Sunday, September 13th 2026

ASRock's TempGuard Failed to Stop a PSU-Side Connector Meltdown on a $15,000 RTX PRO 6000 Rig

A repair shop technician has reported another melted 16-pin power connector on an ASRock Taichi TC-1650T PSU, paired with a $15,000 NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition GPU. The former ships with native 12V-2x6 cables carrying ASRock's own NTC temperature sensor. According to the technician's Reddit post, the connector failed catastrophically on the PSU side and melted into the socket itself, even though both ends of the cable were fully seated. The GPU reportedly survived, and the damage was confined to the power supply side. The technician also says the sensor is mounted on the wrong side of the cable, on the ground line rather than the 12 V side it's supposed to watch, which would explain why it apparently never caught the rising heat in time.

ASRock added the NTC sensor and TempGuard system to its 12V-2x6 cables specifically to shut a system down before a connector melts. This time the system failed to catch the rising temperatures, but it has worked in the past. TempGuard reportedly caught a shunt-modded RTX 5090 pulling over 1,300 W, saving its power connectors from melting. On the flip side, this isn't the first time this exact GPU and PSU pairing has run into trouble either, as a similar melting incident on the same combo surfaced back in March. If the sensor placement is really off on at least some cables, that's a bigger concern than one bad unit, especially when paired with a card that costs as much as a used car.
Source: Reddit
Add your own comment

169 Comments on ASRock's TempGuard Failed to Stop a PSU-Side Connector Meltdown on a $15,000 RTX PRO 6000 Rig

#76
JustBenching
The fact that the only response to actual factual data is trolling says all that needs to be said about the seriousness of the situation. That's why people keep buying nvidia and ignore your desperate attempts.
Posted on Reply
#77
Vayra86
JustBenchingThe fact that the only response to actual factual data is trolling says all that needs to be said about the seriousness of the situation. That's why people keep buying nvidia and ignore your desperate attempts.
'Nvidia sells 50M GPUs so the failure rate ='
This is your factual data? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Mate, I'm just responding in kind to your drivel ;)
Posted on Reply
#78
JustBenching
Aleksandar_038Don't play coy... You know very well that graph shows ALL graphic cards sold.

Out of that number, there is subset of graphics with 12 HPWR connector.

Out of that second number, there is subset of graphics that actuall pull 500W or more, where connector failure can be expected... It for sure won't appear on graphics that pull 300W, no?
That graph had 147,88 million GPUs. 90% of those are nvidia. So that's 130 million. I only used 50 for my data, so almost 1/3rd, and then 1000Xed the number of cases. The failure rate was still miniscule. If that doesn't ring a bell I guess nothing will.
Vayra86'Nvidia sells 50M GPUs so the failure rate ='
This is your factual data? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Mate, I'm just responding in kind to your drivel ;)
No bro you are right. We got 10m melted connectors a quarter. My bad, keep on going
Posted on Reply
#79
Vayra86
JustBenchingThat graph had 147,88 million GPUs. 90% of those are nvidia. So that's 130 million. I only used 50 for my data, so almost 1/3rd, and then 1000Xed the number of cases. The failure rate was still miniscule. If that doesn't ring a bell I guess nothing will.


No bro you are right. We got 10m melted connectors a quarter. My bad, keep on going
And what percentage of that is a 5090? We know that x90s are the rarest sale in the GPU stack ;)
The bottom line is, you are literally just pulling numbers out of your ass and then try to sell them as 'factual data' to somehow make a point that is damaged almost daily by new examples about failing connectors. You are trying to bring legitimacy to your downplaying of that by using supposed facts that simply do not exist.

Apparently nuance is not in your dictionary. Yes, a 2-4% fail rate instead of the usual <1% is a major uptick in fail rate and yes, it does mean the connector or the card behind it, is lacking something. Nobody is talking about 10 million failures but you, again, another 'factual' number of yours pulled out of nowhere.

/thread
Posted on Reply
#80
Kenjiro
BoggledBeagle[...] This is a standard connector that exists for a long time. [...]
Wrong. Connector was designed and released officially within PCI Express Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 5.0 specification in 2021: pcisig.com/PCIExpress/Specs/CEM/CardElectromechanical_5.0
This connector is almost exact derivative of badly designed NVidia's connector used in RTX 3090 cards, but that cards used 3 split power circuits using 2 pins each thus avoiding problem.
NVidia's design is source of the problem and this design is plain wrong.

Similar connectors existed previously, but not the same exactly. They have different terminals and permissible current which makes great difference.
Posted on Reply
#81
Grimling
SpunjjatronCannot tell if joking or serious
This is by design!
Vayra86This is your factual data?
It is mostly anecdotal evidence, as we know some are even faked to make it in the news. Does this mean the Connector is perfect and never fails? NO. Does this mean the connector is dangerous and burns your home down? NO.
Posted on Reply
#82
JustBenching
Vayra86And what percentage of that is a 5090? We know that x90s are the rarest sale in the GPU stack ;)
The bottom line is, you are literally just pulling numbers out of your ass and then try to sell them as 'factual data' to somehow make a point that is damaged almost daily by new examples about failing connectors. You are trying to bring legitimacy to your downplaying of that by using supposed facts that simply do not exist.

/thread
So only the 5090 is going to melt? No 4090? 4080? 4080s? 5080? 4070ti?

Let's say you are right, it's only the 5090 / 4090s. Let's say they make up only 1% of sales (you think it's lower than that?). That's still 1.3m GPUs. I multipled the failure rate (the reported ones) by 1000x. That's 50.000 GPUs. We end up at a failure rate of 0,038. With a 1000x multiplier.....

Totally huge issue
Posted on Reply
#83
Krit
Vayra86The bottom line is, you are literally just pulling numbers out of your ass and then try to sell them as 'factual data' to somehow make a point that is damaged almost daily by new examples about failing connectors. You are trying to bring legitimacy to your downplaying of that by using supposed facts that simply do not exist.
He always was a true turbo lier cought it serval times in the past. His opinion should never be taken seriously.
Posted on Reply
#84
Vayra86
KritHe was always a turbo lier cought it serval times in past. His opinion should never be taken seriously.
His opinion is exactly that, an opinion in the sea of opinions, not something anyone should care about.
Posted on Reply
#86
Hecate91
JustBenchingSo only the 5090 is going to melt? No 4090? 4080? 4080s? 5080? 4070ti?

Let's say you are right, it's only the 5090 / 4090s. Let's say they make up only 1% of sales (you think it's lower than that?). That's still 1.3m GPUs. I multipled the failure rate (the reported ones) by 1000x. That's 50.000 GPUs. We end up at a failure rate of 0,038%. With a 1000x multiplier.....

Totally huge issue
What percentage of cards on that graph were sold are to AI companies? Or what percent of those cards are even gaming cards, not rtx A series?
You're failing to see the objective evidence here and in other threads while trying to downplay the connector failures because it isn't high enough in your opinion. It is an issue compared to 8 pin molex that we weren't constantly getting reports of melted connectors.
Posted on Reply
#87
JustBenching
Hecate91What percentage of cards on that graph were sold are to AI companies? Or what percent of those cards are even gaming cards, not rtx A series?
You're failing to see the objective evidence here and in other threads while trying to downplay the connector failures because it isn't high enough in your opinion. It is an issue compared to 8 pin molex that we weren't constantly getting reports of melted connectors.
The graph is DESKTOP DISCRETE GPUS. Therefore it doesn't matter who they were sold to, they still use the same connector. Stop it.
Posted on Reply
#88
Aleksandar_038
BoggledBeagleWhat are you talking about??? What is "the service area"? Do you really believe that the pins move due to the thermal cycles? Did you just make this up or what did you base this idea on?
Idea is based on basic physics knowledge, something learned in elementary school so even teenagers grasp it - at least in my country...
BoggledBeagleI am quite envious that things are so clear to you, I personally require some real data and reliable evidence, before I have those, I cannot draw any conclusion.

The cases I see reported just quite reliably prove, that the problem exists, but nobody knows, how serious this problem is, unless we have REAL RELIABLE DATA as real failure rate in comparison with other possible GPU failures.
But you supported claim of 50 millions GPUs, no? Obviously totally wrong number, no?
JustBenchingSo only the 5090 is going to melt? No 4090? 4080? 4080s? 5080? 4070ti?

Let's say you are right, it's only the 5090 / 4090s. Let's say they make up only 1% of sales (you think it's lower than that?). That's still 1.3m GPUs. I multipled the failure rate (the reported ones) by 1000x. That's 50.000 GPUs. We end up at a failure rate of 0,038%. With a 1000x multiplier.....

Totally huge issue
At best couple of hunderd thousands 600W GPUs. I already told you, that is was statistic says.

Of course 12HPWR is fit for 300W, but it is not fit for 600W and that is point.

Should we explain to knights in white satin why only 600w cards should be considered?
Posted on Reply
#89
BoggledBeagle
Hecate91You're failing to see the objective evidence here and in other threads while trying to downplay the connector failures ...
The only evidence is that something is happening. That is itself a meaningless information. I can give you an evidence that winners of large sums in a lottery exist but that does not mean that you or I will become a winner of a large sum.
Aleksandar_038Idea is based on basic physics knowledge, something learned in elementary school so even teenagers grasp it - at least in my country...
Teenagers from your country will need to teach electrical and mechanical engineers designing connectors. Because the phenomenon of wiggling pins in sockets is not yet known to them.
Posted on Reply
#90
JustBenching
I feel like people don't understand failure rates. Here, below is actual failure rates (catastrophics ones, ie. the CPU doesn't work) for CPUs.





The average failure rate across these 7 generations is around 4%. This is "normal". You think every 100 GPUs (high end ones) 4 of them melt their connectors? :D
Posted on Reply
#91
Hecate91
JustBenchingThe graph is DESKTOP DISCRETE GPUS. Therefore it doesn't matter who they were sold to, they still use the same connector. Stop it.
It matters because most of these connectors melt on consumer desktop GPU's, not pro workstation cards, the data is meaningless without the differentiation. Not to dismiss a connector melting in extremely expensive pro level cards though, your trying to downplay it is a bit sad, higher priced products should be held to a higher standard.
BoggledBeagleThe only evidence is that something is happening. That is itself a meaningless information. I can give you an evidence that winners of large sums in a lottery exist but that does not mean that you or I will become a winner of a large sum.
It is happening, while not with more reliable 8 pin molex, that is the point.
BoggledBeagleTeenagers from your country will need to teach electrical and mechanical engineers designing connectors. Because the phenomenon of wiggling pins in sockets is not yet known to them.
Then please enlighten us all with your electricial engineering knowledge.
JustBenchingI feel like people don't understand failure rates. Here, below is actual failure rates (catastrophics ones, ie. the CPU doesn't work) for CPUs.





The average failure rate across these 7 generations is around 4%. This is "normal". You think every 100 GPUs (high end ones) 4 of them melt their connectors? :D
So 4% failure rates are high to you because it's AMD, got it. The double standards are always impressive. If it were AMD who designed 12v2x6 everyone would be raging over it no matter the failure rate.
Posted on Reply
#92
JustBenching
Hecate91So 4% failure rates are high to you because it's AMD, got it. The double standards are always impressive. If it were AMD who designed 12v2x6 everyone would be raging over it no matter the failure rate.
Does your keyboard communicate with your brain? Where the heck did I mention AMD or that 4% is high? I said 4% is NORMAL. What the heck, if you are not trolling you are just dumb man. You are making things up to attack something that was never said, what the actual...

Im done with you, you are too far gone. Don't expect a reply again
Posted on Reply
#93
BoggledBeagle
I think the actual failure rate depends on a combinantion of factors strongly:

For example the worst case:

Cable: low quality, custom reworked, braided, supplied by another manufacturer
Age of the cable: old
Insertions: number well above specs
Handling of the cable: plugs strained, used in multiple systems
Combined with: RTX 5090 overclocked

Failure rate: high

The best case:

Cable: high quality, factory made, supplied by PSU manufacturer
Age of cable: quite new
Insertions: very low number
Handling of the cable: according to intended use of the cable and good installation practice
Combined with: RTX 5090 default

Failure rate: very low, comparable with other GPU failures

If we have a space of possible GPUs, cable manufacturers, quality, user handling and most of the failures concentrate in the very small area of high power GPUs, low quality cables, cables used not according to their intended use, looking just at this specific area is simply wrong.
JustBenchingDoes your keyboard communicate with your brain? Where the heck did I mention AMD or that 4% is high? I said 4% is NORMAL. What the heck, if you are not trolling you are just dumb man. You are making things up to attack something that was never said, what the actual...
I find some of the recent posts from some people quite bizzare. I am not even sure that the posters really believe what they write...
Posted on Reply
#94
JustBenching
BoggledBeagleI find some of the recent posts of some people quite bizzare. I am not even sure that the posters really believe what they write...
Crazy theory I know, but im starting to get convinced that they are being paid. There is no way someone does this for free and there is no way amd would be paying them for this behavior that pushes everyone away cause nobody wants to associate with them. So last option, it's nvidia paying them to make amd fans look silly. I cannot think of anything else that would make more sense. If that's the case, shame on nvidia. It should stop.
Posted on Reply
#95
BoggledBeagle
JustBenchingCrazy theory I know, but im starting to get convinced that they are being paid. There is no way someone does this for free and there is no way amd would be paying them for this behavior that pushes everyone away cause nobody wants to associate with them. ...
Who is being paid for sure are the poeple working for the various media sites. I do not want to call them journalists. They make a news story out of every single dubious post found on a chinese forum. I do not think this is a professional behavior.
Posted on Reply
#96
A Computer Guy
JustBenchingI feel like people don't understand failure rates. Here, below is actual failure rates (catastrophics ones, ie. the CPU doesn't work) for CPUs.





The average failure rate across these 7 generations is around 4%. This is "normal". You think every 100 GPUs (high end ones) 4 of them melt their connectors? :D
Wow, Wtf happened with 11th gen Intel?
Posted on Reply
#97
JustBenching
A Computer GuyWow, Wtf happened with 11th gen Intel?
Yeah, was disastrous. I had an 11600k for a brief time (got it for free after RMA), was goddamn horrible and was casually hitting over 200 watts. On a 6 core chip. Holy cow
Posted on Reply
#98
A Computer Guy
JustBenchingCrazy theory I know, but im starting to get convinced that they are being paid. There is no way someone does this for free and there is no way amd would be paying them for this behavior that pushes everyone away cause nobody wants to associate with them. So last option, it's nvidia paying them to make amd fans look silly. I cannot think of anything else that would make more sense. If that's the case, shame on nvidia. It should stop.
This is one reason you can’t rely on Reddit data, for example x3d failures with asrock. It’s too easy for competitors to exploit public perception of a problem when there is an across the board noticeable defect rate in AMD CPUs. More reliable data is needed to determine where the problem is and of course a vendor can’t necessarily come out suggest some blame on AMD because of repercussions.
Posted on Reply
#99
JustBenching
A Computer GuyThis is one reason you can’t rely on Reddit data, for example x3d failures with asrock. It’s too easy for competitors to exploit public perception of a problem when there is an across the board noticeable defect rate in AMD CPUs. More reliable data is needed to determine where the problem is.
I've always though that the x3d failure rates was mostly because of their popularity. In the DIY they outsold the other ryzen chips by more than 10:1 so yeah, their failure rates will also be 10 to 1, lol. That is the precise reason I bought a 9800x 3d and an asrock mobo, cause I didn't think there was an issue. Lo and behold, nothing happened. No explosions, no fires, everything is fine
Posted on Reply
#100
Prima.Vera
Aleksandar_038Imagine how much more expensive it would be, how much more stress to MoFSETs would be, how much more tracing it would need...
Also, nVidia, AMD and Intel could forget about improving their efficiency, instead they could keep adding moar watts until we are back at 1 kW again... We do not want that...
Finally, backward compatibility would be gone... We can not move on from ATX standard for years, let alone switch to completely different architecture...
With this negative thinking, and scare of change, no wonder that things are almost and remained exactly the same for the past 30 years.
We are past due for a change in my opinion...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 19:59 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts