Saturday, October 10th 2026

NVIDIA Reportedly Ending the RTX 5090, Reserves GB202 Silicon for Workstation GPUs

NVIDIA has reportedly stopped allocating GB202 silicon to the GeForce RTX 5090, according to leaker MEGAsizeGPU (@Zed__Wang) on X. "No more GB202 for 5090, confirmed," the leaker posted, adding in a follow-up that "all future GB202 supplies are RTX Pro exclusive." GB202 is the largest "Blackwell" graphics chip, and the RTX 5090 doesn't even max it out. The same chip powers the 96 GB RTX PRO 6000 with 24,064 CUDA cores, as well as the recently unveiled RTX PRO 5500, which pairs the RTX 5090's 21,760 CUDA cores with 84 GB of memory. Apparently, NVIDIA would rather put every GB202 it gets into those far pricier workstation cards. The company hasn't confirmed any of this as of the time of writing.

A second leaker, hongxing2020, posted "5090 EOL, 5080 24GB ready" alongside an apparent factory notice saying NVIDIA will no longer sell any RTX 5090 model, China-market D variants included. The same notice says an RTX 5080 24 GB will become the top GeForce card and the 16 GB version will be discontinued. That sounds a lot like the RTX 5080 SUPER, which was rumored with 24 GB of GDDR7 on the same GB203 chip, although it isn't clear if the two are the same card. SUPER cards reportedly reached board partners in July, only to be put on hold over GDDR7 pricing. As for the RTX 5090, I doubt NVIDIA would formally call this an end-of-life (EOL) move, since the chips are simply being redirected to a more profitable product line.
RTX 5090 buyers were already having a rough time. The card launched in January 2025 at $1,999, and last month European listings went past €5,000 while Walmart sold out at $4,299. Cards built from GB202 chips that partners already have could keep trickling out for a while, though it's reasonable to expect prices to climb further once that stock dries up. Of course, the RTX 5090 was hardly a gaming card for most people by this point, with AI firms reportedly picking up stock in bulk before it ever reached gaming retail. With the RTX 60-series reportedly slipping to 2028, the RTX 5080 24 GB may stay the fastest GeForce card in production for a long time.
Sources: MEGAsizeGPU on X, hongxing2020 on X, via Videocardz
Add your own comment

228 Comments on NVIDIA Reportedly Ending the RTX 5090, Reserves GB202 Silicon for Workstation GPUs

#176
unknownk
The GPU market is like the car market where many manufacturers are just chasing the most profit and making $100K trucks and SUVs while abandoning anything most consumers can afford. The used market is a mess in both areas as people fight over older stuff at much inflated prices.

In both areas unless a new manufacturer shows up and swallows up the budget market (which should be profitable in volume) the masses as screwed. Maybe after a few years Chinese FABs and chip designers will get to the point Nvidia was at 2020 and cheap RTX 3090 equivalents will flood the market. I was hoping Intel would bring some competition to the GPU market, but that company is a mess and doesn't have the money and drive to succeed in the arena.
Posted on Reply
#177
Doctor Who
lepudrukOk... If someone thought the 5090s were expensive, just wait and see - prices will shoot to the moon at the speed of light. Damn, I'm really glad I managed to buy mine for €3000.
People simply need to STOP overpaying for GPUs.
Problem Solved.
Posted on Reply
#178
NullVacuity
Nothing for me,because it too expesive for me.
Posted on Reply
#179
AusWolf
Doctor WhoPeople simply need to STOP overpaying for GPUs.
Problem Solved.
It's not about the people anymore. Big AI business will gladly pay what you or I won't, as the example shows.
pirty_waggenNoob, you spend 214% of my price for 131% of my card performance. go home.
Last really good deal was asus prime 5080 for around 1000€.
Or 5 times what I paid for my card, for +81% performance. That's the nature of halo products. You pay for having the best performance, not the best value.
Posted on Reply
#180
TheDigitalJedi
We must take care of our cards. I have warranties and insurance but if the supply isn't there, what do we do?

Undervolts, checking cable temperatures and even a Wireview Pro 2 can help protect our investments.
Posted on Reply
#181
AleXXX666
AusWolfOr 5 times what I paid for my card, for +81% performance. That's the nature of halo products. You pay for having the best performance, not the best value.
I still think that me paying like 250 EUR for "B-Die" 3200.14 2x16 GB kit was wasted $$$ (when "plain" 3200.16 could be got like whole 100 less lmfao)
I just "wanted to try it" lol
same stuff was purchasing 4400.19 ram kit, I couldn't even use it at RATED MAX speed with those time crappy Intel 10700K or 11400F I have had back then lmfao
Posted on Reply
#182
AusWolf
AleXXX666I still think that me paying like 250 EUR for "B-Die" 3200.14 2x16 GB kit was wasted $$$ (when "plain" 3200.16 could be got like whole 100 less lmfao)
I just "wanted to try it" lol
same stuff was purchasing 4400.19 ram kit, I couldn't even use it at RATED MAX speed with those time crappy Intel 10700K or 11400F I have had back then lmfao
Yeah, I buy lots of stuff on a whim just because I want to try something new. But I would never say, or even imply, that I'm making a sensible choice.

Making an emotional purchase is great. I'd even say that's what's kept the hobby cool for so long. But to pass it as objectively rational and "a good deal" is wrong.
Posted on Reply
#183
Doctor Who
AusWolfIt's not about the people anymore. Big AI business will gladly pay what you or I won't, as the example shows.
Well, this explains why gamers that use Nvidia tend to use older Nvidia GPUs because the new ones are far too overpriced. On top of retailers hiking them even further, this goes for Radeon GPUs too.
Posted on Reply
#184
AleXXX666
Doctor WhoWell, this explains why gamers that use Nvidia tend to use older Nvidia GPUs because the new ones are far too overpriced. On top of retailers hiking them even further, this goes for Radeon GPUs too.
"if it works, why replace it?" lol
Posted on Reply
#185
AusWolf
Doctor WhoWell, this explains why gamers that use Nvidia tend to use older Nvidia GPUs because the new ones are far too overpriced. On top of retailers hiking them even further, this goes for Radeon GPUs too.
The difference is that new Radeon GPUs are expensive because of the recent price hikes, while new Nvidia GPUs have been expensive since they released. Yet, you'll find many "enthusiasts" who don't care, especially here, so I doubt that your generalisation holds.
Posted on Reply
#186
AleXXX666
AusWolfbecause of the recent price hikes
AND/or resellers greed too lol:rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#188
AusWolf
AleXXX666AND/or resellers greed too lol:rolleyes:
If Nvidia and AMD increase their prices, fewer people will buy. If fewer people buy, retailers will have to put a larger profit margin to make the same money. Then, even fewer people will buy. It's a self generating cycle of a bad economy.
Posted on Reply
#189
JustBenching
Doctor WhoWell, this explains why gamers that use Nvidia tend to use older Nvidia GPUs because the new ones are far too overpriced. On top of retailers hiking them even further, this goes for Radeon GPUs too.
No, it's just that Nvidia gpus last longer due to having more features both in hardware and software alongside much longer driver support. Radeon gpus on the other hand are perfect for people who like changing gpus frequently
Posted on Reply
#190
AusWolf
JustBenchingNo, it's just that Nvidia gpus last longer due to having more features both in hardware and software alongside much longer driver support. Radeon gpus on the other hand are perfect for people who like changing gpus frequently
You know you don't need the newest drivers to play games, right?

I'm also curious how Nvidia's "hardware features" (whatever you mean by that) last longer.
Posted on Reply
#191
unknownk
Newer drivers fix glitches (among other things) in games that came out after the GPU shipped. Whoever supports their hardware with fixes longer allows users to play the latest games.
Posted on Reply
#192
Hecate91
JustBenchingNo, it's just that Nvidia gpus last longer due to having more features both in hardware and software alongside much longer driver support. Radeon gpus on the other hand are perfect for people who like changing gpus frequently
Like that melting power connector hardware feature? Or how 40 series owners didn't get any word on DLSS5 support until modders showed it was possible?
Posted on Reply
#193
JustBenching
AusWolfYou know you don't need the newest drivers to play games, right?
Of course you do. That's the whole point drivers exist. Latest driver took me from 71 fps to 90 on FH6 for example.
AusWolfI'm also curious how Nvidia's "hardware features" (whatever you mean by that) last longer.
A great upscaler that goes back to 2018 gpus for example.
unknownkNewer drivers fix glitches (among other things) in games that came out after the GPU shipped. Whoever supports their hardware with fixes longer allows users to play the latest games.
We've come to a point where somehow we have to pretend that not having drivers is better than having drivers cause a specific company guts their GPUs. Crazy but here we are...
Posted on Reply
#194
AusWolf
JustBenchingOf course you do. That's the whole point drivers exist. Latest driver took me from 71 fps to 90 on FH6 for example.
Because you're using Nvidia. AMD driver updates rarely do anything besides fixing bugs, especially with older architectures.
JustBenchingA great upscaler that goes back to 2018 gpus for example.
Does FSR 4 ring a bell?

Personal opinion: upscalers are never great.
JustBenchingWe've come to a point where somehow we have to pretend that not having drivers is better than having drivers cause a specific company guts their GPUs. Crazy but here we are...
Cuts?
Posted on Reply
#195
freeagent
Hecate91Like that melting power connector hardware feature?
I cant wait for AMD to fully commit to this connector. Then you will have to find another argument :laugh:
AusWolfPersonal opinion: upscalers are never great.
I am not using one right now, but they are pretty good tbh..
Posted on Reply
#196
JustBenching
AusWolfBecause you're using Nvidia. AMD driver updates rarely do anything besides fixing bugs, especially with older architectures.
Huh? okay bro
AusWolfDoes FSR 4 ring a bell?
No, it doesn't, older amd cards can't use it. Which goes back to my original point, radeon gpus are meant to be upgraded regularly. Nvidia cards are not.
Posted on Reply
#197
AusWolf
freeagentI am not using one right now, but they are pretty good tbh..
They are much better than they used to be. That doesn't make them good. But like I said, this is my opinion, I don't intend to start a fight over it.
JustBenchingHuh? okay bro
I don't speak cavemanish, sorry.
JustBenchingNo, it doesn't, older amd cards can't use it. Which goes back to my original point, radeon gpus are meant to be upgraded regularly. Nvidia cards are not.
RDNA 3 has it, and RDNA 2 will have it next year, probably in a... drumroll... driver update. ;)

Your original point is bullshit.
Posted on Reply
#198
JustBenching
So drivers are not needed - but we need drivers to get a decent upscaler. A couple of years more and the 2018 radeon gpu will also get it just like nvidia. :D Im out, this is too damn stupid.
Posted on Reply
#199
AusWolf
JustBenchingSo drivers are not needed - but we need drivers to get a decent upscaler. Im out, this is too damn stupid.
Fresh drivers are not needed. But you are getting one next year the latest, together with the "decent upscaler". Now please, don't hesitate to counter with your two hundred reasons why this isn't good enough, because nothing is when it comes to AMD.

Please also enlighten me how many more FPS I could squeeze out of my 6750 XT with a new driver. My guess is about zero.
Posted on Reply
#200
Hecate91
AusWolfFresh drivers are not needed. But you are getting one next year the latest, together with the "decent upscaler". Now please, don't hesitate to counter with your two hundred reasons why this isn't good enough, because nothing is when it comes to AMD.

Please also enlighten me how many more FPS I could squeeze out of my 6750 XT with a new driver. My guess is about zero.
I never understood the stance of update drivers the day a new one launches, drivers from either company are never perfect, and I prefer if it's not broken then don't fix it.
Although the irony with FH6 is it performed better with Radeon cards on launch, so it was an Nvidia driver problem.
freeagentI cant wait for AMD to fully commit to this connector. Then you will have to find another argument :laugh:
I can't wait for Nvidia to launch cards with two 12vhpwr connectors, then again I could just not buy it even harder.
More realistically I expect Nvidia to push yet another connector on the entire market, the one they're pushing now is too flawed, no matter how much anyone wants to give reasons how theirs hasn't failed yet.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 06:33 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts