6 is $1500 worth of hardware, easily. Not exactly console price, but it's long lasting and preserves it's own value.
Posted on Reply
#35
Grimling
uplink777I love how we're discussing hypotheticals about a hypothetical PS6 and its hypothetical $680 memory and storage costs while, in my opinion, much of the collective West is facing a very real economic, industrial and potentially existential crisis.
True. The ironic part is, most people who cry about high memory and GPU prices now, will be clueless in 2027/2028 when they stand in front of the empty supermarket, that sells the last 10 bread for what a High end GPU used to cost in 2015...
Posted on Reply
#36
Bigshrimp
uplink777I apologize for my long rant upfront, but this article hit my sore spot on a philosophical level.

I love how we're discussing hypotheticals about a hypothetical PS6 and its hypothetical $680 memory and storage costs while, in my opinion, much of the collective West is facing a very real economic, industrial and potentially existential crisis. Seriously, guys, I see two things here that I consider borderline pathological.

First, do we even need a PS6 at this time (or a near-future time frame)?
I'm not convinced we need or are getting besides a paper launch another console generation within the next five years, or perhaps even the next decade. The hardware development paradigm has shifted considerably. The same applies to GPUs, memory, storage and gaming hardware in general. Generational improvements are becoming prohibitively expensive, while the practical benefits don't justify the enormous resources required.

And I'm sorry to say this on a computer hardware forum of all places, but perhaps we should temporarily stop obsessing over the next piece of silicon and focus on something considerably more important and that is our economic and industrial survival. We should be squeezing substantially more out of the hardware we already have through software development, optimisation and better utilisation of existing resources. We don't have unlimited time, electricity, energy infrastructure, manufacturing capacity, raw materials or access to critical components anymore. And pretending otherwise won't magically manufacture another million GPUs for us gamers. They all go to military/Ai atm anyways.

Second, I think we're seriously underestimating how fragile our entire technological supply chain has become.
I'm not Michael Pachter with a crystal ball ๐Ÿ”ฎ, and I'm certainly not claiming to know exactly what will happen. But whether we're discussing an RTX 6090, RTX 8090, PS6 or the next Xbox, I genuinely question whether these products will be available in anything resembling the quantities and at the prices we've grown accustomed to over the past decade. We're already dealing with extraordinary pricing pressures, geopolitical fragmentation, energy constraints and increasingly complicated global supply chains. These problems cannot necessarily be resolved by flipping a switch.

Even if international trade and economic relations somehow returned to their pre2019 conditions tomorrow, rebuilding disrupted supply chains, industrial capacity and strategic reserves could still take years. Potentially many years. I'm genuinely concerned that the next decade will be defined less by exciting generational upgrades and more by availability, affordability, repairability and making existing hardware last considerably longer. Perhaps I'm being overly pessimistic. I sincerely hope so. But that brings me back to these articles. We're speculating about the hypothetical manufacturing costs of hypothetical hardware in a future market whose conditions we cannot meaningfully predict. That's speculation built on speculation built on speculation.

I see it as a clickbait, nothing more, nothing less.

I would much rather see manufacturers invest their resources into software optimisation, extending hardware lifespans and improving what we already own, rather than endlessly pushing another generation of increasingly expensive products into an increasingly uncertain market. We already have tremendous hardware and thousands of games worth playing. Nobody needs an RTX 8090 or a PS6 to enjoy gaming.

And yes, I realise how ridiculous it sounds to suggest slowing down hardware development on TechPowerUp, especially coming from someone who loves enthusiast hardware as much as I do ๐Ÿ˜… But priorities matter. At this point we find ourselves in, we might have to accept that the next great technological achievement isn't necessarily building something faster.

It might simply be learning how to keep what we've already built running. Sorry for my long rant once more, I just got provoked by this article like a prawn (pun intended).

P.S.: Just a little reality check for all of us guys. The RTX 5090 that's suppose to cost 1999USD, I never gotten to buy practically below 3000e, now costs 8000 - 12000 euros. I meam come on. Give it a break System!
What was released of the Epstein Files showed a glimpse of their evil plans and that's what we are seeing now and for the past decades in the flesh. Their plans were a slow boiling frog that is now boiling over. They literally schemed it out this way and said that they needed people to be hooked on certain things to control the population. It's all manipulation with a specific intent.
Posted on Reply
#37
uplink777
GrimlingTrue. The ironic part is, most people who cry about high memory and GPU prices now, will be clueless in 2027/2028 when they stand in front of the empty supermarket, that sells the last 10 bread for what a High end GPU used to cost in 2015...
I sincerely hope it won't get that bad mate.

Here in Slovakia, official inflation figures don't quite reflect my personal experience. Due to my gluten and lactose intolerance, my grocery bill has practically doubled since 2020. What used to cost me 100โ€“120 euro now costs roughly 200 euro. My breaking point would probably be somewhere around 300โ€“400e, and I imagine many households are already struggling.

Now add potential fertiliser shortages and further energy price shocks across the EU, and I'm genuinely worried about what's coming. I just hope something derails that catastrophe train before it reaches us ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿคž๐Ÿป
BigshrimpWhat was released of the Epstein Files showed a glimpse of their evil plans and that's what we are seeing now and for the past decades in the flesh. Their plans were a slow boiling frog that is now boiling over. They literally schemed it out this way and said that they needed people to be hooked on certain things to control the population. It's all manipulation with a specific intent.
That's something I've been wondering about for most of my life bud. I'm 42 yo (I'm an old fk ๐Ÿ˜…), and I fail to understand how easily people accept prevailing political and media narratives, while so many things around us seem to be falling apart. I'm not claiming there's necessarily some grand coordinated plan behind it, but the disconnect between public messaging and people's everyday experiences is genuinely disturbing.

And yup, I do understand Your concerns. What worries me most is how society will react, when these problems become impossible to ignore. And I have an uncomfortable feeling we'll find out in months, rather than years...
Posted on Reply
#38
Bigshrimp
uplink777That's something I've been wondering about for most of my life bud. I'm 42 yo (I'm an old fk ๐Ÿ˜…), and I fail to understand how easily people accept prevailing political and media narratives, while so many things around us seem to be falling apart. I'm not claiming there's necessarily some grand coordinated plan behind it, but the disconnect between public messaging and people's everyday experiences is genuinely disturbing.

And yup, I do understand Your concerns. What worries me most is how society will react, when these problems become impossible to ignore. And I have an uncomfortable feeling we'll find out in months, rather than years...
I would claim with almost certainty that the files absolutely reflect the reality we are in and the coordinated plans behind everything. That's why we can't get any more of it released, as it would show the true scope of it all. We definitely will be finding out in months and not years. It's all coming to a head for the midterms and afterwards. The Epstein Class has infected countries in all of the top places around the world.
Posted on Reply
#39
Bwaze
What if they, hear me out, just re-release PlayStation 5 and call it PlayStation 6, maybe give it a bit of an overclock? They could still sell it for over $1000, sure, but the main thing is that there would be less of an impact to production of server hardware.

And that's what's really essential here!
Posted on Reply
#40
Bigshrimp
BwazeWhat if they, hear me out, just re-release PlayStation 5 and call it PlayStation 6, maybe give it a bit of an overclock? They could still sell it for over $1000, sure, but the main thing is that there would be less of an impact to production of server hardware.

And that's what's really essential here!
They can just call it the PlayStation 5.5 Pro Ultra Max, lol.
Posted on Reply
#41
Grimling
uplink777I sincerely hope it won't get that bad mate.

Here in Slovakia, official inflation figures don't quite reflect my personal experience. Due to my gluten and lactose intolerance, my grocery bill has practically doubled since 2020. What used to cost me 100โ€“120 euro now costs roughly 200 euro. My breaking point would probably be somewhere around 300โ€“400e, and I imagine many households are already struggling.

Now add potential fertiliser shortages and further energy price shocks across the EU, and I'm genuinely worried about what's coming. I just hope something derails that catastrophe train before it reaches us ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿคž๐Ÿป

That's something I've been wondering about for most of my life bud. I'm 42 yo (I'm an old fk ๐Ÿ˜…), and I fail to understand how easily people accept prevailing political and media narratives, while so many things around us seem to be falling apart. I'm not claiming there's necessarily some grand coordinated plan behind it, but the disconnect between public messaging and people's everyday experiences is genuinely disturbing.

And yup, I do understand Your concerns. What worries me most is how society will react, when these problems become impossible to ignore. And I have an uncomfortable feeling we'll find out in months, rather than years...
Your concerns are very justified. If you have the financial Resources to leave Europe and start a new live somewhere else, then you should have that as you NUMBER 1 Priority! That is all i can tell you here...
Posted on Reply
#42
umeng2002
With everything that has happened in the past six years, it almost makes seem like COVID was intentionally released.
Posted on Reply
#43
Vemby
BwazeWhat if they, hear me out, just re-release PlayStation 5 and call it PlayStation 6, maybe give it a bit of an overclock? They could still sell it for over $1000, sure, but the main thing is that there would be less of an impact to production of server hardware.

And that's what's really essential here!
I was thinking the similar - but maybe with APU update to Zen 3? The BoM cost jump shouldn't be significant. Paired with PS5 Pro GPU capabilities + ML based upscaling; it would be suitable for 5 more years.

Do you need better graphics than we have now to enjoy games 5 years from now? At least I don't. I can live with current level and be perfectly happy.
Posted on Reply
#44
ZeDestructor
uplink777Sure mate, I'm all for UE5 and ray tracing. But who's going to afford the hardware needed to run all that at ultra settings? A few thousand enthusiasts? That won't finance an entire console generation. I have 48 GB of ultra high-end RAM and an RTX 5090, and I've seen what UE5 titles like Wukong can do to that hardware ๐Ÿ˜…

Now imagine delivering comparable visuals on an affordable console amid skyrocketing memory costs and supply constraints. I doubt it'll be commercially viable anytime soon, perhaps not for another 5โ€“10 years. For now, optimisation should be the priority. FSR, DLSS where supported, frame generation and squeezing more out of existing hardware.

Let's make better use of what we already have before chasing another generation of silicon, what do You say bud?
The problem is that despite complaining for the past decade+ about the lack of optimization, the gamedevs are not doing that. Instead, we are told to use framegen and upscaling, and since I would prefer not to use either, I have to end up paying up for bruteforce and keeping an eye on when new GPUs are showing up. The console rumours are just a sideshow for me, especially since the PS4/XB1 where consoles were not subsidized ever.
Posted on Reply
#45
uplink777
ZeDestructorThe problem is that despite complaining for the past decade+ about the lack of optimization, the gamedevs are not doing that. Instead, we are told to use framegen and upscaling, and since I would prefer not to use either, I have to end up paying up for bruteforce and keeping an eye on when new GPUs are showing up. The console rumours are just a sideshow for me, especially since the PS4/XB1 where consoles were not subsidized ever.
Of course you're right mate. My point was more about making better use of existing hardware. Sooner or later, developers, publishers and manufacturers will have to realise, that people simply cannot afford a new phone, console, VGA, car and five holidays every year. From the long term point of view, It's economically unsustainable.

And secondly, even if people have the money, I'm concerned that hardware simply won't be available in the quantities we've grown accustomed to in the past two decades. So if publishers want us to keep buying and playing games, proper optimisation will eventually become a necessity, not an option.

As for console subsidies, I wouldn't count on them anymore. My personal prediction is that the PS6 could cost $1,199โ€“$1,499, depending on storage capacity. And I might even be lowballing it ๐Ÿ˜…

Anyways, those are my two cents ๐Ÿค๐Ÿป
Posted on Reply
#46
ZeDestructor
uplink777Of course you're right mate. My point was more about making better use of existing hardware. Sooner or later, developers, publishers and manufacturers will have to realise, that people simply cannot afford a new phone, console, VGA, car and five holidays every year. From the long term point of view, It's economically unsustainable.

And secondly, even if people have the money, I'm concerned that hardware simply won't be available in the quantities we've grown accustomed to in the past two decades. So if publishers want us to keep buying and playing games, proper optimisation will eventually become a necessity, not an option.

As for console subsidies, I wouldn't count on them anymore. My personal prediction is that the PS6 could cost $1,199โ€“$1,499, depending on storage capacity. And I might even be lowballing it ๐Ÿ˜…

Anyways, those are my two cents ๐Ÿค๐Ÿป
Considering the state of thre super-major triple-A games... I'm not holding much hope for a pleasant surprise. Sfine though, I'm mostly playing older games anyways, so it's not much of a problem with the 5090... even at 8K.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 06:33 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts